Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T10:43:33.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for Galaxy Formation at High Redshift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2016

Tom Shanks
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Nigel Metcalfe
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Dick Fong
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Henry McCracken
Affiliation:
LAS, Traverse du Siphon, Les Trois Lucs, F-13102 Marseille, France
Ana Campos
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matematicas y Fisica Fundamental, CSIC, Spain
David Thompson
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, MS 320-47, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Metcalfe et al. (1995, 1996) have shown that galaxy counts from the UV to the near-IR are well-fitted by simple evolutionary models where the space density of galaxies remains constant with look-back time while the star-formation rate rises exponentially. We now extend these results, first by using data from the Herschel Deep Field to show that these same models give detailed fits to the faint galaxy r - i : b - r colour-colour diagram. We then use these models to predict the number counts of high redshift galaxies detected by the Lyman break technique. At z ≈ 3 there is almost exact agreement between our prediction and the data, suggesting that the space density of galaxies at z ≈ 3 may be close to its local value. At z ≈ 4 the space density of bright galaxies remains unchanged; however, the space density of dwarf galaxies is significantly lower than it is locally, suggesting that we have detected an epoch of dwarf galaxy formation at z ≈ 4. Finally, significant numbers of Lyman-break galaxy candidates are also detected at z ≈ 6 in the Hubble and Herschel Deep Fields; taking this observation together with a number of recent detections of spectroscopically confirmed z ≈ 6 galaxies suggests that the space density of bright galaxies at z ≈ 6 remains comparable to the local space density, and thus that the epoch of formation of bright galaxies may lie at yet higher redshift.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Babul, A., & Rees, M. J. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barger, A. J., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinchmann, J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 499, 112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruzual, G., & Chariot, S. 1993, ApJ, 405, 538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busswell, G. S., & Shanks, T. 2000, MNRAS, in press, astro-ph/0002081 Google Scholar
Chen, H. W., Lanzetta, K. M., & Pascarelle, S. 1998, Nature, 398, 586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, L. L., Hu, E. M., Songaila, A., & Egami, E. 1997, ApJ, 481, L9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dey, A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 498, L93 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. P., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiderdoni, B., & Rocca-Volmerange, B. 1990, A&A, 227, 362 Google Scholar
Hughes, D. H., et al. 1998, Nature, 394, 241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, G., & Chariot, S. 1998, MNRAS, 297, L23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, D. C., Gronwall, C., & Bruzual, G. A. 1993, ApJ, 415, L21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, S. J., et al. 1995, ApJ, 455, 108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madau, P., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 1388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, N., Shanks, T., Fong, R., & Roche, N. 1995, MNRAS, 273, 257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, N., et al. 1996, Nature, 383, 236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, N., et al. 2000, MNRAS, in press, astro-ph/0010153 Google Scholar
Shanks, T., et al. 1998, in ASP Conference Series Vol. 146, The Young Universe: Galaxy Formation and Evolution at Intermediate and High Redshift, ed. D'Odorico, S., Fontana, A., & Giallongo, E. (San Francisco: ASP), 102 Google Scholar
Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., & Blain, A. W. 1997, ApJ, 450, L5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinrad, H., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 2617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steidel, C. C., et al. 1999, ApJ, 519, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teplitz, H. I., Gardner, J. P., Malumuth, E. M., & Heap, S. R. 1998, ApJ, 507, L17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. I., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weymann, R. J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 505, L95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E., et al. 1996, ApJ, 112, 1335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. E., et al. 2000, ApJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Yan, L., McCarthy, P. J., Storrie-Lombardi, L. J., & Weymann, R. J. 1998, ApJ, 503, L19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshii, Y., & Takahara, F. 1988, ApJ, 326, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar