Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Studies in American Political Development, Volume 24, Issue 1
  • April 2010, pp. 90-120

Westward Expansion, Preappointment Politics, and the Making of the Southern Slaveholding Supreme Court

  • Justin Crowe (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2010

In this article, I trace the historical lineage and dynamic processes leading to the creation of the Southern slaveholding Supreme Court of antebellum America. Supported by case studies of several Jeffersonian and Jacksonian era legislative battles over judicial reform, I argue that the complex, multistage creation of the Southern slaveholding Court—the Court that decided cases such as Prigg v. Pennsylvania, Dred Scott v. Sandford, and Ableman v. Booth—was the inadvertent result of certain institutional strictures concerning the size of the Court and the geographic organization of the federal circuit system. In so doing, I illustrate how the creation of a fundamentally Jacksonian but also disproportionately Southern and undeniably slaveholding Court was not simply about who was appointed but about the structures that determined who might be appointed, who could be appointed, and who should be appointed. It was these considerations, in turn, that shaped not only the makeup and composition of the Court during this tumultuous period of American political development but also the very character of the momentous decisions it was likely to make.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James F. Spriggs II and Paul J. Wahlbeck , “Calling It Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1893–1991,” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1995): 573–97

Peverill Squire , “Politics and Personal Factors in Retirement from the United States Supreme Court,” Political Behavior 10 (1998): 180–90

Howard Gillman , “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891,” American Political Science Review 96 (2002): 511–24

Mark A. Graber , “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary,” Studies in American Political Development 7 (1993): 3573, 46–50

Mark A. Graber , “Federalist or Friends of Adams: The Marshall Court and Party Politics,” Studies in American Political Development 12 (1998): 229–66

Keith E. Whittington , “Presidential Challenges to Judicial Supremacy and the Politics of Constitutional Meaning,” Polity 33 (2001): 365–95

Justin Crowe , “The Forging of Judicial Autonomy: Political Entrepreneurship and the Reforms of William Howard Taft,” The Journal of Politics 69 (2007): 7387

Curtis Nettels , “The Mississippi Valley and the Federal Judiciary, 1807–1837,” The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 12 (1925): 202–26

Jeffrey A. Jenkins and Brian R. Sala , “The Spatial Theory of Voting and the Presidential Election of 1824,” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1998): 1157–79

Mark A. Graber , “The Jacksonian Origins of Chase Court Activism,” Journal of Supreme Court History 25 (2000): 1739

Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek , The Search for American Political Development (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004)

Paul Pierson , Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004)

Peter Bachrach and Morton S. Baratz , “Two Faces of Power,” American Political Science Review 56 (1962): 947–52

Stephen Skowronek , Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in American Political Development
  • ISSN: 0898-588X
  • EISSN: 1469-8692
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-american-political-development
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *