Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T03:22:56.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sink or Swim: What Happened to California's Bilingual Students after Proposition 227?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Valentina A. Bali
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Proposition 227, passed by California voters in 1998, aimed to dismantle bilingual programs in public schools and to replace them with English-only programs. Bilingual education, a long-standing program in California, involved mostly Hispanic students of limited English skills who were taught initially in their native language, and then were gradually transitioned into English-only classes. Using individual-level data from one southern California school district, I find that in 1998, before Proposition 227, limited-English-proficient (LEP) students enrolled in bilingual classes had lower scores in reading than LEP students who were not enrolled in bilingual classes, and who were, in general, more proficient in English. In math, bilingual students had test scores as good as those of non-bilingual LEPs. But in 1999, after Proposition 227, the same set of bilingual students had reading and math scores that were no worse than those of non-bilingual LEPs. Proposition 227, which interrupted bilingual programs and emphasized English instruction, did not set bilingual LEP students back relative to non-bilingual LEPs, and it may have even benefited them.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Fall 2001 , pp. 295 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R. Michael. 1999. “Why Did Proposition 227 Pass?” California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Typescript.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith, and de Kanter, A.. 1983. “Federal Policy and the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education.” In Bilingual Education, ed. Baker, Keith and de Kanter, A.. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Bali, Valentina. 2001. “Evidence on the Beneficial Effects of Short Periods of Bilingual Instruction.” California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA. Typescript.Google Scholar
Bohte, John, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2000. “Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating.” Public Administration Review 60:173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Department of Education. 2001. http://www.cde.ca.gov. (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar
Clark, Kevin. 1999. “From Primary Language to English Acquisition.” Read Perspectives 6: 146–175.Google Scholar
Collier, Virginia. 1992. “A Synthesis of Studies Examining Long-Term-Language-Minority Students Data on Academic Achievement.” Bilingual Research Journal 16: 187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Virginia, and Thomas, Wayne P.. 1989. “How Quickly Can Immigrants Become Proficient in School English?” The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students 5: 26–38.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, and Martinez, Francisco J.. 1999. “Educating California's Immigrant Children: The Origins and Implementation of Proposition 227.” Report 2. La Jolla, CA: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. 1995. Bilingual Education: History, Politics, Theory and Practice. Trenton, NJ: Crane.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, Linda. 2000. “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State Policy Evidence.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8. http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1 (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar
Draper, David. 1995. “Inference and Hierarchical Modeling in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 20: 115–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faltis, Christian, and Hudelson, Sarah. 1998. Bilingual Education in Elementary and Secondary Communities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Fetler, M. 1999. “High School Staff Characteristics and Mathematics Test Results.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 7. http://www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n9 (February 15, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Eugene. 1991. “The Education of Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Students: Effective Instructional Practices.” National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. http://ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpub/ncrdsll/ (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar
Giles, Michael, and Evans, Arthur. 1986. “The Power Approach to Intergroup Hostility.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 30: 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Jeff. 2000. “Assessing the Impact of Education Public Policies: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Resource Allocation.” University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Typescript.Google Scholar
Greene, Jay. 1998. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education.” Thomas Rivera Policy Institute, Claremont, CA. Typescript.Google Scholar
Greene, William. 1993. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji. 1999. “What Legitimate Inferences Can Be Made from the 1999 Release of SAT-9 Scores with Respect to the Impact of Proposition 227 on the Performance of LEP Students?” http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/SAT9 (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar
Hakuta, Kenji. 2000. “How Long Does it Take an English Learner to Attain Proficiency?” http://www.stanford.edu/~hakuta/SAT9 (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric. 1986. “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools.” Journal of Economic Literature 24:1141–1177.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric. 1999. “Some Findings From an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and From Other Investigation of Class Size Effects.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21: 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney, and Tolbert, Caroline. 1996. “A Racial/Ethnic Diversity Interpretation of Politics and Policy in the States of the U.S.” American Journal of Political Science 40:851–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jencks, Christopher, and Phillips, Meredith, eds. 1998. The Black-White Test Score Gap. Washington, D.C: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1996. Under Attack: The Case Against Bilingual Education. Culver City, CA: Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1999. Condemned without a Trial: Bogus Arguments Against Bilingual Education. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kossoudji, Sherrie. 1988. “English Language Ability and the Labor Market Opportunities of Hispanic and East Asian Immigrant Men.” Journal of Labor Economics 6: 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, Mark Hugo. 2000. “Evaluating Proposition 227.” Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco. Typescript.Google Scholar
Lopez, Mark Hugo, and Mora, Marie T.. 1998. “The Labor Market Effects of Bilingual Education Among Hispanic Workers.” Read Perspectives 5: 33–54.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times. 1999. “Students Make Slight Gains in Smaller Classes.” June 23, Section A.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLanahan, Sara, and Sandefur, Gary. 1994. Growing up with a Single Parent. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth, and Stewart, Joseph. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.” The Journal of Politics 60: 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnane, Richard. 1975. The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner City Children. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council Report. 1998. Educating Language-Minority Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. 1995. “The Condition of Education 1995: The Educational Progress of Hispanic Students.” Report 767. Washington, DC: NCES.Google Scholar
Pate-Bain, Helen, Achileles, C.M, Boyd Zaharias, J., and McKenna, Bernard. 1992. “Class Size Does Make a Difference.” Phi Delta Kappan 74: 253–256.Google Scholar
Ramirez, David. 1992. “Executive Summary.” Bilingual Research Journal 16 (1&2): 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravitch, Diane. 2000. Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rossell, Christine. 1999. “Mystery on the Bilingual Express: A Critique of the Thomas and Collier Study.” Read Perspectives 2: 5–32.Google Scholar
Rossell, Christine. 2000. “Bilingual Education in California Before and After Proposition 227.” Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco. Typescript.Google Scholar
Rossell, Christine, and Baker, Keith. 1996. “The Educational Effectiveness of Bilingual Education.” Research in the Teaching of English 30 (1): 7–74.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack. 1981. “The Diffusion of Knowledge, Policy Communities, and Agenda Setting: The Relationship of Knowledge and Power.” In New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy, Tropman, John, Dluhy, Milan, and Lind, Roger, eds. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Willig, A.C. 1985. “A Meta-Analysis of Selected Studies on the Effectiveness of Bilingual Education.” Review of Educational Research 55: 269–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong Fillmore, Lily. 1998. “Primary and Supplemental Declaration of Lily Wong Fillmore in Valeria G. et al v Pete Wilson (1998). http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/linguistics/people/grads/macswan/fillmor1.htm (February 15, 2001).Google Scholar