No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Fine Structure of Photospheric Faculae
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2017
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Properties of the photospheric bright points associated with magnetic flux tubes are reviewed both in faculae (facular points) and in the photospheric network (network bright points - NBPs) out of active regions. A special attention is given to their size distribution, to their location relative to the granular, mesogranular and supergranular patterns, and to their relation with the small scale magnetic features, both in active and quiet regions. In particular a new granulation movie reveals that NBPs form in large intergranular spaces, compressed by the surrounding granules.
At the center of the solar disk, bright points are much brighter than the mean photosphere; their contrast increases toward the limb up to μ = 0.3 − 0.2 and then decreases to the limb, as it is now widely accepted. But, all the published contrasts are of little significance because of center-to-limb selection effects. New center-to-limb contrast variations of individual network bright points are presented, which take into account the selection effects.
- Type
- II. Photospheric Fine Structure
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Kluwer 1990
References
Chapman, G.A. and Sheeley, N.R. (1968) ‘The photospheric network’, Solar Phys.
5, 442-Google Scholar
Harvey, J.W. (1977) ‘Photospheric magnetic and velocity fields in active regions’, in Müller, E.A. (ed.), Highlights of Astronomy, 4, 223.Google Scholar
Hirayama, T., Hamano, S. and Mizugaki, K. (1985) ‘Precise wideband photometry of photospheric faculae with an emphases on the disk center’, Solar Phys.
99, 43.Google Scholar
Hirayama, T. and Moriyama, F. (1979) ‘Center-to-limb variation of the intensity of the photospheric faculae’, Solar Phys.
63, 251.Google Scholar
Martin, S.F. (1988) ‘The identification and interaction of network, intranetwork and ephemeral-region magnetic fields’, Solar Phys.
117, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehltretter, J.P. (1974) ‘Observations of photospheric faculae at the center of the solar disk’, Solar Phys.
38, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (1975) ‘A model of photospheric faculae deduced from white light high resolution pictures’, Solar Phys.
45, 105–114.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1977) ‘Morphological properties and origin of the photospheric facular granules’, Solar Phys.
52, 249–262.Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1983) ‘The dynamical behavior of facular points in the quiet photosphere’, Solar Phys.
85, 113–121.Google Scholar
Muller, R. and Keil, S.L. (1983) ‘The characteristic size and brightness of facular points in the quiet photosphere’, Solar Phys.
87, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. and Mena, B. (1987) ‘Motions around a decaying sunspot’, Solar Phys.
112, 295–303.Google Scholar
Muller, R. and Roudier, Th. (1984) ‘Variability of the quiet photospheric network’, Solar Phys.
94, 33–47.Google Scholar
Muller, R., Roudier, Th. and Hulot, J.C. (1989) ‘Perturbation of the granular pattern by the presence of magnetic flux tubes’, Solar Phys.
119, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüssler, M. and Solanki, S.K. (1988) ‘Continuum intensity of magnetic flux concentrations: are magnetic elements bright points?’, Astron. Astrophys.
192, 338–342.Google Scholar
Spruit, H.C. and Zwaan, C. (1981) ‘The size dependance of contrasts and numbers of small magnetic flux tubes in an active region’, Solar Phys.
70, 207–228.Google Scholar
Stenflo, J.O. (1973) ‘Magnetic-field structure of the photospheric network’, Solar Phys.
32, 41–63.Google Scholar
Title, A.M., Tarbell, T.O. and Topka, K.P. (1987) ‘On the relation between magnetic field structures and granulation’, Astrophys. J.
317, 892–899.Google Scholar
You have
Access