Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials

  • Evan Mayo-Wilson (a1), Paul Montgomery (a2), Sally Hopewell (a3), Geraldine Macdonald (a4), David Moher (a5) and Sean Grant (a2)...
Summary

Social and psychological interventions are often complex. Understanding randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of these complex interventions requires a detailed description of the interventions tested and the methods used to evaluate them. However, RCT reports often omit, or inadequately report, this information. Incomplete and inaccurate reporting hinders the optimal use of research, wastes resources and fails to meet ethical obligations to research participants and consumers. In this paper, we explain how reporting guidelines have improved the quality of reports in medicine, and describe the ongoing development of a new reporting guideline for RCTs: CONSORT-SPI (an extension for social and psychological interventions). We invite readers to participate in the project by visiting our website, in order to help us reach the best-informed consensus on these guidelines (http://tinyurl.com/CONSORT-study).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Sean Grant, Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford Barnett House, 32 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2ER, UK. Email: sean.grant@spi.ox.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Medical Research Council. A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health. MRC, 2008.
2 Bonell, C. The utility of randomized controlled trials of social interventions: an examination of two trials of HIV prevention. Crit Public Health 2002; 12: 321–34.
3 Hawe, P., Shiell, A., Riley, T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ 2004; 328: 1561–3.
4 Henggeler, SW, Schoenwald, SK, Rowland, MD, Cunningham, PB. Serious Emotional Disturbances in Children and Adolescents: Multisystemic Therapy. Guildford Press, 2002.
5 Perry, AE, Weisburd, D., Hewitt, C. Are criminologists describing randomized controlled trials in ways that allow us to assess them? Findings from a sample of crime and justice trials. J Exp Criminol 2010; 6: 245–62.
6 Naleppa, MJ, Cagle, JG. Treatment fidelity in social work intervention research: a review of published studies. Res Soc Work Pract 2010; 20: 674–81.
7 Torgerson, CJ, Torgerson, DJ, Birks, YF, Porthouse, J. A comparison of RCTs in health and education. Br Educ Res J 2005; 31: 761–85.
8 Stinson, JN, McGrath, PJ, Yamada, JT. Clinical trials in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology, applying the CONSORT Statement. J Pediatr Psychol 2003; 28: 159–67.
9 Semaan, S., Kay, L., Strouse, D., Sogolow, E., Mullen, PD, Neumann, MS, et al A profile of U.S.-based trials of behavioral and social interventions for HIV risk reduction. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2002; 30: S3050.
10 Schulz, KF, Altman, DG, Moher, D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010: 340: 698702.
11 Moher, D., Schulz, KF, Simera, I., Altman, DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000217.
12 Bonell, CP, Hargreaves, J., Cousens, S., Ross, D., Hayes, R., Petticrew, M., et al Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65: 582–7.
13 Chalmers, I. Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: the role of rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2003; 589: 2240.
14 Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, DG, Weeks, L., Peters, J., Kober, T., et al Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: MR000030.
15 Grant, S., Mayo-Wilson, E., Melendez-Torres, GJ, Montgomery, P. The reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: a systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65442.
16 Mayo-Wilson, E. Reporting implementation in randomized trials: proposed additions to the consolidated standards of reporting trials statement. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 630.
17 Campbell, MK, Elbourne, DR, Altman, DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 2004; 328: 702–8.
18 Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, DG, Schulz, K., Ravaud, P. Methods and processes of the CONSORT group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: W607.
19 Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, JJ, Altman, DG, Tunis, S., Haynes, B., et al Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008; 337: a2390.
20 Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Revicki, D., Moher, D., Brundage, M. Reporting quality of life in clinical trials: a CONSORT extension. Lancet 2011; 378: 1684–5.
21 Abraham, C. WIDER Recommendations to Improve Reporting of the Content of Behaviour Change Interventions. Abraham C, 2009 (http://interventiondesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/wider-recommendations.pdf).
22 American Educational Research Association. Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educ Res 2006; 35: 3340.
23 Newman, M., Elbourne, D. Improving the usability of educational research: guidelines for the REPOrting of primary empirical research Studies in Education (The REPOSE Guidelines). Eval Res Educ 2004; 18: 201–12.
24 APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol 2008; 63: 839–51.
25 Prescott, RJ, Counsell, CE, Gillespie, WJ, Grant, AM, Russell, IT, Kiauka, S., et al Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3: 1143.
26 Schulz, KF, Chalmers, I., Hayes, RJ, Altman, DG. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 1995; 359: 614–7.
27 Moher, D., Pham, B., Jones, A., Cook, DJ, Jadad, AR, Moher, M., et al Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1999; 352: 609–13.
28 Ladd, BO, McCrady, BS, Manuel, JK, Campbell, W. Improving the quality of reporting alcohol outcome studies: effects of the CONSORT statement. Addict Behav 2010; 35: 660–6.
29 Medical Research Council. Using Natural Experiments to Evaluate Population Health Interventions: Guidance for Producers and Users of Evidence. MRC, 2011.
30 Marshall, M., Lockwood, A., Bradley, C., Adams, C., Joy, C., Fenton, M. Unpublished rating scales: a major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 249–52.
31 Moore, L., Moore, GF. Public health evaluation: which designs work, for whom and under what circumstances? J Epidemiol Community Health 2011; 65: 596–7.
32 Shepperd, S., Lewin, S., Straus, S., Clarke, M., Eccles, MP, Fitzpatrick, R., et al Can we systematically review studies that evaluate complex interventions? PLoS Med. 2009; 6: 31000086.
33 Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., Shepperd, S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 2008; 336: 1472–4.
34 Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Mitchie, S., Nazareth, I., Petticrew, M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: 979–83.
35 Moore, L. Research design for the rigorous evaluation of complex educational interventions: lessons from health services research. Build Res Capacity 2002; 1: 45.
36 Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., O'Neill, J., Waters, E., et al PRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001333.
37 Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., Wager, E., Middleton, P., Altman, DG, et al CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet 2008; 371: 281–3.
38 Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schultz, KF, Montori, V., G⊘tzsche, PC, Devereaux, PJ, et al CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869.
39 von Elm, E., Altman, DG, Egger, M., Pocock, SJ, Gotzsche, PC, Vandenbroucke, JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147: 573–7.
40 Des Jarlais, DC, Lyles, C., Crepaz, N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 361–6.
41 Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349–57.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Mayo-Wilson et al. supplementary material
Supplementary Material

 PDF (49 KB)
49 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Developing a reporting guideline for social and psychological intervention trials

  • Evan Mayo-Wilson (a1), Paul Montgomery (a2), Sally Hopewell (a3), Geraldine Macdonald (a4), David Moher (a5) and Sean Grant (a2)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *