Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:03:27.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primitive Christianity revived: religious renewal in Augustan England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Eamon Duffy
Eamon Duffy*
Affiliation:
King's CollegeUniversity of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The restoration of Charles II seemed to the men of the church of England the miraculous inauguration of a golden age—‘When the Lord turned again the captivity of Sion: then were we like unto them that dream. Then was our mouth filled with laughter: and our tongue with joy.’ The clerical beneficiaries of the settlement of 1662 had much to rejoice them; the act of uniformity symbolised the secure replanting of the Laudian ideal, an ideal which, as R. S. Bosher has shown, had stiffened and intensified in the years of adversity. The restored church was more certain of itself, more intransigent in its jure divino episcopal claims, than the church of the 1630s. This new assurance was nourished by the flowering of anglican patristic learning which is so striking a feature of the later seventeenth century. The magisterial works of Ussher and Pearson on the Ignatian epistles, of Pearson and Fell on Cyprian, and of Bull on the ante-Nicene fathers, each contributed to a deepening sense of the continuity of the church of England with the catholic church of the first centuries. More and more the appeal to antiquity became the criterion of orthodoxy, and in that antiquity anglicanism found not merely its origins, but, occasionally and increasingly, a mirror image of itself. William Beveridge told his hearers at St Peter’s Cornhill.

there are [some] who blame our Reformation as defective, as if the Church were not reformed, not purged enough from the errors it had before contracted; but if such would but lay aside all prejudices and impartially consider the constitution of our church, as it is now reformed, they might clearly see that as there is nothing defective so neither is there anything superflous in it, but that it exactly answers the pattern of the Primitive and Apostolical Church itself, as near as it is possible for a national church to do it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 14: Renaissance and Renewal in Christian History , 1977 , pp. 287 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sykes, [Norman], From Sheldon to Secker (Cambridge 1959) p 1 Google Scholar.

2 Bosher, R.S., The Making of the Restoration Settlement (London 1951)Google Scholar.

3 Sykes, From Sheldon to Secker, pp 105-42.

4 Beveridge, William, Works, 12 vols, Library of Anglo-Catholic Theology (Oxford 1843-8) 2 p 444 Google Scholar; Bennet, G. V., ‘Patristic Tradition in Anglican Thought 1660-1900’, Oecumenica 1971/2 (Strasburg/Minneapolis/Paris/Neuchatel 1972) pp 63–76 Google Scholar.

5 Ward, Richard, The Life of the Learned and Pious Dr Henry More (London 1710) p 178 Google Scholar.

6 John Milton, quoted in Redwood, John, Reason, Ridicule and Religion (London 1976) p 173 Google Scholar.

7 Cave, [William], Primitive Christianity [or, the Religion of the Ancient Christians In the first ages of the Gospel] (London 1673)Google Scholar.

8 Cave, Primitive Christianity, preface (no pagination).

9 Ibid Sig A2v.

10 Ibid Sig Ar.

11 Ibid pt 2 pp 318-402; pt 1 pp 124-50, 156, 330, 339.

12 Ibid pt 2 p 439.

13 Ibid Sig Av.

14 Bennet, [G. V.], ‘Conflict in the Church’, in Britain After the Glorious Revolution, ed Holmes, Geoffrey (London 1969) p 157 Google Scholar.

15 Portus, [G. V.], Caritas Anglicana (London 1912) pp 1–27 Google Scholar; Bullock, [F. W.B.], Voluntary Religious Societies [1520-1799] (St Leonards on Sea 1963) pp 125-49Google Scholar.

16 Horneck, [Anthony], The Sirenes; or, Delight and Judgment (2 ed London 1690)Google Scholar preface sig A3-A3v.

17 Bullock, Voluntary Religious Societies, pp 128-9.

18 Secretan, [C. F.], [Memoirs of the Life and Times of the] Pious Robert Nelson (London 1860) p 175 Google Scholar.

19 Homeck, , The Happy Ascetick [: or The Best Exercise, Together with...a Letter to a Person of Quality, concerning the Holy Lives of the Primitive Christians] (5 ed London 1711, first published 1681) p 488 Google Scholar.

20 Portus, Caritas Anglicana, p 19.

21 Quoted in More, P. E. and Cross, F. L., Anglicanism (London 1935) p 141 Google Scholar, my emphasis. Compare The Diary of John Evelyn, ed Bray, W. (Everyman edition London 1907) 2 p 242 Google Scholar (October 2, 1685).

22 Horneck, The Happy Ascetick p 409; for a similar, though more radical, use of antiquity as a criticism of 17/18th century Christianity, see M. Schmidt in Oecimienica 1971/2 pp 88-98.

23 Every, [George], [The] High Church Party [1688-1718] (London 1950) pp 7–10 Google Scholar.

24 Burnet, Gilbert, The History of the Reformation of the Church of England. The Second Part (2 ed London 1683)Google Scholar preface (no pagination).

25 Nelson, [Robert], A Companion for the Festival and Fasts of the Church of England (24 ed London 1782, first published 1704) p vi Google Scholar; [An] Address [to Persons of Quality and Estate] (London 1715) pp 138-9.

