Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:00:56.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planetary Nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2016

B. Louise Webster
B. Louise Webster*
Affiliation:
Anglo-Australian Observatory, P.O. Box 296, Epping, N.S.W. 2121, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Selection effects in the search for planetary nebulae in the Magellanic Clouds have not seriously distorted the observed space distribution, but have affected the apparent excitation classes. A difference between the properties of the SMC and LMC planetaries remains. A group of high-excitation nebulae with strong lines of He and N has been isolated. If these are excluded, the helium abundance appears to be normal in each Cloud. The oxygen abundance in LMC planetaries is about half the Orion value and may be even lower in the SMC objects. The significance of the abundances, excitation classes and space distribution is briefly discussed.

Type
Session I: The Distribution of Planetary Nebulae
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 76: Planetary Nebulae , 1978 , pp. 11 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1978 

References

Aller, L.H. & Czyzak, S.J., 1973. Mem. Soc. Roy. Sci. Liège, V, 285.Google Scholar
Bohannan, B. & Epps, H.W., 1974. Astron. Astrophys., 18, 47.Google Scholar
Danziger, I.J., Dopita, M.A., Hawarden, T.G. & Webster, B.L., 1977. preprint.Google Scholar
Dufour, R.J., 1975. Astrophys. J., 195, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, R.J. & Killen, R.M., 1977. Astrophys. J., 211, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feast, M.W., 1968. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 140, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henize, K.G., 1956. Astrophys. J. Suppl., 2, 315.Google Scholar
Henize, K.G. & Westerlund, B.E., 1963. Astrophys. J., 137, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummer, D.G. & Seaton, M.J., 1964. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 127, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, D.L., 1968. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 138, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmer, P.S., 1976. Astrophys. J., 203, 352.Google Scholar
Payne-Gaposchkin, C.H., 1974. Smithsonian Contr. 16.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M. & Torres-Peimbert, S., 1977. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 179, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peimbert, M. & Costero, R., 1969. Bol. Ton. y Tac., 5, 3.Google Scholar
Sanduleak, N., MacConnell, D.J. & Hoover, P., 1972. Nature, 237, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.G. & Weedman, D.W., 1972. Astrophys. J., 177, 595.Google Scholar
Tifft, W.G. & Snell, C.M., 1971. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 151, 365.Google Scholar
Webster, B.L., 1969a. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 143, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, B.L., 1969b. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 143, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, B.L., 1975. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 173, 437.Google Scholar
Webster, B.L., 1976. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 174, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, B.L., 1977. Publ. astron. Soc. Pac., 88, 669.Google Scholar
Westerlund, B.E., 1968. I.A.U. Symp. No. 34, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerlund, B.E. & Smith, L.F., 1964. Mon. Not. Roy. astr. Soc., 127, 449.Google Scholar