Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:23:55.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2.1. ISOCAM CVF observations of the Quintuplet and Object#17 clusters near the galactic center. diffuse components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

T. Nagata
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-01, Japan
K. Kawara
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, Mitaka 181, Japan
T. Onaka
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113, Japan
Y. Kitamura
Affiliation:
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara 229, Japan
H. Okuda
Affiliation:
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Yoshinodai, Sagamihara 229, Japan

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are two star clusters near the Galactic Center which might be similar to the central parsec cluster. One is the Quintuplet cluster at (l = 0.16°, b = −0.06°), and the other is the Object #17 cluster at (l = 0.12°, b = 0.02°). The Quintuplet, first found in a polarimetric survey by Kobayashi et al. (1983), includes five very bright stars whose color temperatures are in the range of 600-900K (Okuda et al. 1990; Nagata et al. 1990). Object #17 is a cluster of emission line stars (Nagata et al. 1993, 1995; Cotera et al. 1996; Morris & Serabyn 1996). Spectral features of these two objects observed with the ISOCAM (Kessler et al. 1996; Cesarsky et al. 1996) have been reported (Nagata et al., 1996); absorption features due to O-H (2.8μm) CO2(4.3μm), and CO (4.7μm) are present. In this paper, we report diffuse emission components detected in these two fields.

Type
Part I. Stellar Cluster, Star Formation
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998 

References

Cesarsky, C. J., et al. 1996, A&A, 315, L32.Google Scholar
Cotera, A. S., Erickson, E. F., Colgan, W. J., Simpson, J. P., Allen, D. A., & Burton, M. G. 1996, ApJ, 461, 750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figer, D. F., McLean, I. S., & Morris, M. 1995, ApJ, 447, L29.Google Scholar
Kessler, M. F., et al. 1996, A&A, 315, L27.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Y., Okuda, H., Sato, S., Jugaku, J., & Dyck, H. M. 1983, PASJ, 35, 101.Google Scholar
Moneti, A., Glass, I. S., & Moorwood, A. F. M. 1994, MNRAS, 268, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. & Serabyn, E. 1996, ARA&A, 34, 645.Google Scholar
Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, M., Pipher, J. L., & Okuda, H. 1990, ApJ, 351, 83.Google Scholar
Nagata, T., Hyland, A. R., Straw, S. M., Sato, S., & Kawara, K. 1993, ApJ, 406, 501.Google Scholar
Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, , & Kobayashi, N. 1995, AJ, 109, 1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, T., Kawara, K., Onaka, T., Kitwamura, Y., Okuda, H. 1996, A&A, 315, L205.Google Scholar
Okuda, H., Shibai, H., Nakagawa, T., Matsuhara, H., Kobayashi, Y., Kaifu, N., Nagata, T., Gatley, I., & Geballe, T. R. 1990, ApJ, 351, 89.Google Scholar
Willner, S. P., Russel, R. W., Puetter, R. C., Soifer, B. T., & Harvey, P. M. 1979, ApJ, 229, L65.Google Scholar