Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:59:13.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spiral Galaxy - ICM Interactions in the Virgo Cluster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Jeffrey D. P. Kenney
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Hugh Crowl
Affiliation:
Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Jacqueline van Gorkom
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Bernd Vollmer
Affiliation:
Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss HI and optical evidence for ongoing ICM-ISM interactions in 6 Hi-deficient Virgo cluster spiral galaxies. One of the clearest cases is the highly inclined Virgo galaxy NGC 4522, which has a normal stellar disk but a truncated gas disk, and lots of extraplanar gas right next to the gas truncation radius in the disk. Unusually strong HI, Hα and radio continuum emission are all detected from the extraplanar gas. The radio continuum polarized flux and spectral index peak on the side opposite the extraplanar gas, suggesting ongoing pressure by the ICM. Four other HI-deficient edge-on Virgo spirals show evidence of extraplanar ISM gas or exhibit asymmetries in their disk HI distributions, but contain much less extraplanar HI than NGC 4522. Comparison with recent simulations suggests this difference may be evolutionary, with large surface densities of extraplanar gas observed only in early phases of an ICM-ISM interaction. In NGC 4569, the Hα image shows 2 effects of ICM pressure on the galaxy ISM. An anomalous arm of HII regions, possibly extraplanar, emerges from the edge of a truncated Hα disk. This resembles the arms seen in simulations which are formed by the combined effects of wind pressure plus rotation. An extended nebulosity near the minor axis, also in the NW, is interpreted as a starburst outflow bubble disturbed by ICM wind pressure.

Type
Part 3. Ejection and Outflow
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Bravo-Alfaro, H., Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., & Balkowski, C. 2001, A&A, 379, 347.Google Scholar
Butcher, H., & Oemler, G. D. 1978, ApJ, 219, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayatte, V., van Gorkom, J. H., Balkowski, C., & Kotanyi, C. 1990, AJ, 100, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, A. 1980, ApJ, 236, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupke, R. A., & Bregman, J. N. 2001, ApJ, 562, 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, R. & Haynes, M. P., 1983, AJ, 88, 881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabel, J. R. & Bruhweiler, F. C. 2002, AJ, 124, 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, J. E., & Gott, J. R., 1972, ApJ, 176, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, J. D. P., & Koopmann, R. A. 1999, AJ, 117, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, J.D.P., van Gorkom, J.H., & Vollmer, B. 2003, AJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Koopmann, R. A. & Kenney, J. D. P. 2003, ApJ, in press (astro-ph/0209547).Google Scholar
Koopmann, R. A., Kenney, J. D. P., Young, J. 2001, ApJS, 135, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggianti, B. M., Smail, I., Dressler, A., Couch, W. J., Barger, A. J., Butcher, H., Ellis, R. S., & Oemler, A. Jr. 1999, ApJ, 518, 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, S, Binggeli, B., & Böhringer, H. 1999, A&A, 343, 420.Google Scholar
Schulz, S., & Struck, C. 2001, MNRAS, 328 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solanes, J. M., Sanchis, T., Salvador-Sola, E. G., Giovanelli, R., & Haynes, M. P. 2002 AJ, 124, 2440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschoke, D., Bomans, D. J., Hensler, G., & Junkes, N. 2001, A&A, 380, 40.Google Scholar
van Gorkom, J. H. 2003, Carnegie Observatory Astrophysics Series, Vol. 3: Clusters of Galaxies: Probes of Cosmological Structure and Galaxy Evolution ed. Mulchaey, J.S., Dressler, A., and Oemler, A. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Press), astro-ph/0308209.Google Scholar
Vollmer, B., Beck, R., Kenney, J.D.P., van Gorkom, J.H., & 2003, AJ, submitted.Google Scholar
Vollmer, B., Cayatte, V., Balkowski, C., & Duschl, W. J. 2001, ApJ, 561, 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollmer, B., & Huchtmeier, W. 2003, A&A, 406, 427.Google Scholar
Warmels, R., 1988, A&ASupp, 72, 19.Google Scholar
Yoshida, M. et al 2004, AJ, 127, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar