Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Centeno, Miguel A. Nag, Manish Patterson, Thayer S. Shaver, Andrew and Windawi, A. Jason 2015. The Emergence of Global Systemic Risk. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 65.


    ×
  • Studies in American Political Development, Volume 28, Issue 1
  • April 2014, pp. 26-48

Competing Institutional Perspectives in the Life of Glass–Steagall

  • Philip A. Wallach (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X13000175
  • Published online: 11 February 2014
Abstract

A growing body of scholarship explores processes of gradual but transformative institutional change, classifying patterns of change into several categories. I argue that policymakers themselves actively contest the appropriate institutional frames for understanding changes as they seek to guide institutional change, and show that judicial determinations of statutory meaning are sensitive to judgments about which institutional perspective is most compelling. A process-tracing examination of institutional changes in the Glass–Steagall Act over the law's whole life span, from 1933 to 1999, provides a concrete example of how the dynamics of contestation can play out. Those who conceived of Glass–Steagall as the institutional embodiment of the separation between commercial and investment banking argued that expansion of commercial bank powers represented institutional drift. Alternatively, those who came to see Glass–Steagall as just one set of statutory imperatives to be handled within the larger institutional context of American banking law, including banking regulators, interpreted regulatory changes as constructive acts of conversion adapting to novel economic challenges. I document the slow process through which courts came to accept the second framing while noting how the fixity of statutory text nevertheless continued to limit available adaptations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
PWallach@brookings.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Sandra Suárez and Robin Kolodny, “Paving the Road to ‘Too Big to Fail’: Business Interests and the Politics of Financial Deregulation in the United States,” Politics and Society 39 (2011): 74102.


George Stigler, “The Theory of Economic Regulation,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1971): 321

Sam Peltzman, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Law & Economics 19 (1976): 211240.

Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)



Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×