Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T01:41:02.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concluding lecture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

F. Hoyle*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Undoubtedly the outstanding advance of the last few years in theoretical radio astronomy has been the widespread recognition of the importance of synchrotron radiation by relativistic electrons. The possibility that high-speed electrons might be of importance in the solar problem was mentioned by Giovanelli [1] and by me [2] in 1948. But real quantitative development in this direction dated from the well-known paper of Schwinger [3] published in 1949. Schwinger's results were put into a form suited to the problems of radio astronomy by Alfvén and Herlofson in 1950, still from the point of view of emission from stellar surfaces, however. In 1953, Ginzburg [5] and Shklovskiì [6] took the additional step of suggesting that relativistic electrons exist in space and that they give rise to the emission from nonthermal sources.

Type
Part VI: Mechanisms of Solar and Cosmic Emission
Copyright
Copyright © Stanford University Press 1959 

References

1. Giovanelli, R. G. Nature , 161, 133, 1948.Google Scholar
2. Hoyle, F. Some Recent Researches in Solar Physics. Cambridge, England, 1949, p. 117.Google Scholar
3. Schwinger, J. Phys. Rev. 75, 1912, 1949.Google Scholar
4. Alfvén, H., and Herlofson, N. Phys. Rev. 78, 616, 1950.Google Scholar
5. Ginzburg, V. L. Usp. Fiz. Nauk , 51, 343, 1953.Google Scholar
6. Shklovskiĭ, I. S. A. Zh. 30, 15, 1953.Google Scholar
7. J. Geophys. Res. 59, 180, 1954.Google Scholar
8. Dombrovskiĭ, V. A., and Vashakidze, M. H. Dokl. Akad. Nauk S.S.S.R. 94, 1021, 1954.Google Scholar
9. Baade, W. Ap. J. 123, 550, 1956.Google Scholar
10. Burbidge, G. R. Phys. Rev. 103, 264, 1956.Google Scholar