Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-qdp55 Total loading time: 0.314 Render date: 2021-11-28T02:25:17.917Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa: 18-year outcome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Elisabet Wentz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, and Vårdal Institute, Swedish Institute for Health Sciences, Sweden
I. Carina Gillberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, Sweden
Henrik Anckarsäter
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
Christopher Gillberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, Sweden, and Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK
Maria Råstam
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
Dr Elisabet Wentz, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Göteborg University, Otterhällegatan 12 B, SE–411 18 Göteborg, Sweden. Email: elisabet.wentz@vgregion.se
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa is insufficiently researched.

Aims

To study prospectively the long-term outcome and prognostic factors in a representative sample of people with teenage-onset anorexia nervosa.

Method

Fifty-one people with anorexia nervosa, recruited by community screening and with a mean age at onset of 14 years were compared with 51 matched comparison individuals at a mean age of 32 years (18 years after disorder onset). All participants had been examined at ages 16 years, 21 years and 24 years. They were interviewed for Axis I psychiatric disorders and overall outcome (Morgan–Russell assessment schedule and the Global Assessment of Functioning).

Results

There were no deaths. Twelve per cent (n=6) had a persisting eating disorder, including three with anorexia nervosa. Thirty-nine per cent of the anorexia nervosa group met the criteria for at least one psychiatric disorder. The general outcome was poor in 12%. One in four did not have paid employment owing to psychiatric problems. Poor outcome was predicted by premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder, age at onset of anorexia nervosa and autistic traits.

Conclusions

The 18-year outcome of teenage-onset anorexia nervosa is favourable in respect of mortality and persisting eating disorder.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2009 

Anorexia nervosa is one of the most severe psychiatric disorders found in adolescence. In most cases the teenager will gradually recover from the illness, but anorexia nervosa is also known for its severe complications, with chronicity and death being the two most feared consequences. In Steinhausen's review of all follow-up studies during the second half of the 20th century, chronicity occurred in one in five of all anorexia nervosa cases. Reference Steinhausen1 There are only three published studies on anorexia nervosa that report long-term outcome. Reference Theander2Reference Zipfel, Lowe, Reas, Deter and Herzog4 All three are based on severe cases of anorexia nervosa, with a sample of only tertiary referrals and/or in-patients. The high mortality rates in these studies (17%, 18% and 16% respectively) corresponded in the study by Zipfel et al to a standardised mortality ratio of 9.8. Reference Zipfel, Lowe, Reas, Deter and Herzog4 The occurrence of chronic anorexia nervosa in the three studies ranged from 8 to 25%. Researchers have indicated that recovery after 10–12 years is uncommon. Reference Theander2,Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5 However, a growing number of follow-up studies have focused on more homogeneous anorexia nervosa samples, i.e. only individuals with teenage-onset anorexia nervosa who seem to have a brighter future. Long-term studies (10 years or more) of adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa tend to report more favourable outcomes compared with other follow-up studies. Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5Reference Nilsson and Hägglöf8

Since the mid-1980s our group has conducted the only controlled, prospective community-based study of adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa. Reference Berkman, Lohr and Bulik9 So far we have reported on the anorexia nervosa group and their matched controls on three occasions, at mean ages 16 years, 21 years and 24 years. There has been no attrition. In this paper we report our fourth study, 18 years after anorexia nervosa onset. We predicted a better general outcome and less psychiatric comorbidity compared with other long-term outcome studies based on in-patient data, and also that a comparison of general outcome and psychiatric comorbidity with the control group would reveal continuing difficulties in our community-based anorexia nervosa group in spite of the high rate of recovery from the eating disorder.

Method

Original study (Study 1)

In 1985 all 4291 individuals born in 1970 in the Swedish city of Göteborg were screened for anorexia nervosa in the eighth grade of junior high school using individual physical examinations in all cases, analysis of growth charts and an eating disorders questionnaire. Reference Rastam, Gillberg and Garton10 Twenty-three girls and two boys constituted the total population of individuals born in 1970 who developed anorexia nervosa before the age of 18 years. These 25 cases correspond to a population prevalence of anorexia nervosa in those aged 17 years and under of 1.08% for girls and 0.09% for boys, and a population-corrected female:male ratio of 11.6:1. The details of the epidemiological study have been published previously. Reference Rastam, Gillberg and Garton10,Reference Rastam11 One girl agreed only to examination by the school health services, leaving 24 individuals (22 girls, 2 boys) for in-depth study. Because all the teenagers in this birth cohort were examined without their clothes on, had their growth charts scrutinised in detail and were followed up for at least a year by the same school nurse, and because 99.7% of them completed an anorexia nervosa screening questionnaire, we believe that we did not miss a single case of anorexia nervosa in this cohort.

The population group was pooled with another population screening sample of anorexia nervosa cases (26 girls, 1 boy), who were reported to the research team mainly by school health nurses and doctors during follow-up of the original population group. Almost all of these individuals were born in 1971–4. This sample was less comprehensive than the original one. We estimated that the population screening sample comprised about 60% of all anorexia nervosa cases in their birth cohort. The total examined anorexia nervosa group thus consisted of 51 cases (48 girls, 3 boys) who all met or had met the DSM–III–R and DSM–IV criteria for anorexia nervosa. 12,13

Comparison group

For each of the 51 cases of anorexia nervosa the school nurse selected the same-sex classmate closest in age to the index child. The only exclusion criteria for individuals in the comparison group were a history of eating disturbances according to school nurses' reports and growth chart deviances from age 7 years and onwards.

In the original study all 102 individuals (51 individuals in the anorexia nervosa group and 51 individuals in the comparison group) and their mothers were seen by a psychiatrist (M.R.). Within the year of assessment in the original study all 51 individuals in the anorexia nervosa group fulfilled DSM–III–R and DSM–IV criteria for anorexia nervosa, although at the precise time of examination 6 individuals in the anorexia nervosa group had bulimia nervosa and 6 further individuals at that time only partially fulfilled anorexia nervosa criteria and were diagnosed with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) (Fig. 1). The individuals who had crossed over from anorexia nervosa to other eating disorders were not excluded from the original study or the subsequent follow-up studies.

Fig. 1 Eating disorders in the four studies of this cohort. In Study 4, only individuals with a persisting eating disorder are presented. AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; EDNOS, eating disorder not otherwise specified; NO ED, no eating disorder.

A detailed developmental history was obtained for each child by interviewing the mother. The mothers were asked about eating disturbances from childhood onwards as well as current eating disorders. An evaluation of pregnancy, obstetrical and other medical records was made. On the basis of anonymised case notes on premorbid history, the 102 participants were assigned diagnoses of DSM–III–R personality disorders and autism-spectrum conditions by a senior psychiatrist (C.G.) who was masked to group status.

Follow-up studies (Studies 2 and 3)

All 102 individuals were examined again in Study 2 at a mean age of 21 years (6 years after anorexia nervosa onset), Reference Gillberg, Rastam and Gillberg14,Reference Gillberg, Gillberg, Rastam and Johansson15 and in Study 3 at a mean age of 24 years (10 years after onset). Reference Wentz, Gillberg, Gillberg and Rastam7

Study 4

All 51 cases of anorexia nervosa were followed up in Study 4. Forty-five individuals agreed to a personal interview and five were interviewed over the telephone. In one case the mother did not want us to see her daughter, who had persisting anorexia nervosa, but agreed to a collateral interview with the semi-structured instruments used with the other participants. The 51 individuals in the comparison group all participated in Study 4. All but three were interviewed in person; these three were interviewed over the telephone. The study was approved by the human ethics committee at the medical faculty of Göteborg University. The individuals participated voluntarily after informed consent was obtained.

Measures

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders (SCID–I) and the Morgan–Russell scales were used, Reference First, Gibbon and Williams16,Reference Morgan and Russell17 by either E.W. or M.R. Assessment of overall outcome was based on the three measures of the Morgan–Russell scales with the later modification by the Russell group. Reference Ratnasuriya, Eisler, Szmukler and Russell3

  1. (a) General outcome: categorised as good, intermediate or poor. A good outcome is a normal body weight – a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 kg/m2 or over – and normal menstruation; an intermediate outcome is normal or near-normal body weight or normal menstruation; and poor outcome is underweight and absent or scanty menstruation.

  2. (b) Persistence of disorder: individuals with overeating or vomiting (weekly or more) were assigned to the poor outcome group even if they had normal weight and menstrual cycles. Reference Ratnasuriya, Eisler, Szmukler and Russell3

  3. (c) Morgan–Russell averaged scale score: this composite score summarises outcome data on body weight, diet restriction, menstruation, attitude to sex and menstruation, social relationships, relationship with family and mental state.

The Morgan–Russell instrument is currently the best-validated instrument in anorexia nervosa outcome research. Reference Steinhausen1

Global Assessment of Functioning

Each participant's current social and occupational functioning was rated on the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale by E.W. or M.R. according to the DSM–IV. 13 A GAF score of 60 or below was considered to represent poor psychosocial functioning.

Full symptomatic recovery

As proposed by Strober et al, Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5 full recovery refers to patients who have been free of all criterion symptoms of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa for not less than 8 consecutive weeks. In this study the criterion was freedom from the symptoms for more than 6 months. The study by Strober et al had good interrater reliability. Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5

Psychiatric treatment

Psychotherapy was defined in our earlier studies as child or adult psychiatric treatment given on eight occasions or more on an out-patient basis or in-patient treatment. The treatment received was either family or individual psychotherapy based on psychodynamic interventions. The most common form of treatment used was conjoint family therapy (according to descriptions by the individuals and their mothers and supported by medical and psychiatric records). Most of those who had received family therapy had also been given the opportunity of individual psychotherapy. In 1985, at the time of the original study, there was no specialised unit for children and adolescents with eating disorders in the city of Göteborg (a specialised unit opened in 1994). Families with a child with anorexia nervosa primarily sought treatment at child psychiatric and paediatric clinics, and in some cases only gynaecologists or general practitioners were consulted.

Statistical analysis

Scale scores were not normally distributed and therefore mainly non-parametric tests were used. For comparison between the two groups, the Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for dichotomous variables. Changes over time were analysed using Wilcoxon signed rank test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomous variables. The prognostic factors used in the univariate and multivariate analyses were data obtained from before anorexia nervosa onset or before Study 2. In the univariate analysis, for comparison between the two groups, Fisher's non-parametric permutation test was used. Formal testing of correlations was performed using Pitman's non-parametric permutation test and for descriptive purposes Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated. All dependent variables were transformed to normal distribution using Blom's normal score transformation prior to multivariate analysis, which was performed with multiple stepwise linear regression analysis. Only variables with P<0.15 in univariate tests were included as possible predictors in the multiple stepwise procedure, owing to multiple testing at each step and to possible complex interrelationships among the variables. For survival analysis, the log-rank test was used for dichotomous variables and Cox's proportional hazard model for continuous and ordered categorical variables. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. In order to select independent predictors, stepwise Cox's proportional hazard regression was performed. Only variables with P<0.15 were included as possible predictors in the multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for descriptive purposes. All tests were two-tailed and conducted at a 5% significance level.

Predictor variables

The univariate and stepwise analyses of GAF and Morgan–Russell scores as dependent outcome variables were first conducted with variables measured at anorexia nervosa onset including retrospective childhood data (early gastrointestinal problems, problems with friends before the disorder onset, major problems in family before onset, major life events before onset, parental divorce before onset, death of parent or sibling before onset, premorbid affective disorder, premorbid overweight, premorbid social class, premorbid obsessive–compulsive disorder, premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder, prenatal, perinatal and neonatal factors, premorbid BMI and age at disorder onset) and then with variables measured in Study 2 or before (i.e. variables measured at anorexia nervosa onset including premorbid factors): dysdiadochokinesia in Study 1 and/or Study 2, autism-spectrum condition before anorexia nervosa onset and/or in Study 2, restrictive subtype in Study 1 and Study 2, anxiety disorder in Study 1 and/or Study 2, obsessive–compulsive disorder in Study 1 and/or Study 2, full-scale IQ in Study 2 and minimum BMI in Study 2.

Results

The mean ages of the sample and the interval between anorexia nervosa onset and time of assessment in Study 4 are given in Table 1.

Table 1 Distributions of ages at onset of anorexia nervosa and at the four studies, plus time elapsed between onset of the disorder and follow-up studies

Anorexia nervosa group (n=51) Comparison group (n=51)
Mean Median Range Mean Median Range
Age, years
   Onset 14.3 14.3 10.0–17.2
   Study 1 16.1 16.2 11.1–19.1 16.0 16.3 11.3–18.8
   Study 2 21.0 21.3 15.1–23.1 20.8 21.1 14.9–22.8
   Study 3 24.5 25.0 18.2–26.8 24.2 24.6 18.0–26.4
   Study 4 32.4 32.9 26.0–34.5 32.4 33.0 26.2–34.9
Time elapsed, years
   Onset to Study 2 6.7 6.7 3.8–10.8
   Onset to Study 3 10.2 10.3 7.0–13.9
   Onset to Study 4 18.1 18.3 14.6–21.5

Study 1, original study; Study 2, 6-year follow-up study; Study 3, 10-year follow-up study; Study 4, 18-year follow-up study

Eating and other psychiatric disorders

In Study 4, six women (12%) still met the criteria for an eating disorder (Fig. 1). Altogether three women (6%) had anorexia nervosa, all with a restrictive subtype. Anorexia nervosa from onset until Study 4 was present in only one woman. One woman had been free from anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders for several years, but had had a relapse of anorexia nervosa 6 months before Study 4. Another woman had had a diagnosis of EDNOS for several years, but in Study 4 she fulfilled the criteria for anorexia nervosa. Three women had EDNOS with bulimic behaviour. Body mass index values did not differ between the anorexia nervosa and comparison groups (anorexia nervosa group, mean=22.4 kg/m2, s.d.=4.5, range 13.6–37.7; comparison group, mean=23.4 kg/m2, s.d.=4.2, range 18.0–38.1).

Full symptomatic recovery

Overall, 27 (54%) individuals in the anorexia nervosa group compared with 45 (88%) individuals in the comparison group had been free from disturbed behaviour and attitudes with respect to food and shape in the past 6 months (P<0.001). Eleven women (22%) in the anorexia nervosa group were ‘meat avoiders’ (i.e. they were either vegetarians (n=6) or just avoided meat (n=5)) v. one woman in the comparison group (2%) (P<0.0001). Full recovery occurred in 18% of the meat avoiders and in 63% of the ‘non-meat avoiders’ (P=0.015). Thirty-nine per cent of the anorexia nervosa group (n=20) met the criteria for at least one psychiatric disorder at follow-up (comparison group, 16%; n=8) (P=0.004) (Table 2). The single most common psychiatric disorder was obsessive–compulsive disorder, affecting 16% (n=8) in the anorexia nervosa group and none in the comparison group (P=0.006). Twenty-two per cent of the anorexia nervosa group (n=11) had an affective disorder (comparison group, 4%; n=2) (P=0.015), with a concurrent eating disorder in only two cases.

Table 2 Current and lifetime Axis I disorders in the anorexia nervosa and comparison groups

Current diagnoses Lifetime diagnoses
Anorexia nervosa group Comparison group Anorexia nervosa group Comparison group
No eating disorder (n=45) Eating disorder (n=6) Total (n=51) Total (n=51) Total (n=51) Total (n=51)
Affective disorders
   Major depression
      Unipolar 4 2 6 0 34 12
      Bipolar I 2 0 2 1 3 1
      Bipolar II 2 0 2 1 2 1
   Dysthymic disorder 1 0 1 0 11 2
   Any affective disorder 9 2 11 * 2 50 *** 16
   Anxiety disorders
   Panic disorder 1 1 2 1 8 4
   Agoraphobia 0 1 1 0 1 0
   Social phobia 0 1 1 0 3 1
   Specific phobia 1 1 2 3 9 10
   Obsessive–compulsive disorder 5 3 8 ** 0 21 *** 5
   Post-traumatic stress disorder 1 0 1 1 1 1
   General anxiety disorder 3 2 5 1 15 8
   Any anxiety disorder 10 4 14 6 37 ** 20
Any anxiety disorder a 5 4 9 6 26 18
Psychotic disorders
   Paranoid schizophrenia 1 0 1 1 1 1
   Schizophreniform disorder 1 0 1 0 1 0
   Psychosis NOS 0 0 0 0 1 0
   Any psychotic disorder 2 0 2 1 3 1
Impulse control disorders
   Substance misuse 0 0 0 0 2 3
Any Axis I disorder b 16 4 20 ** 8 51 *** 29

NOS, not otherwise specified

a. Excluding obsessive–compulsive disorder

b. Excluding eating disorders

* P<0.05

** P<0.01

*** P<0.0001; all anorexia nervosa group v. comparison group

Life course of eating and other psychiatric disorders

Figure 1 illustrates lifetime eating disorder diagnoses in the anorexia nervosa group. Only 12 individuals (24%) in the anorexia nervosa group had never exhibited bulimic behaviour. The average duration of anorexia nervosa was 3.4 years (s.d.=2.4, range 0.9–14.7). The total duration of eating disorders (including the anorexia nervosa period) in the anorexia nervosa group was, on average, 7.5 years (s.d.=4.7, range 0.9–19.0). In the anorexia nervosa group all but one had at some time met the criteria for an affective disorder (Table 2). Anxiety disorders had been significantly more common over the years in this group, affecting 73% (n=37) at some time compared with 39% (n=20) in the comparison group (P=0.001). Among the anxiety disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorder was by far the most common diagnosis over the years, and lifetime prevalence differed significantly from the comparison group (anorexia nervosa group, n=21; comparison group, n=5; P<0.0001) (Table 2).

Morgan–Russell scales

According to the general outcome classification (only applied to the anorexia nervosa group), 6% (n=3) had a poor outcome, 10% (n=5) had an intermediate outcome and 84% (n=43) had good outcome. In terms of persistence of eating disorder, 12% (n=6) had a poor outcome, including all cases with a current eating disorder, 10% (n=5) had intermediate outcome and 78% (n=40) had a good outcome. The Morgan–Russell averaged scale scores were 9.7 (s.d.=2.1, range 3.6–12.0) and 11.0 (s.d.=1.2, range 5.6–12.0) for the anorexia nervosa and comparison groups respectively (P<0.0001). Comparing the averaged Morgan–Russell scale scores with scores in our earlier studies, the anorexia nervosa group had scored significantly worse in Study 2 (8.7, s.d.=2.4, range 2.6–12.0; P<0.0001) but there was no significant improvement compared with Study 3 (9.4, s.d.=2.2, range 4.1–12.0; P=0.058).

Thirteen (25%) individuals in the anorexia nervosa group had no paid employment owing to their eating disorder and/or other psychiatric problems compared with one individual (2%) in the comparison group (P=0.001). All individuals with a persisting eating disorder had sickness pension or were on extended sick leave. The mean GAF score was significantly lower in the anorexia nervosa group: 65.2 (median=70, s.d.=18.0, range 30–90) compared with 82.4 (median=88; s.d.=12.8, range 30–95) in the comparison group (P<0.0001). Forty-one per cent in the anorexia nervosa group had poor psychosocial functioning with GAF scores of 60 or below. All the individuals with a persisting eating disorder belonged to this poor outcome group. Other individuals with low GAF scores had one or more Axis I disorders and/or severe problems with regard to social contacts.

Thirty-one individuals (61%) had received psychotherapy, defined as child or adult psychiatric treatment based on psychodynamic interventions given on eight occasions or more. Ten individuals (20%) had either consulted psychiatric services on fewer than eight occasions or had been treated by a non-specialist. Ten individuals (20%) had never consulted anyone for their eating disorder or for any other psychiatric disorder. There was no significant difference regarding GAF and Morgan–Russell scale scores in Study 4 among those who had received treatment at all and those who had not. The 31 individuals who had received psychotherapy had a longer duration of anorexia nervosa (4.40 years (s.d.=3.0) v. 2.31 years (s.d.=1.2); P=0.002), lower GAF score (60.0 (s.d.=18.7) v. 73.2 (s.d.=13.7); P=0.014), lower age at anorexia nervosa onset (13.8 years (s.d.=1.6) v. 14.9 years (s.d.=1.2); P=0.027) and lower minimum BMI ever (14.4 kg/m2 (s.d.=2.7) v. 16.0 kg/m2 (s.d.=2.0); P=0.032) compared with the rest of the anorexia nervosa group.

Predictive factors

Significant predictors and tendencies in the univariate analysis of GAF score as dependent outcome variable were early gastrointestinal problems (P=0.066), age at anorexia nervosa onset (P=0.070), autism-spectrum condition before anorexia nervosa onset and/or in Study 2 (P=0.007) and minimum BMI ever in Study 2 (P=0.043). Significant predictors and tendencies in the univariate analysis of Morgan–Russell score as dependent outcome variable were problems with friends before anorexia nervosa onset (P=0.096), premorbid obsessive–compulsive disorder (P=0.079), premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (P=0.019), age at anorexia nervosa onset (P=0.092), dysdiadochokinesia in Study 1 and/or Study 2 (P=0.033) and autism-spectrum condition before anorexia nervosa onset and/or in Study 2 (P=0.031).

Stepwise analysis

Independent predictors, measured in Study 2 or before, of poor outcome according to GAF in Study 4 were autism-spectrum condition before anorexia nervosa onset and/or in Study 2 (P=0.0023) and age at anorexia nervosa onset (the lower the age, the lower the GAF score) (P=0.021) (model r 2=0.29). Independent predictor of poor outcome according to Morgan–Russell scores in Study 4 among variables measured before anorexia nervosa onset was premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (P=0.016) (model r 2=0.11) and independent predictors among variables measured in Study 2 or before were premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (P=0.016), autism-spectrum condition before anorexia nervosa onset and/or in Study 2 (P=0.034) and age at onset (the lower the age, the lower the Morgan–Russell score) (P=0.047) (model r 2=0.26).

Survival analysis

Table 3 shows the results for the survival analysis, using the duration of the first anorexia nervosa episode as the dependent outcome variable. The multivariate analysis rendered two significant independent predictors, namely age at anorexia nervosa onset (the lower the age, the longer the duration of the first anorexia nervosa episode) (P<0.0009; HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.19–1.94) and premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder (P<0.0091; HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.21–0.80).

Table 3 Univariate survival analysis regarding duration of first episode of anorexia nervosa

Predictor HR (95% CI) P a
Prenatal, perinatal and neonatal factors b 1.05 (0.88-1.26) 0.58
Early gastrointestinal problems 0.99 (0.56-1.73) 0.97
Problems with friends before onset 0.76 (0.43-1.34) 0.35
Major problems in family before onset 1.33 (0.70-2.53) 0.38
Major life events before onset 1.17 (0.66-2.08) 0.58
Parental divorce before onset 1.14 (0.63-2.07) 0.67
Death of parent or sibling before onset 1.14 (0.53-2.45) 0.74
Premorbid affective disorder 1.14 (0.41-3.21) 0.80
Premorbid BMI 1.13 (1.04-1.23) 0.003
Premorbid overweight 1.41 (0.70-2.85) 0.34
Premorbid social class 1 1.25 (0.30-5.19) 0.76
Premorbid social class 2 0.76 (0.42-1.37) 0.36
Premorbid social class 3 1.27 (0.71-2.26) 0.42
Premorbid OCD 0.66 (0.33-1.31) 0.23
Premorbid OCPD 0.61 (0.33-1.11) 0.11
Age at onset 1.35 (1.08-1.69) 0.008
Primary amenorrhoea c 1.82 (0.77-4.34) 0.17

BMI, body mass index; HR, hazard ratio; OCD, obsessive–compulsive disorder; OCPD, obsessive–compulsive personality disorder

a. Cox regression model

b. Based on data from 47 individuals

c. Based on data from the 48 female participants

Discussion

Long-term follow-up studies are extremely important in anorexia nervosa, considering the lengthy duration of the illness in many cases. In this study the mean duration was over 3 years. Furthermore, the anorexia nervosa group fulfilled the diagnoses of bulimia nervosa or EDNOS for another 4 years on average. In addition, in an adolescent sample a longer follow-up time is needed to evaluate the impact of the eating disorder on adult life, with challenges such as getting a job, finding a partner and having children.

The strengths of our study include its prospective longitudinal approach. It is the first long-term follow-up study of anorexia nervosa with a community-based sample. Reference Berkman, Lohr and Bulik9 The sample included only individuals with teenage onset of anorexia nervosa. A matched comparison group with no eating disorder was assessed at the same time and with the same instruments in the original study and at follow-up. There was no attrition.

No death has occurred in either sample during the 18 years that we have followed the 51 participants with anorexia nervosa and the 51 individuals in the matched comparison group. This is a better result than in other long-term follow-up studies, which have reported a mortality rate of almost 20%. Reference Theander2Reference Zipfel, Lowe, Reas, Deter and Herzog4 In his review of follow-up studies, Steinhausen concluded that mortality rates increased significantly with the length of the follow-up. Reference Steinhausen1 Another Swedish study, based on registers, reported a low mortality rate: 1.2% at 9–14-year follow-up of adolescent in-patients with anorexia nervosa. Reference Hjern, Lindberg and Lindblad18 It would seem that recent Swedish outcome studies have a much better prognosis in comparison with other countries' results. Reference Nilsson and Hägglöf8,Reference Hjern, Lindberg and Lindblad18 However, these Swedish studies are in agreement with other follow-up studies with teenage-onset anorexia nervosa, in which low or zero mortality rates have been reported. Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5,Reference Herpertz-Dahlmann, Muller, Herpertz, Heussen, Hebebrand and Remschmidt6 The results may be due to better treatment strategies in recent years and may apply to older patients as well.

At the 18-year follow-up only six individuals had persisting eating disorder; three of whom still had anorexia nervosa. This finding is one indication of a favourable long-term outcome and is consistent with recent research focusing on teenage anorexia nervosa. Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5,Reference Herpertz-Dahlmann, Muller, Herpertz, Heussen, Hebebrand and Remschmidt6,Reference Nilsson and Hägglöf8,Reference Steinhausen, Seidel and Winkler Metzke19 On the other hand, as in Strober et al's teenage sample, Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5 symptoms pertaining to over-awareness of body shape, weight and tension at mealtimes tended to persevere. These are problems that, in turn, have implications for social life, and may contribute to the poor psychosocial outcome in anorexia nervosa.

In our study, 39% had a psychiatric disorder other than an eating disorder. One in five had an affective disorder. This is in line with earlier outcome studies. Reference Steinhausen1,Reference Herpertz-Dahlmann, Muller, Herpertz, Heussen, Hebebrand and Remschmidt6,Reference Fichter, Quadflieg and Hedlund20 In our study the rate of psychiatric comorbidity had not changed since our previous follow-up, 10 years after the onset of anorexia nervosa. Reference Wentz, Gillberg, Gillberg and Rastam7 However, in that study we concluded that affective disorders seemed to subside when the individuals had recovered from their eating disorder. In this latest assessment, 11 individuals in the anorexia nervosa group had an affective disorder and only 2 of them had a persisting eating disorder. Thus, we found substantial problems with affective disorders even after the individuals had recovered from their eating disorder.

Our teenage-onset, community-based anorexia nervosa group had a better outcome of eating disorder per se compared with clinical samples. Nevertheless, we did not find the expected better outcome with respect to employment and psychiatric symptoms. Reference Ratnasuriya, Eisler, Szmukler and Russell3,Reference Steinhausen, Seidel and Winkler Metzke19,Reference Lowe, Zipfel, Buchholz, Dupont, Reas and Herzog21 In young adults in the anorexia nervosa group, one in four had no paid employment as a consequence of psychiatric problems that included eating disorders. All individuals with a persisting eating disorder were unemployed. It has not previously been observed that so many individuals with teenage-onset anorexia nervosa remain unemployed owing to persisting psychiatric morbidity almost two decades after illness onset.

Sixty-one per cent of the anorexia nervosa group had received psychotherapy. These individuals had longer duration of anorexia nervosa, lower GAF scores in Study 4, lower age at onset and lower minimum BMI ever. As this is not a treatment study it is difficult to draw any conclusions from these data. Individuals with a more severe form of eating disorder and co-existing psychiatric disorders would seem to be more likely to seek psychotherapeutic treatment at some point. At the time of the original study the reason for not seeking help was lack of opportunity. However, the research team referred those without psychiatric contacts. Nevertheless, many individuals and their families did not attend psychiatric services. Those who came to medical attention were generally not worse off than the rest. Reference Gillberg, Rastam and Gillberg22 In the present community-based study, 20% had never consulted anyone for their eating disorder or any other psychiatric disorder. Thus, in non-community-based treatment studies of anorexia nervosa, one should consider that one in five may never seek treatment.

Predictive factors

In this study we had access to a vast amount of data for this cohort from birth onwards. In Study 1, our group collected information meticulously on environmental background factors. Reference Rastam and Gillberg23 Familial and other environmental factors before anorexia nervosa onset did not turn out to be predictors of importance with respect to outcome. Low age at anorexia nervosa onset in our study predicted unfavourable outcome according to all our outcome variables, consistent with a study focusing on a sample with younger individuals. Reference Bryant-Waugh, Knibbs, Fosson, Kaminski and Lask24 Premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder predicted poor outcome with respect to the duration of the first anorexia nervosa episode and Morgan–Russell scores. The diagnosis of premorbid obsessive–compulsive personality disorder had been assigned by a masked rater in Study 1 based on retrospective information from a collateral interview with the mother. According to two reviews there is reasonable evidence that this disorder is associated with a poor outcome. Reference Steinhausen1,Reference Crane, Roberts and Treasure25 Autistic traits occurring premorbidly and/or in late adolescence or early adult life have not previously been reported as an unfavourable prognostic factor. Autism-spectrum conditions in childhood reported in Study 1 and/or in Study 2 predicted a poor outcome according to the global functioning scales used in this study. In Study 1 and Study 2, an autism-spectrum condition was assigned by a masked rater. We believe that other researchers who have described poor social skills and obsessionality before the onset of anorexia nervosa have probably come across individuals with a disorder belonging to the autism spectrum. Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5

Limitations

We have assessed our sample on only four separate occasions. The retrospective data, concerning among other things relapses between studies, may be less reliable. Our sample size is relatively small in comparison with other follow-up studies. Reference Theander2,Reference Strober, Freeman and Morrell5,Reference Sullivan, Bulik, Fear and Pickering26 The design of the original study, recruiting a homogeneous sample from the community and not from clinics, limited the number of available participants.

Clinical implications

To summarise, 18 years after the onset of anorexia nervosa in adolescence, the outcome regarding mortality and eating disorders was good. In terms of psychiatric and psychosocial outcomes the results were more discouraging, with 39% experiencing other psychiatric disorders and one in four unable to work. Low age at anorexia nervosa onset, obsessive–compulsive personality disorder and autistic traits predicted an unfavourable outcome.

Acknowledgements

Birgitta Melander was instrumental in assuring coverage of the original cohort of probands and controls. Independent statistical analysis was performed by Nils-Gunnar Pehrsson and Mikael Holtenman. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council (K2006-21X-20048-01-2), government grants under the Avtal om Läkarutbildning och Forskning (ALF) Agreement on Medical Education and Research, Knut and Alice Wallenberg's Foundation, the Söderström Königska Nursing Home Foundation, the Swedish Medical Society and the Göteborg Freemasons.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

None.

Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.

References

1 Steinhausen, HC. The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1284–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Theander, S. Outcome and prognosis in anorexia nervosa and bulimia: some results of previous investigations, compared with those of a Swedish long-term study. J Psychiatr Res 1985; 19: 493508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Ratnasuriya, RH, Eisler, I, Szmukler, GI, Russell, GF. Anorexia nervosa: outcome and prognostic factors after 20 years. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 158: 495502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Zipfel, S, Lowe, B, Reas, DL, Deter, HC, Herzog, W. Long-term prognosis in anorexia nervosa: lessons from a 21-year follow-up study. Lancet 2000; 355: 721–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Strober, M, Freeman, R, Morrell, W. The long-term course of severe anorexia nervosa in adolescents: survival analysis of recovery, relapse, and outcome predictors over 10–15 years in a prospective study. Int J Eat Disord 1997; 22: 339–60.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Herpertz-Dahlmann, B, Muller, B, Herpertz, S, Heussen, N, Hebebrand, J, Remschmidt, H. Prospective 10-year follow-up in adolescent anorexia nervosa – course, outcome, psychiatric comorbidity, and psychosocial adaptation. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42: 603–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Wentz, E, Gillberg, C, Gillberg, IC, Rastam, M. Ten-year follow-up of adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa: psychiatric disorders and overall functioning scales. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001; 42: 613–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Nilsson, K, Hägglöf, B. Long-term follow-up of adolescent onset anorexia nervosa in Northern Sweden. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2005; 13: 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Berkman, ND, Lohr, KN, Bulik, CM. Outcomes of eating disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40: 293309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Rastam, M, Gillberg, C, Garton, M. Anorexia nervosa in a Swedish urban region. A population-based study. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 155: 642–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Rastam, M. Anorexia nervosa in 51 Swedish adolescents: premorbid problems and comorbidity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992; 31: 819–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd edn, revised) (DSM–III–R). American Psychiatric Press, 1987.Google Scholar
13 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). American Psychiatric Press, 1994.Google Scholar
14 Gillberg, IC, Rastam, M, Gillberg, C. Anorexia nervosa 6 years after onset: part I. Personality disorders. Compr Psychiatry 1995; 36: 61–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Gillberg, IC, Gillberg, C, Rastam, M, Johansson, M. The cognitive profile of anorexia nervosa: a comparative study including a community-based sample. Compr Psychiatry 1996; 37: 2330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 First, MB SR, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders – Patient Edition (SCID–I/P, Version 2.0, 4/97 revision). New York Biometrics Research Department, 1997.Google Scholar
17 Morgan, HG, Russell, GF. Value of family background and clinical features as predictors of long-term outcome in anorexia nervosa: four-year follow-up study of 41 patients. Psychol Med 1975; 5: 355–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Hjern, A, Lindberg, L, Lindblad, F. Outcome and prognostic factors for adolescent female in-patients with anorexia nervosa: 9- to 14-year follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 2006; 189: 428–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Steinhausen, HC, Seidel, R, Winkler Metzke, C. Evaluation of treatment and intermediate and long-term outcome of adolescent eating disorders. Psychol Med 2000; 30: 1089–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Fichter, MM, Quadflieg, N, Hedlund, S. Twelve-year course and outcome predictors of anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39: 87100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Lowe, B, Zipfel, S, Buchholz, C, Dupont, Y, Reas, DL, Herzog, W. Long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa in a prospective 21-year follow-up study. Psychol Med 2001; 31: 881–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Gillberg, C, Rastam, M, Gillberg, IC. Anorexia nervosa: who sees the patients and who do the patients see? Acta Paediatr 1994; 83: 967–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Rastam, M, Gillberg, C. Background factors in anorexia nervosa. A controlled study of 51 teenage cases including a population sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992; 1: 5364.Google Scholar
24 Bryant-Waugh, R, Knibbs, J, Fosson, A, Kaminski, Z, Lask, B. Long term follow up of patients with early onset anorexia nervosa. Arch Dis Child 1988; 63: 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Crane, AM, Roberts, ME, Treasure, J. Are obsessive–compulsive personality traits associated with a poor outcome in anorexia nervosa? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and naturalistic outcome studies. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40: 581–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Sullivan, PF, Bulik, CM, Fear, JL, Pickering, A. Outcome of anorexia nervosa: a case–control study. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 939–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Eating disorders in the four studies of this cohort. In Study 4, only individuals with a persisting eating disorder are presented. AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; EDNOS, eating disorder not otherwise specified; NO ED, no eating disorder.

Figure 1

Table 1 Distributions of ages at onset of anorexia nervosa and at the four studies, plus time elapsed between onset of the disorder and follow-up studies

Figure 2

Table 2 Current and lifetime Axis I disorders in the anorexia nervosa and comparison groups

Figure 3

Table 3 Univariate survival analysis regarding duration of first episode of anorexia nervosa

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
178
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa: 18-year outcome
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa: 18-year outcome
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Adolescent-onset anorexia nervosa: 18-year outcome
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *