Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-7x8lp Total loading time: 0.365 Render date: 2021-03-05T11:10:03.415Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Article contents

MUSICAL FRAGILITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXAMINATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Abstract

While fragility is typically defined as ‘the quality of being easily broken or damaged’, within a musical framework the term can be understood through a myriad of causal lenses. One must consider what can be ‘broken’ or damaged’ in a musical context, and secondly how this sense of impairment might present itself. This article offers an extensive categorisation of musical fragility, and a characterisation of it in its numerous forms across the works of a broad range of composers. Through classification, a distinction between local and large-scale fragility emerges. A typology of fragilities makes it possible both to identify them in works that might not necessarily be considered fragile and to identify works that use combinations of fragility types. This classification involves ten types, with compositions from new and experimental acoustic music offered as examples.

Type
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1 Eva-Maria Houben, Presence – Silence – Disappearance: Some thoughts on the perceptions of ‘nearly nothing’. Edition Wandelweiser website, www.timescraper.de/_eva-maria-houben/texts-e.html#Houben_Presence (accessed 25 February 2016).

2 Properties of fragility are often argued by philosophers in discussions of dispositions. In particular, the focus has been on whether a disposition is causally relevant, i.e. whether fragility is causally relevant to breaking. See McKitrick, Jennifer, “Are Dispositions Causally Relevant?”, Synthese 144, no. 3 (2005), pp. 357–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Ihde, Don, Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound, second edition (Albany: SUNY Press, 2007), p. 51 Google Scholar.

4 However, a stable element does not need to be a constant.

5 Ihde, Listening and Voice, p. 223.

6 Instances of the term ‘fragility’ found in writings on music include Boutwell's description of the texture in Morton Feldman's Four Instruments ( Boutwell, Brett, ‘“The Breathing of Sound Itself”: Notation and Temporality in Feldman's Music to 1970’, Contemporary Music Review 32, no. 6 (2013), pp. 531570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); Harrison's discussion on the work of Aldo Clementi as ‘certain quality of fragility’ ( Harrison, Brynn, ‘The Tempo of Enclosed Spaces: A Short, Personal Reflection on the Ensemble Music of Aldo Clementi’, Contemporary Music Review 30, no. 3–4 (2011), pp. 269274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar); and Frasch's depiction of the structural architecture of her piece the silence that reigns … as ‘too fragile to exist in the physical world’. (Heather Frasch, the silence that reigns … (2011). Unpublished Manuscript and Programme Note, https://heatherfrasch.wordpress.com/2012/09/29 (accessed 22 March 2017)). Although without reference to a specific piece, Schroeder's article on ‘networked listening’ focuses on a discussion of the fragility of the performative body and of the listening experience (see Schroeder, Franziska, ‘Network[ed] Listening–Towards a De-centering of Beings’, Contemporary Music Review 32, no. 2–3 (2013), pp. 215229 Google Scholar).

7 Thurley, Oliver, ‘Disappearing Sounds: Fragility in the Music of Jakob Ullman’, TEMPO 69 (2015), pp. 521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Note that I will use the terms sonic fragility and musical fragility interchangeably.

9 Kunsu Shim, Second Skin (2012), Düsseldorf, Germany. Unpublished Manuscript.

10 Casey Anderson, honey (2015), Düsseldorf, Germany. Unpublished Manuscript.

11 Kunsu Shim, Apart (2000), Duisburg, Germany. Unpublished Manuscript.

12 Shim, Apart.

13 Alwynne Pritchard, Objects of Desire (2010), Berlin: Verlag Neue Musik.

14 Pritchard, Objects of Desire.

15 Megan Beugger, Daring Doris (2012). Unpublished Manuscript and Programme Note.

16 Beugger, Daring Doris.

17 Beugger, Daring Doris.

18 Ihde, Listening and Voice, p. 51.

19 Pauline Oliveros, Sonic Meditations (Baltimore, MD: Smith Publications, 1974), p. xxii.

20 Peter Ablinger, English Texts, http://ablinger.mur.at/engl.html (accessed 20 February 2016).

21 Eva-Maria Houben, pismo beach (2007). Berlin: Edition Wandelweiser.

22 Houben, pismo beach.

23 In his Rauschen (white noise) series, Peter Ablinger explores this through varying levels of white noise that sometimes eclipses the acoustic instruments’ sound, while at other times equally shares the acoustic space, or shadows the instruments.

24 Martin, Agnes, ‘Writings’, in Agnes Martin: Writings, ed. Schwarz, Dieter (Stuttgart: Cantz, 1993), p. 31 Google Scholar.

25 Amacher, Maryanne, ‘Psychoacoustic Phenomenon in Musical Composition: Some Features of a “Perceptual Geography”’. Arcana III: Musicians on Music, ed. Zorn, John (New York: Hips Road, 2008), pp. 924 Google Scholar.

26 Amacher, Liner Notes to Sound Characters: Making the Third Ear. Tzadik, 1999.

27 Stefany Anne Golberg, ‘Sound Envisioned’, The Smart Set, http://thesmartset.com/article07111401/ (accessed 14 March 2016).

28 Chiyoko Szlavnics Website, www.chiyokoszlavnics.org/journey4.html (accessed 25 February 2016).

29 Metzer, David, ‘Modern Silence’, The Journal of Musicology, 23 (2006), pp. 331–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Bernhard Lang, Differenz/Wiederholung (2002). Vienna: Zeitvertrieb. Available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaBOZ8iOlbQ (accessed 23 February 2016).

31 Eric Wubbles, This is This is This is (2009–10), www.wubbelsmusic.com/pieces_Thisis.html (accessed 19 February 2016).

32 Jürg Frey, More or Less Normal (2005–07). Berlin: Edition Wandelweiser.

33 Oliveros, Sonic Meditations.

34 James Saunders, Choose who tells you what to do (2014). Unpublished Manuscript.

35 Birkhofer, Denise, ‘Eva Hesse and Mira Schendel: Voiding the Body – Embodying the Void’, Woman's Art Journal 31, no. 2 (2010), pp, 311 Google Scholar, here p. 7.

36 Michael Baldwin, Reflections on Ephemerality and Notation in My Recent Work (Master's Research Thesis, University of Huddersfield, 2012).

37 Michael Baldwin, Ephemera #6 (2012). Unpublished Manuscript.

38 Baldwin, Reflections on Ephemerality, p. 6.

39 Nakai, You and Hoffman, Elizabeth, ‘The Music of Ellen C. Covito: An Interview with You Nakai’, Perspectives of New Music 51, no. 1 (2013), pp. 520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 8.

40 Ellen Covito, Composed Improvisation G (2014). Available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvPFdPwRpow (accessed 14 March 2016).

41 Aaron Cassidy, The Crutch of Memory (2004). Buffalo: Aaron Cassidy/ASCAP.

42 Kanno, Mieko, ‘Prescriptive Notation: Limits and Challenges’, Contemporary Music Review 26 no. 2 (2007), p. 251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Mieko Shiomi, Mirror Piece No. 2 (1966), in Fluxus Performance Workbook. Performance Research e-publication, ed. K. Friedman, O. Smith, L. Sawchyn. (2002).

44 George Aperghis, Shot in the Dark (2011),  https://vimeo.com/45924688 (accessed 12 February 2016).

45 Aperghis, Composer's Notes: Shot in the Dark (2011), www.aperghis.com/etc./archives/01-2016 (accessed 21 February 2016).

46 Manfred Werder, stück 1998 (1998). Berlin: Edition Wandelweiser. This is reminiscent of John Cage's Organ2/ASLSP for which the composer has left the instruction ‘as slow as possible’, and, hence, the piece's duration, open to interpretation. It is currently in the midst of a 639-year-long performance in Halberstadt, Germany.

47 The performer must contact the composer indicating the duration of the intended performance to obtain the next pages of the score, and instruction to begin at the point in the score where the last performance left off. Thus far sections have been performed over 17 years, beginning in March 1999.

48 Werder, Note on stuck 1998 seiten 1–4000, http://manfred-werder-archives.blogspot.com/2012/07/note-on-stuck-1998-seiten-1-4000.html (accessed 24 February 2016).

49 Jürg Frey, One Instrument, Series (1999). Berlin: Edition Wandelweiser.

50 Pascale Criton, Biography (2007), www.pascalecriton.com/en/biography (accessed Retrieved 15 March 2016).

51 Pascale Criton and Deborah Walker, Chaoscacci (2013). Unpublished Manuscript.

52 Harry Partch, (1930/33). ‘The Rose’ from 17 Lyrics of Li Po, available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOwu-feB11k 9 (accessed 23 February 2016).

53 Scott Cazan, Intercept for two string players and sine tones (2015). Unpublished Manuscript.

54 Cazan, Intercept for two string players and sine tones, available at https://vimeo.com/152230520 (accessed 2 March 2016).

55 John Luther Adams, Sila: The Breath of the World (2014), www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUDjOyacZoU (accessed 10 February 2016).

56 Agnes Martin, Writings, ed. Dieter Schwarz (Ostfildern: Cantz, 1991), p. 15.

57 Agnes Martin. White Stone, www.guggenheim.org/artwork/2804 (accessed 22 February 2016).

58 Chaya Czernowin, Adiantum Capillus-Veneris (1) ‘Etude in fragility for voice and breath’ (2015), https://soundcloud.com/resonantbodies/jeff-gavett-czernowin-1 (accessed 23 February 2016).

59 Ryoko Akama, acorn for a.pe.ri.od.ic (2015). Unpublished Manuscript.

60 Akama, acorn for a.pe.ri.od.ic.

61 Catherine Lamb, overlays, transparent/opaque (2013). Unpublished Manuscript.

62 Klaus Lang, Der Weg des Prinzen I (Die Sieben Boten) (1996). Vienna: Zeitvertrieb Edition Partitur. Available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_vIiyumDh0 (accessed 22 February 2016).

63 Rebecca Saunders, Stirrings Still (2006). Recorded by Ensemble Musikfabrik on Stirrings Still (Wergo, 6694 2).

64 Michael Pisaro, Fade (2000). Berlin: Edition Wandelweiser.

65 Knakkergaard, Martin, ‘The Music That's Not There’, in The Oxford Handbook of Virtuality, ed. Grimshaw, Mark (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 392 Google Scholar.

66 Brian Chappel, Ephemeral Architecture: Towards a Definition (2004), www.scribd.com/doc/44042590/Ephemeral-Architecture (accessed 27 February 2016).

67 Ihde, Listening and Voice, p. 233.

68 Ihde, Listening and Voice, p. 233.

69 Birkhofer, ‘Eva Hesse and Mira Schendel’, p. 7.

70 Michael Pisaro, Time's Underground. (1997). Edition Wandelweiser. See www.timescraper.de/_michael-pisaro/texts.html#Times_Underground (accessed 20 February 2016).

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 35
Total number of PDF views: 194 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st June 2017 - 5th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

MUSICAL FRAGILITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

MUSICAL FRAGILITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

MUSICAL FRAGILITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL EXAMINATION
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *