Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:58:46.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why did the Crusader States Produce so Few Saints?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Bernard Hamilton*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham

Extract

The crusading movement was an important part of the attempt by the papal reformers of the eleventh century to integrate the turbulent and powerful warrior class of western Europe into Christian society. Pope Urban II’s aim was to persuade these fighting men to use their skills in defence of Christendom, and to form an armed force directed by the Church. Crusading would enable the warriors to combine their military abilities with the practice of the Christian life. This ideal later came to be accepted as normative by the armies of all Western states.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the very important work of Purkis, W.J., Crusading Spirituality in the Holy Land and Iberia c. 1095 — c. 1187 (Woodbridge, 2008), 1–119.Google Scholar

2 Morris, Colin, ‘San Ranieri of Pisa; The Power and Limitations of Sanctity in Twelfth-Century Italy’, JEH 45 (1994), 588–99 Google Scholar; Libellus de vita et miraculis s. Godrici auctore Reginaldo Dunelmensis, ed. J. Stevenson, SS 20 (1845).

3 ‘Liber ad Milites Templi: de laude novae militiae’, in S. Bernardi Opera, ed. Leclercq, J. and Rochais, H. M., 8 vols (Rome, 1957-77), 3: 312–39 Google Scholar; ET In Praise of the New Knighthood, intro. M. Barber, trans. M. C. Greenia, Cistercian Fathers 19B (Kalamazoo, MI, 2000).

4 Vita s. Bernardi Clarevallensis abbatis auctore Gaufrido monacho 3, in Acta SS Aug. 4, 327. Amalric’s gift is recorded in a list of reliquaries belonging to Clairvaux: Manrique, A., ed., Cisterciensium seu verius ecclesiasticorum annalium a condito Cistercio, 4 vols (Lyons, 1642-59), 2: 548Google Scholar(s.a. 1173, ch. 6, section 9).

5 Feast day 4 May: Acta SS Maii 1, 437. The attack is described by Albert of Aachen, Historia Ierosolimitana 12.9-11; ET S. B. Edgington, Oxford Medieval Texts (Oxford, 2007), 836–40.

6 Acta SS Maii 4, 135.

7 Acta SS Aug. 4, 398.

8 Jotischky, A., The Perfection of Solitude: Hermits and Monks in the Crusader States (University Park, PA, 1995), 139–51 Google Scholar; idem, The Carmelites and Antiquity: Mendicants and their Pasts in the Middle Ages (Oxford, 2002), 190–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 191.

9 Jotischky, A., ‘Albert of Vercelli (1149/1152-1214)’, in The Crusades: An Encyclopedia, ed. Murray, A.V., 4 vols (Santa Barbara, CA, 2006), 1:28.Google Scholar

10 See the case study: Head, T., Hagiography and the Cult of Saints: The Diocese of Orléans 800–1200 (Cambridge, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Hamilton, B., ‘“God wills it”: Signs of Divine Approval in the Crusade Movement’, in Cooper, K. and Gregory, J., eds, Signs, Wonders, Miracles: Representations of Divine Power in the Life of the Church, SCH 41 (Woodbridge, 2005), 88–98 Google Scholar, at 90–1.

12 Passio Thiemonis archiepiscopi (MGH S 11, 28–33, Riant, P., ‘Le martyre de Thiemo de Salzburg’, Revue des questions historiques 39 (1906), 218–37.Google Scholar

13 Feast day 26 April: Acta SS Apr. 3, 464–6.

14 See Knowles, David, ‘The Bollandists’, in idem, Great Historical Enterprises: Problems in Monastic History (London, 1963), 1–32.Google Scholar

15 Pringle, D., The Churches of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Corpus, 4 vols (Cambridge, 1993-2009)Google Scholar; de Sandoli, S., Itinera Hierosolymitana Crucesignatorum (saec. XII-XIII), 4 vols (Jerusalem, 1978-84).Google Scholar

16 Michael the Syrian, Chronicle 17.13; Syriac text ed. with French trans, by Chabot, J. B., Chronique de Michel le Syrien, 4 vols (Paris, 1899-1924), 3: 303–4.Google Scholar

17 Cahen, C., ‘Indigènes et croisés’, Syria 15 (1934), 351–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Kemp, E. W., Canonization and Authority in the Western Church (London, 1948), 56–141 Google Scholar; Goodich, M., ‘Vision, Dream and Canonization Policy under Pope Innocent III’, in Moore, J. C., ed., Pope Innocent III and his World (Aldershot, 1999), 151–63 Google Scholar; idem, Miracles and Wonders: The Development of the Concept of Miracle, 1150–1350 (Aldershot, 2007), 69–99 Google Scholar. See also Vauchez, A., Sainthood in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1997).Google Scholar

19 Barlow, F., Edward the Confessor (London, 1970), 256–85.Google Scholar

20 de Joinville, Jean, Histoire de Saint Louis, ed. de Wailly, N. (Paris, 1872)Google Scholar; Saint, J. Richard, Louis, Roi d’une France féodale, soutien de Terre sainte (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar

21 ‘B. Idae Vita, auctore monacho Wastensi coevo’, Acta SS Apr. 2: 141–5.

22 William of Tyre, Chronicon 9.5 (CChr.CM 63, 426–7). The Nine Worthies were Joshua, King David and Judas Maccabeus; Hector, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar; King Arthur, Charlemagne and Godfrey of Bouillon.

23 The Latin Patriarchs were Arnulf of Chocques (elected but not consecrated, July-December 1099); Daimbert of Pisa (December 1099 — 1101); Evremar of Chocques (1102–08); Gibelin of Arles (1108–12); Arnulf of Chocques (1112—18): Hamilton, B., The Latin Church in the Crusader States: The Secular Church (London, 1980), 12–16, 52–64.Google Scholar

24 Murray, A.V., Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Dynastic History 1099–1125, Prosopographica et Genealogica 4 (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar

25 Peter of Blois, ‘Passio Raginaldis principis Antiochie’, in Petri blesensis tractatus deo (CChr.CM 194, 31–73); Southern, R. W., ‘Peter of Blois and the Third Crusade’, in Studies in Medieval History presented to R. H. C. Davis, ed. Mayr-Harting, H. and Moore, R. I. (London, 1985), 207–18.Google Scholar

26 Saladin did not allow the Templars and Hospitallers captured at Hattin to be ransomed, but ordered them to be executed: Abu Shama, The Book of the Two Gardens (RHC Or. 4, 277–8).

27 Ibid. 275–6, 284–5, 298–9, 305; Kamal ad-Din, History of Aleppo, French trans. E. Blochet, Revue de l’Orient latin 4 (1896), 180–1; Baha al-Din Ibn Shaddad, The Rare and Excellent History of Saladin, trans. D. S. Richards (Aldershot, 2001), 74–5; The Chronicle of Ibn al-Athir for the Crusading Period, trans. Richards, D. S., 3 vols (Aldershot, 2006-8), 2: 323–4.Google Scholar

28 Peter does not specify which brother this was: Geoffrey of Lusignan and Aimery of Lusignan, Constable of the Kingdom and later King of Cyprus and of Jerusalem, were both present at the Batde of Hattin.

29 Gillingham, J., Richard I (New Haven, CT, 1999), 222–53.Google Scholar

30 Robinson, I. S., The Papacy 1073–1198: Continuity and Innovation (Cambridge, 1990;), 510–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bolton, Brenda M., ‘A Matter of Great Confusion: King Richard I and Syria’s Vetus de Monte’, in Beihammer, A. D., Parani, M. G. and Schabel, C. D., eds, Diplomatics in the Eastern Mediterranean 1000–1500: Aspects of Cross-Cultural Communication (Leiden, 2008), 171–203.Google Scholar

31 Warren, W. L., King John (London, 1964), 64–76.Google Scholar

32 Huygens, R. B. C., Introduction to Petri Blesensis tractatus duo (CChr.CM 194, 8–13)Google Scholar.

33 La Chronique d’Ernoul et de Bernard le Trésorier, ed. de Mas Latrie, L. (Paris, 1871)Google Scholar; L’Estoire d’Eracles empereur et la conqueste de la terre d’Outremer (RHC Oc. 1—2); Edbury, P. W., ‘The French translation of William of Tyre’s Historia: The Manuscript Tradition’, Crusades 6 (2007), 69–69.Google Scholar For the complex relations between the text of Ernoul and the Eracles in the years leading up to Hattin, see Hamilton, B., The Leper King and his Heirs (Cambridge, 2000), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Morgan, M. R., The Chronicle of Ernoul and the Continuations of William of Tyre (London, 1973), 136.Google Scholar

35 The Queens regnant of Jerusalem were Sybil (1186–90), wife of Guy of Lusignan; Isabella I (1190–1205), wife of (1) Conrad of Montferrat (d. 1192), (2) Henry of Troyes (d. 1197), (3) Aimery of Lusignan, King of Cyprus (d. 1205); Maria (1205–12), wife of John of Brienne; Isabella II (1212–28), wife of the Emperor Frederick II: Hamilton, B., ‘King Consorts of Jerusalem and their Entourages from the West from 1186–1250’, in Mayer, H.-E., ed., Die Kreuzfahrerstaaten als multikulturelle Gesellschaft, Schriften des historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 37 (Munich, 1997), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

36 Riley-Smith, J., The Feudal Monarchy and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, 1174–1277 (London, 1973).Google Scholar