Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T16:11:03.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

America's Crowded Statehouses: Measuring and Explaining Lobbying in the U.S. States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

James Strickland*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
*
James Manning Strickland, University of Michigan, 5700 Haven Hall, 505 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1045, USA. Email: strickl@umich.edu

Abstract

Across the United States over time, numbers of registered interest groups have continued to increase, but these populations mask the total amount of lobbying that is occurring within America's statehouses. Among registered interests, average numbers of hired lobbyists have increased markedly since the late 1980s. This study both quantifies this increase and identifies a set of causal variables. Previous studies have proposed a variety of short-term, political and long-term, institutional factors that govern rates of lobbying. Using a new data set spanning multiple decades, I find that changes in lobbying can largely be ascribed to institutional variables, including the implementation of term limits and regulations on lobbying. Lobby regulations, one-party dominance, and legislative expenditures also appear to play a role in determining rates of multiclient lobbying. Direct democracy and state spending do not affect the hiring of lobbyists by registered interest groups.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Paul D. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Raymond A., Poole, Ithiel De Sola, and Dexter, Lewis Anthony. 1963. American Business and Public Policy: The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2001. “Throwing out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Yoon.” International Organization 55 (2): 487495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benz, Jennifer, Kirkland, Justin H., Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, Sykes, Jennifer, and Deason, Mary. 2011. “Mediated Density: The Indirect Relationship between U.S. State Public Policy and PACs.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 440459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Michael B. 2001. “Legislative Professionalism and the Demand for Groups: The Institutional Context of Interest Population Density.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 661679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Berkman, Michael B., and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 859874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Jeffrey H., and Murray, Alan S.. 1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch: Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and the Unlikely Triumph of Tax Reform. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2002. “The Effect of Direct Democracy on the Size and Diversity of State Interest Group Populations.” The Journal of Politics 64:827844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2005. The Indirect Effect of Direct Legislation: How Institutions Shape Interest Group Systems. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J. 2008. “The Initiative Process and the Dynamics of State Interest Group Populations.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8 (4): 362383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Bowen, Daniel C.. 2010. “Direct Democracy and Individual Interest Group Membership.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 659671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Daniel C., and Greene, Zachary. 2014. “Should We Measure Professionalism with an Index? A Note on Theory and Practice in State Legislative Professionalism Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14 (3): 277296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasher, Holly, Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1999. “State Lobby Registration Data: The Anomalous Case of Florida (and Minnesota Too!).” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (2): 303314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:271300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, Peter J., Mueller, Dennis C., and Murrell, Peter. 1990. “Electoral Politics, Interest Groups, and the Size of Government.” Economic Inquiry 28:682705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2015. The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusso, Aaron. 2010. “Legislation, Political Context, and Interest Group Behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (1): 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Cluverius, John, Harden, Jeffrey J., Shor, Boris, and Lowery, David. 2015. “Party Competition, Party Polarization, and the Changing Demand for Lobbying in the American States.” American Politics Research 43 (2): 175204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1995. “Interest Representation and Democratic Gridlock.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (4): 531552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996a. The Population Ecology of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996b. “The World of Contract Lobbying.” Comparative State Politics 17:3140.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Lowery, David, and Fellowes, Matthew. 2005. “Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy: Understanding the Demand Side of Lobbying.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 404434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard T., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard T., and Reynolds, Molly E.. 2012. “Targeted Issue Advertising and Legislative Strategy: The inside Ends of outside Lobbying.” Journal of Politics 74 (3): 888902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard T., and Wayman, Frank W.. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84 (3): 797820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Kennith G., Wilson, Laura Ann, and Brunk, Gregory G.. 1991. “Societal Complexity and Interest-Group Lobbying in the American States.” Journal of Politics 53 (2): 488503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattelman, Kyle T. 2015. “Legislative Professionalism and Group Concentration: The ESA Model Revisited.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 4 (2): 165184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1988. “Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model.” American Journal of Political Science 32:838863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Justin H., Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 2010. “Policy Agendas, Party Control, and PAC Contributions in the American States.” Business and Politics. 12 (4): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2015. “State Economic and Government Finance Data.” Version 1. Harvard Dataverse. doi:10.7910/DVN/CJBTGD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
LaPira, Timothy M., and Thomas, Herschel M.. 2017. Revolving Door Lobbying: Public Service, Private Influence, and the Unequal Representation of Interests. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
LaPira, Timothy M., Thomas, Herschel M., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2014. “The Two Worlds of Lobbying: Washington Lobbyists in the Core and on the Periphery.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 3 (3): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Beth L., Baumgartner, Frank R., Pira, Timothy M. La, and Semanko, Nicholas A.. 2005. “Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (1): 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Taylor. 2017. “Swamped: More Than Half the Members of Washington's Lobbying Corps Have Plunged into the Tax Debate.” (accessed March 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Lofland, John. 1982. “Crowd Lobbying: An Emerging Tactic of Interest Group Influence in California.” Davis: Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California.Google Scholar
Long, Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Gray, Virginia. 1995. “The Population Ecology of Gucci Gulch, or the Natural Regulation of Interest Group Numbers in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, Gray, Virginia, and Fellowes, Matthew. 2005. “Sisyphus Meets the Borg: Economic Scale and the Inequalities in Interest Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 17:4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, David, and Marchetti, Kathleen. 2012. “You Don't Know Jack: Principals, Agents, and Lobbying.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 1 (2): 139170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W. 1963. The Washington Lobbyists. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2004. “Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (3): 357381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., and Thompson, Joel A.. 2001. “On the outside Looking In: Lobbyists' Perspectives on the Effects of State Legislative Term Limits.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 1 (4): 394411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2007. “Lobbyists and Interest Groups.” In Institutional Change in American Politics: The Case of Term Limits, eds. Kurtz, Karl T., Cain, Bruce, and Niemi, Richard G.. Pp. 119133. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C., and Murrell, Peter. 1986. “Interest Groups and the Size of Government.” Public Choice 48:125145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2016. “Size of State Legislative Staff.” National Conference of State Legislatures. (accessed December 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Newmark, Adam J. 2005. “Measuring State Legislative Lobbying Regulation, 1990-2003.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5 (2): 182191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Opheim, Cynthia. 1991. “Explaining the Differences in State Lobby Regulation.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 405421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, David M., Jacobsmeier, Matthew L., and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-level Data.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (4): 446459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranney, Austin J. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American states, eds. Jacob, Herbert, and Vines, Kenneth, 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 5194.Google Scholar
Ridge, Jason, Ingram, Amy, and Hill, Aaron. 2017. “Beyond Lobbying Expenditures: How Lobbying Breadth and Political Connectedness Affect Firm Outcomes.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (3): 11381163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1993. The Third House: Lobbyists and Lobbying in the States. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. 1992. Interests and Institutions: Substance and Structure in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie. 2010. “Measuring ‘Term Limitedness’ in Cross Sectional Research.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 199217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schiff, Eleanor L., Seufer, Kim, Whitesell, Anne, and Lowery, David. 2015. “Agency Problems and Interest Representation: An Empirical Analysis of the Costs of Lobbying.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 4:225248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7:211227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, James M. 2018a. “A Paradox of Political Reform: Shadow Interests in the U.S. States.” American Politics Research. Published electronically July 31. doi:10.1177/1532673X18788049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, James M. 2018b. “The Contingent Value of Relationships: The Supply and Demand for Revolving-Door Lobbyists.” Paper presented at the 89th Annual Conference of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans. (accessed January 25, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, James M., and Crosson, Jesse M.. 2016. “K Street on Main: How Political Institutions Cultivate a Professional Lobbying Elite.” Paper presented at the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia. (accessed January 25, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tankersley, Jim, Kaplan, Thomas, and Vogel, Kenneth P.. 2017,. “Lobbying Frenzy Begins on Tax Bill.” New York Times, November 3. (accessed March 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Thomas, Clive S. 1998. “Interest Group Regulation across the United States: Rationale, Development and Consequences.” Parliamentary Affairs 51 (4): 500515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Herschel F., and LaPira, Timothy M.. 2017. “How Many Lobbyists are in Washington' Shadow Lobbying and the Gray Market for Policy Advocacy.” Interest Groups and Advocacy 6:199214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitesell, Anne, Schiff, Eleanor, and Lowery, David. 2018. “Agency Issues with Small Lobby Firms: A Test of Competing Hypotheses.” Interest Groups & Advocacy 7:82103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert, ed. 1990. American Lobbyists Directory: A Guide to the More than 65,000 Registered Federal and State Lobbyists and the Businesses, Organizations, and Other Concerns They Represent. Detroit: Gale Research.Google Scholar