26 Nelson, Address p 153.

27 Bahlman, Dudley W. R., The Moral Revolution of 1688 (Yale 1957) pp 67–70 Google Scholar.

28 Kidder, [Richard], [The] Life of [the Reverend Anthony] Horneck [D.D. Late Preacher at the Savoy] (London 1698) pp 45-7Google Scholar: read, Horneck and approved Josiah Woodward’s An Account of the Rise and Progress of the Religious Societies (London 1701)Google Scholar in which this claim was made.

29 Nelson, Address p 139.

30 Stephens, [Edward] [The Apology of] Socrates Christianus (London 1700)Google Scholar passim; A True Account of the Unaccountable Dealings of some Roman Catholick Missioners (London 1703) pp 14-52; Cane—Wood: OR, a Dialogue (no place or date) pp 4-10.

31 Russell, John, A Sermon Preach’d . . .June 28 1697 (London 1697) pp 441-2Google Scholar, 46-8.

32 Lilly Butler, A Sermon Preach’d . . . April 5 1697 p 15.

33 Woodward, Josiah, The Duty of Compassion to the Souls of Others, in endeavouring their Reformation (2 ed London 1698, preached December 28 1696) pp 53-5Google Scholar.

34 Burnet, Gilbert, Charitable Reproof. A Sermon Preached...21 March 1700 (London 1700) pp 26-7Google Scholar; Bradford, Samuel, A Sermon Preach’d . . . Oct 4th 1697 (London 1697)Google Scholar dedication, no pagination. Bradford was rector of St Mary’s where the reformation society sermons were preached. He was noted for his exercise of ‘discipline’ in excluding notorious sinners from communion—see Whiston, William, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Mr William Whiston (London 1749) pp 183-6Google Scholar; see also Whiston’s Primitive Christianity Reviv’d, 4 volumes (London 1712) 1, p 1 xxiii. St Mary-le-Bow was abo one of the two churches at which weekly communions were held for the religious societies.

An Account of the Societies for Reformation of Manners in London and Westminster, and other Parts of the Kingdom (London 1719, 1 ed 1699) p 113; Portus, Caritas Anglicana pp 223-8.

35 Kennett, White, A Sermon Preach’d . . . 29 December 1701 (London 1702) pp 45-6Google Scholar.

36 Reeves, William, The Apologies of Justin Martyr . . . with a Prefatory Dissertation about the Right Use of the Fathers (2 ed London 1716)Google Scholar dedication dated 22 June 1709, pp lxxv-lxxviii.

37 (Marshall, Nathaniel), The Penitential Discipline of the Primitive Church, Library of Anglo Catholic Theology (Oxford 1844, first published London 1714) pp 161-84Google Scholar.

38 Horneck, The Happy Ascetick p 515; Cave, Primitive Christianity pt 2 pp 318-402.

39 Kidder, Life of Horneck p 19.

40 Secretan, Pious Robert Nelson pp 46-80.

41 Stephens, [Edward], Reflections upon the occurences of the last Year (London 1689) pp 4–5 Google Scholar, 13-15, 20, 29; Socrates Christianus pt 2, pp 4-5; [A Seasonable and Necessary] Admonition [to the Gentlemen of the First Society for Reformation of Manners] (no place or date) p 4.

42 Stephens, Admonition p 6; An Apology for . . . the People call’d Quakers (London 1697) p 22.

43 These are to be found in Stephens, , [A Collection of] Tracts and Papers [Lately Written for the Service of the Church and Kingdom of England] (London 1702)Google Scholar

44 Stephens, Tracts and Papers, general preface p 9; Grabe, Johannes Ernst, Spicelegium SS Patrum ut et haereticorum seculi post Christum natum I, II et III, 2 vols (London 1698-9)Google Scholar; Green, [V. H. H.], [The Young Mr] Wesley (London 1967) pp 273-4Google Scholar; (Knight, J.) Primitive Christianity Vindicated, in a Second Letter to the Author of the History of Montanism (London 1712) p i Google Scholar.

45 Toland, John, Amyntor; or a Defence of Milton’s Life (London 1699) pp 12–45 Google Scholar.

46 Clarke, Samuel, Some Reflections on that part of a book called Amyntor . . . which relates to the Writings of the Primitive Fathers and the Canon of the New Testament (London) 1699 Google Scholar); Three practical Essays on Baptism, Confirmation and Repentance . . . with Earnest Exhortations . . . drawn from the Consideration of the Severity of the Discipline of the Primitive Church, in The Works of Revd Samuel Clarke, 4 vols (London 1738) 3 pp 569, 920; Whiston, [William], [Historical Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Dr Samuel] Clarke (3 ed London 1748) p 6 Google Scholar.

47 Every, High Church Party p 72n: Whiston, Clarke p 20-1.

48 Duffy, [E.]. ‘Whiston’s Affair; [the trials of a Primitive Christian 1709-1714’], JEH 27, 2 (April 1976) pp 129-50Google Scholar, esp 131-2.

49 Duffy, ‘Whiston’s Affair’ pp 134-6; compare Manuel, Frank E., The Religion of Isaac Newton (Oxford 1974) pp 53–75 Google Scholar.

50 Clarke, Samuel, The Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity (London 1712)Google Scholar.

51 For Hoadley’s later views on the use of the Fathers see Sykes, From Sheldon to Secker p 168.

52 Green, Wesley pp 271-6; Baker, Frank, John Wesley and the Church of England (London 1970) pp 30-4Google Scholar, 42-57.