Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T23:16:57.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UHURU Results on Galactic X-Ray Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Harvey D. Tananbaum
Harvey D. Tananbaum*
Affiliation:
American Science and Engineering, 955 Mass. Ave., Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Galactic X-ray sources studied by UHURU can be classified into several categories, including supernova remnants, transient or nova-like sources, Sco X-1 like sources, and pulsating sources. The latter are discussed in some detail with particular emphasis upon the characteristics of the periodic binary X-ray sources, Cen X-3 and Her X-1. It is suggested that all galactic X-ray sources (except S/N remnants) may be binary systems.

Type
Part I: Galactic Sources
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 55: X- and Gamma-Ray Astronomy , 1973 , pp. 9 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1973 

References

Bolton, C. T.: 1972, Nature 235, 271.Google Scholar
Bradt, H. and Kunkel, W.: 1971, private communication. Google Scholar
Braes, L. and Miley, G. K.: 1971, Nature 232, 246.Google Scholar
Brucato, R. J. and Kristian, J.: 1972, Astrophys. J. Letters 173, L105.Google Scholar
Burbidge, G.: 1972, Comm. Astrophys. Space Phys., to be published.Google Scholar
Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreier, E., and Tananbaum, H.: 1972, Astrophys. J., to be published.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, S. and Matsuoka, M.: 1964, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 30, 204.Google Scholar
Hiltner, W. A. and Osmer, P.: 1972, IAU Circular, No. 2398 (and private communication).Google Scholar
Hjellming, R. M. and Wade, C. M.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 168, L21.Google Scholar
Holt, S., Boldt, E., Schwartz, D., Serlemitsos, P., and Bleach, R.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 166, L65.Google Scholar
Kellogg, E. and Murray, S.: 1971, private communication Google Scholar
Leong, C., Kellogg, E., Gursky, H., Tananbaum, H., and Giacconi, R.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 170, L67.Google Scholar
Price, R. E., Groves, D. J., Rodrigues, S. M., Seward, F., Swift, C. D., and Toor, A.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 168, L7.Google Scholar
Pringle, J. E. and Rees, M. J.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys., to be published.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S., Doxsey, R., and Zaumen, W.: 1971a, Astrophys. J. Letters 168, L43.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S., Zaumen, W., and Doxsey, R.: 1971b, Astrophys. J. Letters 168, L17.Google Scholar
Schreier, E., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Tananbaum, H., and Giacconi, R.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 170, L21.Google Scholar
Seward, F. D., Burginyon, G. A., Grader, R. J., Hill, R. W., and Palmieri, T. M.: 1972, to be published.Google Scholar
Shulman, S., Fritz, G., Meekins, J., and Friedman, H.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 168, L49.Google Scholar
Webster, L. and Murdin, P.: 1972, Nature 235, 37.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E.: 1972, Astrophys. J. Letters 174, L27.Google Scholar