Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Towards a Characterization of a Motive whose Ultimate Goal is to Increase the Welfare of the World: Quixoteism

  • Sergio Salgado (a1) and Luis Oceja (a1)
Abstract

We use the term Quixoteism to refer to a new social motive. The characterization of this motive deals with two aspects: the definition of the ultimate goal (i.e., to increase the welfare of the world) and the proposal of a process that activates it (i.e., a transcendental-change orientation). Three studies were conducted to test this characterization. In Study 1 we developed an empirical measure of the transcendental-change orientation. The participants in Studies 2 and 3 were presented with a need situation. Results showed that the centrality of such an orientation was directly related to an interpretation consistent with the ultimate goal of Quixoteism (Study 2), and that its salience increases the likelihood of performing a high-cost prosocial behavior (Study 3).

Se propone la existencia de un motivo social que hemos denominado Quijotismo. La caracterización de este motivo comprende dos aspectos: la definición de un fin último diferenciado (i.e., mejorar el bienestar del mundo) y la propuesta de un proceso que facilita su activación (i.e., orientación al cambio trascendente). Se realizaron tres estudios para contrastar empíricamente dicha caracterización. En el Estudio 1 se desarrolló una medida operativa de la orientación al cambio trascendente. A los participantes de los Estudios 2 y 3 se les presentó una situación de necesidad. Los resultados mostraron que la centralidad de dicha orientación está relacionada con una interpretación consistente con el fin último de mejorar el bienestar del mundo (Estudio 2), y que su saliencia aumenta la probabilidad de realizar una conducta prosocial de alto coste (Estudio 3).

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Luis Oceja or Sergio Salgado. Ciudad Universitaria Cantoblanco (UAM). Facultad de Psicología, Despacho 83. 28049 Madrid. (Spain). E-mails: luis.oceja@uam.es and sergiosalgados@yahoo.es
References
Hide All
Agis, I. F., Carmona, E., Fuentes, L., & Catena, A. (1996). Mecanismos inhibitorios de la atención selectiva: Una revisión [Inhibiting mechanisms of the selective attention]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 50, 359370.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Batson, C. D. (1994). Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603610. doi:10.1177/0146167294205016
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and Prosocial Behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology, 4th ed. (Vol. 2, pp. 282316). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Lishner, D. A. (2009). Empathy and altruism. In Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.). Oxford handbook of positive psychology 2nd ed., (pp. 417426). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Powell, A., Stocks, E. L., Shah, J., & Gardner, W. L. (2008). Prosocial Motivation. In Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (Eds.). Handbook of motivation science (pp. 135149). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., & Tsang, J. (2002). Four motives for community involvement. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 429445. doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00269
Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 5277. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different motivational consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 1940. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00426.x
Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. (2003). Altruism and Prosocial behavior. In Millon, T., & Lerner, M. (Eds.). Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463484). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Volunteerism. In Bierhoff, H. W. (Ed.). Prosocial Behavior (pp. 313323). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decisions rules of altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.773
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.). The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed. (Vol. 2, pp. 151192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In Clayton, S., & Opotow, S. (Eds.). Identity and the natural environment (pp. 4565). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: the influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 1135–51. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.6.1135
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1037/10628-000
Haidt, J. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In Keyes, C. L. M., & Haidt, J. (Eds.). Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275289). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10594-012
Hitlin, H., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 359393. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110640
Kant, I. (1781). Crítica de la razón pura [Critique of pure reason]. Ed., 1978. Madrid: Alfaguara. doi: 10.1037/11654-000 (English versión translated by Meiklejhon, J. M. D.)
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper.
Oceja, L., & Berenguer, J. (2009). Putting text in context: The conflict between pro-ecological messages and anti-ecological descriptive norms. The Spanish Journal of Psychology. 12, 657666.
Oceja, L., & Jiménez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy toward the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 369379.
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schoroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–92. doi:10.1146/annurev. psych.56.091103.070141
Pérez-Albéniz, A., de Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Montes, M. P., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español [Adaptation to Spanish of Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)]. Psicothema, 15, 267272.
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 172. doi:10.1017/S0140525X02000018
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
Ros, M., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Jerarquía de valores de la Europa Occidental: una comparación transcultural [Hierarchy of values of Western Europe: a cross-cultural comparison]. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 69, 6988. doi:10.2307/40183777
Schmitt, M. J., Schwartz, S. H., Steyer, R., & Schmitt, T. (1993). Measurement models for the Schwartz Values Inventory. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 107121.
Schultz, W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 12191247. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Zanna, M. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 165). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60281-6
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 1945. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
Schwartz, S. H., Verkasalo, M., Antonovsky, A., & Sagiv, L. (1997). Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 318.
Silver, J., & Haidt, J. (2008). Moral elevation can induce nursing. Emotion, 8, 291295. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.2.291
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191193. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::AID-JCLP2270280220>3.0.CO;2-G
Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434447. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434
Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Personality and the Dual Nature of Economic Risk Taking. European Journal of Personality, 15, 105122. doi:10.1002/per.426
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Spanish Journal of Psychology
  • ISSN: 1138-7416
  • EISSN: 1988-2904
  • URL: /core/journals/spanish-journal-of-psychology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed