Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Kelvin K. F. Tsoi (a1), Joyce Y. C. Chan (a2), Hoyee W. Hirai (a3) and Samuel Y. S. Wong (a2)
Abstract
Background

Screening for depression in older adults is recommended.

Aims

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Two-Question Screen for older adults and compare it with other screening instruments for depression.

Method

We undertook a literature search for studies assessing the diagnostic performance of depression screening instruments in older adults. Combined diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity and specificity were the primary outcomes. Potential risks of bias and the quality of studies were also assessed.

Results

A total of 46506 participants from 132 studies were identified evaluating 16 screening instruments. The majority of studies (63/132) used various versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) and 6 used the Two-Question Screen. The combined sensitivity and specificity for the Two-Question Screen were 91.8% (95% CI 85.2–95.6) and 67.7% (95% CI 58.1–76.0), respectively; the diagnostic performance area under the curve (AUC) was 90%. The Two-Question Screen showed comparable performance with other instruments, including clinician-rated scales. The One-Question Screen showed the lowest diagnostic performance with an AUC of 78%. In subgroup analysis, the Two-Question Screen also had good diagnostic performance in screening for major depressive disorder.

Conclusions

The Two-Question Screen is a simple and short instrument for depression screening. Its diagnostic performance is comparable with other instruments and, therefore, it would be favourable to use it for older adult screening programmes.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Samuel Wong, 4/F, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. Email: yeungshanwong@cuhk.edu.hk
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Barua, A, Ghosh, MK, Kar, N, Basilio, MA. Prevalence of depressive disorders in the elderly. Ann Saudi Med 2011; 31: 620–4.
2 Lamers, F, Jonkers, CCM, Bosma, H, Penninx, BW, Knottnerus, JA, van Eijk, JT. Summed score of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was a reliable and valid method for depression screening in chronically ill elderly patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 679–87.
3 Dennis, M, Kadri, A, Coffy, J. Depression in older people in the general hospital: a systematic review of screening instruments. Age Aging 2012; 41: 148–54.
4 Azulai, A, Walsh, CA. Screening for geriatric depression in residential care facilities: a systematic narrative review. J Gerontol Soc Work 2015; 58: 2045.
5 Phelan, E, Williams, B, Meeker, K, Bonn, K, Frederick, J, Logerfo, J, et al. A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly. BMC Fam Pract 2010; 11: 63.
6 Pyne, JM, Patterson, TL, Kaplan, RM, Gillin, JC, Koch, WL. Grant I, et al. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with major depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 224–30.
7 Creed, F, Morgan, R, Fiddler, M, Marshall, S, Guthrie, E, House, A. Depression and anxiety impair health-related quality of life and are associated with increased costs in general medical inpatients. Psychosomatics 2002; 43: 302–9.
8 Pignone, MP, Gaynes, BN, Rushton, JL, Burchell, CM, Orleans, CT, Mulrow, CD, et al. Screening for depression in adults: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 765–76.
9 O'Connor, EA, Whitlock, EP, Gaynes, B, Beil, TL. Screening for Depression in Adults and Older Adults in Primary Care: An Updated Systematic Review. Evidence Synthesis No 75. AHRQ Publication no 10–05143-EF-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009.
10 O'Connor, EA, Whitlock, EP, Beil, TL, Gaynes, BN. Screening for depression in adult patients in primary care settings: a systematic evidence review. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 793803.
11 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for depression in adults: recommendation statement. Am Fam Physician 2010; 82: 976–9.
12 Mojtabai, R. Diagnosing depression in older adults in primary care. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1180–2
13 Watson, LC, Pignone, MP. Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: a systematic review. J Fam Pract 2003; 52: 956–64.
14 Yesavage, JA, Brink, TL, Rose, TL, Lum, O, Huang, V, Adey, M. Development and validation of the geriatric depression scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1983; 17: 3749.
15 Allen, N, Ames, D, Ashby, D, Bennetts, K, Tuckwell, V, West, C. A brief sensitive screening instrument for depression in late life. Age Ageing 1994; 23: 213–9.
16 Alexopoulos, GA, Abrams, RC, Young, RC, Shamoian, CA. Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Biol Psychiatry 1988; 23: 271–84.
17 O'Connor, EA, Rossom, RC, Henninger, M, Groom, HC, Burda, BU, Henderson, JT, et al. Screening for Depression in Adults: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 14-05208-EF-1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2016.
18 Beck, AT, Ward, CH, Mendelson, M, Mock, J, Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–71.
19 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Quick Reference Guide: Depression. NICE, 2004.
20 Whooley, MA, Avins, AL, Miranda, J, Browner, WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12: 439–45.
21 Arroll, B, Khin, N, Kerse, N. Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 327: 1144–6.
22 Mitchell, AJ, Meader, N, Davies, E, Clover, K, Carter, GL, Loscalzo, MJ, et al. Meta-analysis of screening and case finding tools for depression in cancer: evidence based recommendations for clinical practice on behalf of the Depression in Cancer Care consensus group. J Affect Disord 2012; 140: 149–60.
23 Meader, N, Mitchell, AJ, Chew-Graham, C, et al. Case identification of depression in patients with chronic physical health problems: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of 113 studies. Br J Gen Pract 2011; 61: 808–20.
24 Sheikh, JI, Yesavage, JA. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986; 5: 165–73.
25 Radloff, LS. The CES-D scale: a self-administrated depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977; 1: 385401.
26 Bird, A, Macdonald, A, Mann, AH, Philpot, MP. Preliminary experience with the SelfCARE(D): a self-rating depression questionnaire for use in elderly, non-institutionalized subjects. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1987; 2: 31–8.
27 Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG, Group, PRISMA. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264–9.
28 Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PMM, Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 889–97.
29 Macaskill, P, Gatsonis, C, Deeks, JJ, et al. Analysing and presenting results. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0 (eds Deeks, JJ, Bossuyt, PM, Gatsonis, C). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2010.
30 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn, revised) (DSM-IV-TR). American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
31 World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. WHO, 1993.
32 Copeland, JRM, Kelleher, MJ, Kellett, J, Gourlay, AJ, Gurland, BJ, Fleiss, JL, et al. A semi- structured interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly. Psychol Med 1976; 6: 439–49.
33 Copeland, JR, Dewey, ME, Henderson, AS, Kay, DW, Neal, CD, Harrison, MA, et al. The Geriatric Mental State (GMS) used in the community: replication studies of the computerized diagnosis AGECAT. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 219–23.
34 olin, JT, Katz, IR, Meyers, BS, Schneider, LS, Lebowitz, BD. Provisional diagnostic criteria for depression of Alzheimer disease: rationale and background. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 10: 129–41.
35 Whiting, PF, Rutjes, AW, Westwood, ME, Mallett, S, Deeks, JJ, Reitsma, JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529–36.
36 Reitsma, JB, Glas, AS, Rutjes, AW, Scholten, RJ, Bossuyt, PM, Zwinderman, AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 982–90.
37 Glas, AS, Lijmer, JG, Prins, MH, et al. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 1129–35.
38 Rutter, CM, Gatsonis, CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med 2001; 20: 2865–84.
39 Swets, JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285–93.
40 DerSimonian, R, Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88.
41 Rosman, AS, Korsten, MA. Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing. Adv Med Sci 2007; 52: 7682.
42 Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 5662.
43 Montgomery, SA, Åsberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382–9.
44 Robison, J, Gruman, C, Gaztambide, S, Blank, K. Screening for depression in middle-aged and older Puerto Rican Primary care patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: 308–14.
45 Baillon, S, Dennis, M, Lo, N, Lindesay, J. Screening for depression in Parkinson's disease: the performance of two screening questions. Age Ageing 2014; 43: 200–5.
46 Blank, K, Gruman, C, Robison, JT. Case-finding for depression in elderly people: balancing ease of administration with validity in varied treatment settings. J Gerontol 2004; 59A: 378–84.
47 Payne, A, Barry, S, Creedon, B, Stone, C, Sweeney, C, O'Brien, T, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of a Two-Question Screening tool for depression in a specialist palliative care unit. Palliat Med 2007; 21: 193–8.
48 McManus, D, Pipkin, SS, Whooley, MA. Screening for depression for patients with coronary heart disease (data from Heart and Soul Study). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1076–81.
49 Esiwe, C, Baillon, S, Rajkonwar, A, Lindesay, J, Lo, N, Dennis, M. Screening for depression in older adults on an acute medical ward: the validity of NICE guidance in using two questions. Age Ageing 2015; 44: 771–5.
50 Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 2003; 41: 1284–92.
51 Mitchell, AJ, Coyne, JC. Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 144–51.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 189 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 26th May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Comparison of diagnostic performance of Two-Question Screen and 15 depression screening instruments for older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Kelvin K. F. Tsoi (a1), Joyce Y. C. Chan (a2), Hoyee W. Hirai (a3) and Samuel Y. S. Wong (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *