Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-6f8dk Total loading time: 0.336 Render date: 2021-03-08T08:20:29.563Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrew Mackinnon
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Kathleen M. Griffiths
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Helen Christensen
Affiliation:
Centre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

An earlier paper reported positive outcomes immediately following access to a cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) internet intervention and a depression information website.

Aims

To determine 6-month and 12-month outcomes of the interventions relative to a placebo control condition.

Method

Participants allocated to the depression information website condition, the CBT internet intervention and the placebo control condition were followed up at 6 and 12 months by survey. The primary outcome measure was the Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression (CES–D) scale. Of 525 participants recruited, 79% completed their assigned intervention and 60% were retained at 12-month follow-up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA.

Results

Both the CBT site and depression information sites were associated with statistically significant benefits in CES–D score reduction compared with controls at post-test. At 6-months follow-up, the reduction seen for the people allocated to the CBT arm remained significant, whereas that for the depression information website arm was not. At 12 months, both active interventions were statistically significantly superior to the control condition.

Conclusions

There is some evidence that benefits of these brief internet interventions are retained beyond their endpoint. The impact of human support provided by interviewers in the trial must be considered when comparing these outcomes to routine use of both internet interventions.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008 

References

1 Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM, Jorm, AF. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 328: 265–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Clarke, G, Reid, E, Eubanks, D, O'Connor, E, DeBar, LL, Kelleher, C, Lynch, F, Nunley, S. Overcoming depression on the internet (ODIN): a randomised controlled trial of an internet depression skills intervention program. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4: e14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Emmelkamp, PM. Technological innovations in clinical assessment and psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom 2005; 74: 336–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Spek, V, Cuijpers, P, Nyklícek, I, Riper, H, Keyzer, J, Pop, V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007; 37: 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Christensen, H, Mackinnon, AJ. The law of attrition revisited. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8: e20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Eysenbach, G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7: e11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Houck, PR, Mazumdar, S, Koru-Sengul, T, Tang, G, Mulsant, BH, Pollock, BG, Reynolds, CF 3rd. Estimating treatment effects from longitudinal clinical trial data with missing values: comparative analyses using different methods. Psychiatry Res 2004; 129: 209–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Little, R, Yau, L. Intent-to-treat analysis for longitudinal studies with drop-outs. Biometrics 1996; 52: 1324–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Pickles, A, Everitt, B. Statistical Aspects of the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials. Imperial College Press, 2005.Google Scholar
10 Salim, A, Mackinnon, A, Christensen, H, Griffiths, K. Comparison of data analysis strategies for assessing treatment effectiveness in pretest-posttest designs with substantial dropout rates. Psychiatry Res 2007. In press.Google Scholar
11 Radloff, LS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Gueorguieva, R, Krystal, JH. Move over ANOVA: progress in analyzing repeated-measures data and its reflection in papers published in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61: 310–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
14 Christensen, H, Griffiths, KM, Mackinnon, AJ, Brittliffe, K. Online randomized controlled trial of brief and full cognitive behavior therapy for depression. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 1737–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Christensen, H, Leach, LS, Barney, L, Mackinnon, AJ, Griffiths, KM. The effect of web based depression interventions on self reported help seeking: randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN77824516]. BMC Psychiatry 2006; 6: 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Atherton-Naji, A, Hamilton, R, Riddle, W, Naji, S. Improving adherence to antidepressant drug treatment in primary care: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial of educational intervention. Prim Care Community Psychiatr 2001; 7: 61–7.Google Scholar
17 Jorm, AF, Griffiths, KM, Christensen, H, Korten, AE, Parslow, RA, Rodgers, B. Providing information about the effectiveness of treatment options to depressed people in the community: a randomized controlled trial of effects on mental health literacy, help-seeking and symptoms. Psychol Med 2003; 33: 1071–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Mundt, JC, Clarke, GN, Burroughs, D, Brenneman, DO, Griest, JH. Effectiveness of antidepressant pharmacotherapy: the impact of medication compliance and patient education. Depress Anxiety 2001; 13: 110.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 694 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 02nd January 2018 - 8th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Comparative randomised trial of online cognitive–behavioural therapy and an information website for depression: 12-month outcomes
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *