Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5cfd469876-qxg62 Total loading time: 0.327 Render date: 2021-06-24T14:43:24.008Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Antidepressants and rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder: dogma, definitions and deconstructing discrepant data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Michael E. Thase
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Treatment and Research Program, 3535 Market St, Suite 670, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA Email: thase@mail.med.upenn.edu
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

It is suggested that a finding that apparently challenges current practice guidelines, namely that patients with a rapid-cycling pattern of bipolar disorder can take antidepressant monotherapy for months without increasing risk of cycling, may be parsimoniously understood by the way that the investigators defined rapid cycling and by their use of acute-phase fluoxetine monotherapy prior to randomisation to continutaion-phase therapy with fluoxetine, lithium or placebo.

Type
Editorials
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2013 

Current practice

There are relatively few absolute truths in psychiatric therapeutics. Nevertheless, one of the most widely endorsed recommendations in practice guidelines is that patients with a rapid-cycling course of bipolar affective disorder should not receive antidepressants, particularly as a monotherapy, that is, without concomitant therapy with a mood stabiliser. 1-Reference Yatham, Kennedy, Schaffer, Parikh, Beaulieu and O'Donovan4 The findings of Amsterdam and colleagues Reference Amsterdam, Luo and Shults5 in this issue of the Journal are thus of great interest because they appear to challenge the current dogma.

Amsterdam and colleagues' findings

Amsterdam et al Reference Amsterdam, Luo and Shults5 report that not only did patients with a history of rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder show no increased risk of treatment-emergent affective switches across 50 weeks of fluoxetine monotherapy, but they actually had a nominally better outcome than the patients who were randomly assigned to be switched from fluoxetine to lithium. Do these provocative findings indicate that our current practice guidelines need to be rethought or does a careful reading of this study reveal alternative explanations for such discrepant data?

Perhaps the most important methodological detail of this study concerns the way that Amsterdam and colleagues classified ‘rapid cycling’. Reference Amsterdam, Luo and Shults5 Specifically, unlike the DSM-IV-TR criteria 6 for a rapid-cycling pattern, which specify that the individual must have experienced four or more distinct episodes during the past year, the patients in the current study were classified as ‘rapid cycling’ if they had an average of four or more affective episodes per year during the course of their illness. There is no doubt that this definition identified patients with a large number of lifetime episodes: their ‘rapid-cycling’ group had experienced more than three times the number of lifetime depressive episodes (22.8 v. 6.6) and five times more lifetime hypomanic episodes (45.0 v. 9.0) than the ‘non-rapid-cycling’ group. But, this definition did not ensure that the ‘rapid-cycling’ group actually met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for the past year, nor did it ensure that the ‘non-rapid-cycling’ group actually did not meet the DSM-IV-TR criteria. We do not know how many of the participants in Amsterdam et al's study would have met the DSM-IV-TR criteria for a rapid-cycling pattern. But we do know that the average length of the index depressive episode of their rapid-cycling group was reported to be of 13.3 months' duration, which essentially precludes the possibility that many of the patients in this group were actually in a rapid-cycling pattern of illness at the time they entered this study. Moreover, as the average index depressive episode of the non-rapid-cycling group was reported as only 4.0 months, their rapid-cycling-group was paradoxically more chronically and persistently depressed than the non-rapid-cycling group at study entry.

A second important methodological detail pertains to the design of the larger study from which these data were drawn Reference Amsterdam and Shults7 : all of the patients included in this report had all been first treated with up to 80 mg/day of fluoxetine for 12 weeks before entering the 50-week, randomised, placebo-controlled discontinuation/substitution phase of this study. Moreover, only those patients who stably remitted on fluoxetine therapy, as defined by a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score of eight or less at week 12, entered the next phase of the study. As such, the longer-term study examined a patient group that was ‘enriched’ not only for response to fluoxetine, but also for the absence of treatment-emergent affective shifts during fluoxetine monotherapy.

The most parsimonious explanation of the results of Amsterdam et al Reference Amsterdam, Luo and Shults5 is that there is a subset of patients who meet criteria for bipolar II depression who not only can remit on fluoxetine monotherapy but can also continue on this therapy for up to 1 year without an increased risk of treatment-emergent affective shifts. Further, their findings suggest that these patients can do well on fluoxetine monotherapy whether or not they have a past history of many past depressive or hypomanic episodes. As such, these results do not inform treatment decisions for patients who have experienced four or more episodes during the year before their decision to seek treatment.

Despite growing recognition that bipolar II disorder may be more prevalent than bipolar I disorder, there are few controlled studies of bipolar II depression and no definitive, placebo controlled studies of antidepressants (see, for example, Swartz & Thase Reference Swartz and Thase8 ). The current study provides additional information about the utility of antidepressant monotherapy for at least some patients with bipolar II depression. In this respect, the results are fully consistent with a series of earlier reports by this research group, Reference Amsterdam and Brunswick9 including prior studies of fluoxetine Reference Amsterdam, Garcia-España, Fawcett, Quitkin, Reimherr and Rosenbaum10-Reference Amsterdam, Shults, Brunswick and Hundert13 and venlafaxine. Reference Amsterdam and Garcia-España14-Reference Amsterdam, Wang and Shults17 As other investigators have observed venlafaxine to be associated with a high risk of treatment-emergent affective shifts in patients with bipolar depression taking concomitant mood stabilisers, Reference Leverich, Altshuler, Frye, Suppes, McElroy and Keck18,Reference Vieta, Martinez-Arán, Goikolea, Torrent, Colom and Benabarre19 there is further reason to suspect that Amsterdam and colleagues have sampled into a group of patients with bipolar II disorder with a relatively low risk of treatment-emergent affective shifts. Nevertheless, the weight of the series of studies of Amsterdam and colleagues does suggest that there is little reason to systematically avoid the use of antidepressants for patients with bipolar II depression who have no prior history of antidepressant treatment or who have been treated successfully with antidepressants in the past.

Conclusions

With the future in mind, the findings of the current study remind us of the importance of clarifying the past treatment history of individuals presenting with a history of a rapid-cycling pattern, whether defined by the DSM-IV-TR criteria or those used by Amsterdam and colleagues. Specifically, it seems likely that injunctions against using antidepressants are most relevant for those who have experienced treatment-emergent affective shifts while taking antidepressants and may not even apply to those who either have never taken an antidepressant or who have previously taken antidepressants without experiencing treatment-emergent affective shifts. Indeed, in the Systematic Treatment Evaluation Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) project, the prospective risk of treatment-emergent affective shifts was strongly related to a past history of switching on anti-depressants. Reference Truman, Goldberg, Ghaemi, Baldassano, Wisniewski and Dennehy20 Of particular relevance, Truman and colleagues Reference Truman, Goldberg, Ghaemi, Baldassano, Wisniewski and Dennehy20 also found that patients at increased risk for switching had index depressive episodes of relatively short durations and more extensive histories of past antidepressant treatment. With these findings in mind, it would be worthwhile to carefully examine the past treatment history of the patients of Amsterdam et al. Reference Amsterdam, Luo and Shults5 It may be that their findings are neither discrepant nor paradigm shifting, but rather reflect important differences in definitions and the vulnerability of their patient population.

References

1 American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder (revision). Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159 (suppl 4): 150 Google Scholar
2 Fountoulakis, KN, Kasper, S, Andreassen, O, Blier, P, Okasha, A, Severus, E, et al Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 262 (suppl 1): 148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Suppes, T, Dennehy, EB, Hirschfeld, RM, Altshuler, LL, Bowden, CL, Calabrese, JR, et al The Texas implementation of medication algorithms: update to the algorithms for treatment of bipolar I disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66: 870–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Yatham, LN, Kennedy, SH, Schaffer, A, Parikh, SV, Beaulieu, S, O'Donovan, C, et al Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2009. Bipolar Disord 2009; 11: 225–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Amsterdam, JD, Luo, L, Shults, J. Efficacy and mood conversion rate during long-term fluoxetine V. lithium monotherapy in rapid- and non-rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 301–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn, revised) (DSM-IV-TR). APA, 2000.Google Scholar
7 Amsterdam, JD, Shults, J. Efficacy and safety of long-term fluoxetine versus lithium monotherapy of bipolar II disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-substitution study. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 792800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Swartz, HA, Thase, ME. Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of acute bipolar II depression: current evidence. J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72: 356–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Amsterdam, JD, Brunswick, DJ. Antidepressant monotherapy for bipolar type II major depression. Bipolar Disord 2003; 5: 388–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Amsterdam, JD, Garcia-España, F, Fawcett, J, Quitkin, FM, Reimherr, FW, Rosenbaum, JF, et al Efficacy and safety of fluoxetine in treating bipolar II major depressive episode. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1998; 18: 435–40.Google ScholarPubMed
11 Amsterdam, JD, Shults, J. Comparison of fluoxetine, olanzapine, and combined fluoxetine plus olanzapine initial therapy of bipolar type I and type II major depression - lack of manic induction. J Affect Disord 2005; 87: 121–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Amsterdam, JD, Shults, J. Fluoxetine monotherapy of bipolar type II and bipolar NOS major depression: a double-blind, placebo-substitution, continuation study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 20: 257–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Amsterdam, JD, Shults, J, Brunswick, DJ, Hundert, M. Short-term fluoxetine monotherapy for bipolar type II or bipolar NOS major depression - low manic switch rate. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6: 7581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Amsterdam, JD, Garcia-España, F. Venlafaxine monotherapy in women with bipolar II and unipolar major depression. J Affect Disord 2000; 59: 225–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Amsterdam, JD, Shults, J. Comparison of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy for bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized open-label study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 28: 171–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Amsterdam, JD, Wang, CH, Shwarz, M, Shults, J. Venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy of rapid and non-rapid cycling patients with bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized, parallel group, open-label trial. J Affect Disord 2009; 112: 219–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Amsterdam, JD, Wang, G, Shults, J. Venlafaxine monotherapy in bipolar type II depressed patients unresponsive to prior lithium monotherapy. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010; 121: 201–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Leverich, GS, Altshuler, LL, Frye, MA, Suppes, T, McElroy, SL, Keck, PE Jr, et al Risk of switch in mood polarity to hypomania or mania in patients with bipolar depression during acute and continuation trials of venlafaxine, sertraline, and bupropion as adjuncts to mood stabilizers. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 232–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Vieta, E, Martinez-Arán, A, Goikolea, JM, Torrent, C, Colom, F, Benabarre, A, et al A randomized trial comparing paroxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of bipolar depressed patients taking mood stabilizers. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 508–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Truman, CJ, Goldberg, JF, Ghaemi, SN, Baldassano, CF, Wisniewski, SR, Dennehy, EB, et al Self-reported history of manic/hypomanic switch associated with antidepressant use: data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). J Clin Psychiatry 2007; 68: 1472–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Antidepressants and rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder: dogma, definitions and deconstructing discrepant data
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Antidepressants and rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder: dogma, definitions and deconstructing discrepant data
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Antidepressants and rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder: dogma, definitions and deconstructing discrepant data
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *