Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-g7ldn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-20T20:53:20.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving-Image Astrometry With the Multi-Anode Microchannel Array (MAMA) Detector

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Jeffrey D. Scargle*
Affiliation:
Theoretical Studies Branch, Space Science Division, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035 USA (415-965-6330)

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider the possible astrometric use of the following concept: If the image of a field of stars is moved past a high-speed detector array at a precisely known velocity, relative positions can be determined by measuring time intervals. Attractive features of this approach are: times can be measured very accurately with photoelectric detectors; a relatively large area of the sky may be swept for reference stars; the images are measured essentially on-axis; and seeing effects can be partially frozen out. The only available detector with spatial and temporal resolution and stability adequate for this technique is the MAMA. A rudimentary observational test with this detector has yielded promising results. Further observations are planned to determine whether milliarcsecond accuracy can be obtained.

Information

Type
V. Small Field Photoelectric Astrometry
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Brown, R.A. 1982, “Report on ST Particulate Contamination” Google Scholar
Butcher, H.R., Joseph, C.L., and Timothy, J.G. 1982, “Speckle spectroscopy: an application for the multi-anode microchannel array detector system,” in S.P.I.E. Instrumentation in Astronomy IV, Vol. 331, p. 311.Google Scholar
Drake, F. 1961, P.A.S.P., 72, 494. “The Position-Determination Program of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory” Google Scholar
Gatewood, G., Breakiron, L., Goebel, R., Kipp, S., Russell, J., and Stein, J. 1980, in “An Assessment of Ground-Based Techniques for Detecting Other Planetary Systems, Volume II: Position Papers.” NASA Conference Publication 2124, ed. Black, D. and Brunk, W. E. Google Scholar
Høg, E. 1974, “Modern Developments of the Meridian Circle,” in eds. Gliese, , Murray, , and Tucker, , New Problems in Astrometry, I.A.U. Symposium No. 61, D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht-Holland, p. 243.Google Scholar
King, I.R. 1971, “The Profile of a Star Image,” P.A.S.P., 83, 199.Google Scholar
King, I.R. 1983, “Accuracy of Measurement of Star Images on a Pixel Array,” preprint.Google Scholar
Monet, D. 1981, S.P.I.E., 290, [Solid State Imagers for Astronomy], 208. “Precision Astrometry and the Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) 4-m/Charge-Couple Device (CCD) Parallax Program” Google Scholar
Papoulis, A. 1965, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Timothy, J.G., Joseph, C.L., and Wolff, S.C., 1982, “High-Resolution Spectroscopy with the Multi-Anode Microchannel Array Detector Systems,” in S.P.I.E. Instrumentation in Astronomy IV, Vol. 331, p. 301.Google Scholar
Young, A.T. 1974, Ap. J., 189, 587. “Seeing: Its Cause and Cure” Google Scholar