Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:51:23.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-Determination, Behavioral Engagement, Disaffection, and Academic Performance: a Mediational Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

Antonio González  and
Paola Verónica Paoloni
Antonio González*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Vigo (Spain)
Paola Verónica Paoloni
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (Argentina)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Antonio González. Universidad de Vigo. Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación. As Lagoas. 32004. Ourense. (Spain). Tel: +34–988387110. Fax: +34–88387159. E-mail: aglez@uvigo.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examined the role of behavioral engagement and disaffection as mediators between self-determination and academic performance. Participants were 545 secondary students (53.4% girls) aged 12 to 19 years. Variables were assessed in the Spanish language classroom over a nine-month period. Students estimated their self-determination, and their teachers assessed student engagement, disaffection, and performance. Structural equation models corroborated the hypotheses: the types of self-determination differentially predicted engagement (R2 = .39) and disaffection (R2 = .24), and were progressively more adaptive the higher the autonomy; self-determination, behavioral engagement, and disaffection predicted performance (R2 = .43); engagement and disaffection partially mediated the relationship from external regulation (β = –.097; p < .002; Confidence Interval = –.177, –.051), identified regulation (β = .109; p < .006; CI = .054, .165), and intrinsic motivation (β = .139; p < .002; CI = .086, .206) to performance. The implications of these findings for current theory and educational intervention are discussed.

Keywords

self-determinationbehavioral engagement/disaffectionacademic performancesecondary educationSpanish language
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 17 , 2014 , E82
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303 Google Scholar
Arbuckle, J. (2008). AMOS 17. User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.Google Scholar
Archambault, I., Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. N. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 804–816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & Kaplan, A. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivation in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 482–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014236 Google Scholar
Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 315–342). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, A. D. (2013). Exit examinations, peer academic climate, and adolescents’ developmental outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 67–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.001 Google ScholarPubMed
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2 nd Ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Google Scholar
Durán, A., Extremera, N., Rey, L., Fernández-Berrocal, P., & Montalbán, M. (2006). Predicting academic burnout and engagement in educational settings: Assessing the incremental validity of perceived emotional intelligence beyond perceived stress and general efficacy. Psicothema, 18, 158–164.Google Scholar
Fenollar, P., Román, S., & Cuestas, P. J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 873–891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709907X189118 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudas, M., Biddle, S., & Fox, K. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 453–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01116.x Google Scholar
Green, J., Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). Motivation and engagement in English, mathematics and science high school subjects: Towards an understanding of multidimensional domain specificity. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 269–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.003 Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, M., Ruiz, L., & López, E. (2010). Perceptions of motivational climate and teachers’ strategies to sustain discipline as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 597–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002274 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J. N., Wu, W., & West, S. G. (2011). Teacher performance goal practices and elementary students’ behavioral engagement: A developmental perspective. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.003 Google Scholar
INEE. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos OCDE. Informe español [PISA 2009. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. Spanish report]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
INEE. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (2011). PISA-ERA 2009. Informe español [PISA-ERA 2009. Spanish report]. Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798–811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kish, L. (1995). Methods for design effects. Journal of Official Statistics, 11, 55–77.Google Scholar
Martin, A. J. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025988 Google Scholar
Martin, A. J., & Liem, G. A. D. (2010). Academic personal bests (PBs), engagement, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 265–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miñano, P., Castejón, J. L., & Gilar, R. (2012). An explanatory model of academic achievement based on aptitudes, goal orientations, self-concept and learning strategies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 48–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37283 Google Scholar
Moreno, J., González, D., & Chillón, M. (2009). Preliminary validation in Spanish of a scale designed to measure motivation in physical education classes: The Perceived Locus of Causality (PLOC) Scale. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 327–337.Google Scholar
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 161–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.557329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raftery, J., Grolnick, W., & Flamm, E. (2012). Families as facilitators of student engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 343–364). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Ratelle, C., Guay, F., Vallerand, R., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 734–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734 Google Scholar
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.749 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectic perspective. In Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: Motivation, learning, and well-being. In Wentzel, K. & Wigfield, A. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp.171–195). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 23, 53–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrout, P. E. & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, E. A., Chi, U., & the Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and engagement as “active ingredients” in garden-based education: Examining models and measures derived from self-determination theory. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43, 16–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.596856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kinderman, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E. A., Kinderman, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in the academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Christenson, S., Reschly, A., & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, Y., Caudroit, J., Boiché, J., & Sarrazin, P. (2011). Predictors of situational disengagement in the academic setting: The contribution of grades, perceived competence, and academic motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 441–455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709910X522285 Google Scholar
Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239 Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Zanna, M. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 29, pp. 271–360). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 Google Scholar
Wormington, S. V., Corpus, J. H., & Anderson, K. G. (2012). A person-centered investigation of academic motivation and its correlates in high school. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 429–438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, A. D., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar