Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery

  • Mike Slade (a1), Victoria Bird (a1), Clair Le Boutillier (a1), Marianne Farkas (a2), Barbara Grey (a3), John Larsen (a4), Mary Leamy (a1), Lindsay Oades (a5) and Julie Williams (a1)...
Abstract
Background

There is an emerging evidence base about best practice in supporting recovery. This is usually framed in relation to general principles, and specific pro-recovery interventions are lacking.

Aims

To develop a theoretically based and empirically defensible new pro-recovery manualised intervention – called the REFOCUS intervention.

Method

Seven systematic and two narrative reviews were undertaken. Identified evidence gaps were addressed in three qualitative studies. The findings were synthesised to produce the REFOCUS intervention, manual and model.

Results

The REFOCUS intervention comprises two components: recovery-promoting relationships and working practices. Approaches to supporting relationships comprise coaching skills training for staff, developing a shared team understanding of recovery, exploring staff values, a Partnership Project with people who use the service and raising patient expectations. Working practices comprise the following: understanding values and treatment preferences; assessing strengths; and supporting goal-striving. The REFOCUS model describes the causal pathway from the REFOCUS intervention to improved recovery.

Conclusions

The REFOCUS intervention is an empirically supported pro-recovery intervention for use in mental health services. It will be evaluated in a multisite cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN02507940).

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Mike Slade, PhD, King's College London, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London SE5 8AF, UK. Email: mike.slade@kcl.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Leamy, M, Clarke, E, Le Boutillier, C, Bird, V, Choudhury, R, Macpherson, R, et al. A national survey of recovery practice in community mental health teams. Br J Psychiatry 2015; in press.
2 Bird, V, Leamy, M, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, Slade, M. REFOCUS: Promoting Recovery in Community Mental Health Services. Rethink, 2011.
3 Craig, P, Dieppe, P, Macintyre, S, Michie, S, Nazareth, I, Petticrew, M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: 979–83.
4 Grant, MJ, Booth, A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009; 26: 91108.
5 Mental Health “Recovery” Study Working Group. Mental Health “Recovery”: Users and Refusers. Wellesley Institute, 2009.
6 Leamy, M, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, Slade, M. A conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry 2011; 199: 445–52.
7 Slade, M, Leamy, M, Bacon, F, Janosik, M, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, et al. International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review. Epidemiology Psychiatr Sci 2012; 21: 353–64.
8 Bird, V, Leamy, M, Tew, J, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, Slade, M. Fit for purpose? Validation of the conceptual framework of personal recovery with current mental health service users. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2014; 48: 644–53.
9 Le Boutillier, C, Leamy, M, Bird, VJ, Davidson, L, Williams, J, Slade, M. What does recovery mean in practice? A qualitative analysis of international recovery-oriented practice guidance. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 1470–6.
10 Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Leamy, M, Williams, J, Bradstreet, S, Slade, M. Evaluating the feasibility of complex interventions in mental health services: standardised measure and reporting guidelines. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 204: 316–21.
11 van der Krieke, L, Bird, V, Leamy, M, Bacon, F, Dunn, R, Pesola, F, et al. The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study. Implement Sci 2015; 10: 73.
12 Le Boutillier, C, Slade, M, Lawrence, V, Bird, V, Chandler, R, Farkas, M, et al. Competing priorities: staff perspectives on supporting recovery. Adm Policy Ment Health 2015; 42: 429–38.
13 Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Leamy, M, Larsen, J, Oades, LG, Williams, J, et al. Assessing the strengths of mental health service users – systematic review. Psychol Assess 2012; 24: 1024–33.
14 Schrank, B, Bird, V, Rudnick, A, Slade, M. Determinants, self-management strategies and interventions for hope in people with mental disorders: systematic search and narrative review. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 554–64.
15 Shanks, V, Williams, J, Leamy, M, Bird, VJ, Le Boutillier, C, Slade, M. Measures of personal recovery: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv 2013; 64: 974–80.
16 Williams, J, Leamy, M, Bird, V, Harding, C, Larsen, J, Le Boutillier, C, et al. Measures of the recovery orientation of mental health services: systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47: 1827–35.
17 Tew, J, Ramon, S, Slade, M, Bird, V, Melton, J, Le Boutillier, C. Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: a review of the evidence. Br J Soc Work 2012; 42: 443–60.
18 Slade, M, Bird, V, Chandler, R, Fox, J, Larsen, J, Tew, J, et al. The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study. BMC Health Serv Res 2010; 10: 323.
19 Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 2011; 26: 1113–27.
20 McEachan, RRC, Conner, M, Taylor, NJ, Lawton, RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2011; 5: 97144.
21 Gelso, CJ, Kelley, FA, Fuertes, JN, Marmarosh, C, Holmes, SE, Costa, C, et al. Measuring the real relationship in psychotherapy: initial validation of the therapist form. J Couns Psychol 2005; 52: 640–9.
22 Bock, T, Priebe, S. Psychosis seminars: an unconventional approach. Psychiatr Serv 2005; 56: 1441–3.
23 Slade, M, Amering, M, Oades, L. Recovery: an international perspective. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2008; 17: 128–37.
24 Barrett, RJ. The Psychiatric Team and the Social Definition of Schizophrenia: An Anthropological Study of Person and Illness. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
25 Wright, BA, Lopez, SJ. Widening the diagnostic focus. A case for including human strengths and environmental resources. In Handbook of Positive Psychology (eds Snyder, CR, Lopez, SJ): 2644. Oxford University Press, 2002.
26 Rapp, C, Goscha, RJ. The Strengths Model: Case Management with People with Psychiatric Disabilities, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, 2006.
27 Gilburt, H, Slade, M, Bird, V, Oduola, S, Craig, TK. Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 167.
28 Alexander, G. Behavioural coaching – the GROW model. In Excellence in Coaching (ed. Passmore, J): 8393. Kogan Page, 2006.
29 Williams, J, Leamy, M, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Norton, S, Pesola, F, et al. Development and evaluation of a measure to identify mental health service support for recovery (INSPIRE). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2015; 50: 777–86.
30 Schrank, B, Riches, S, Coggins, T, Tylee, A, Slade, M. From objectivity to subjectivity: conceptualisation and measurement of well-being in mental health. Neuropsychiatry 2013; 3: 525–34.
31 Schrank, B, Bird, V, Tylee, A, Coggins, T, Rashid, T, Slade, M. Conceptualising and measuring the well-being of people with psychosis: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Soc Sci Med 2013; 92: 921.
32 Neil, S, Kilbride, M, Pitt, L, Nothard, S, Welford, M, Sellwood, W, et al. The questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR): a measurement tool developed in collaboration with service users. Psychosis 2009; 1: 145–55.
33 Williams, J, Leamy, M, Pesola, F, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Slade, M. Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR). Br J Psychiatry, 2015; in press.
34 Staley, K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. INVOLVE, 2009.
35 De Silva, M, Breuer, E, Lee, L, Asher, L, Chowdhary, N, Lund, C, et al. Theory of change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions. Trials 2014; 15: 267.
36 Slade, M, Amering, M, Farkas, M, Hamilton, B, O'Hagan, M, Panther, G, et al. Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry 2014; 13: 1220.
37 Davidson, L, Bellamy, C, Guy, K, Miller, R. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: a review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry 2012; 11: 123–8.
38 Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. Implementing Recovery. A New Framework for Organisational Change. Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health, 2009.
39 Shera, W, Ramon, S. Challenges in the implementation of recovery-oriented mental health policies and services. Int J Ment Health 2013; 42: 1742.
40 Slade, M, Leamy, M, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C. Mental health services and recovery. In Improving Mental Health Care: The Global Challenge (eds Thornicroft, G, Ruggeri, M, Goldberg, D): 4056. John Wiley, 2013.
41 Priebe, S, Burns, T, Craig, TK. The future of academic psychiatry may be social. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 319–20.
42 Slade, M, Bird, V, Le Boutillier, C, Williams, J, McCrone, P, Leamy, M. REFOCUS trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11: 185.
43 Slade, M, Bird, V, Clarke, E, Le Boutillier, C, McCrone, P, Macpherson, R, et al. Supporting recovery in patients wih psychosis using adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): a multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2: 503–14.
44 Commonwealth of Australia. A National Framework for Recovery-oriented Mental Health Services. Policy and Theory. Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council, 2013.
45 Shepherd, G, Boardman, J, Rinaldi, M, Roberts, G. ImROC Briefing Paper 8. Supporting Recovery in Mental Health Services: Quality and Outcomes. Implementing Recovery through Organisational Change, 2014.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Development of the REFOCUS intervention to increase mental health team support for personal recovery

  • Mike Slade (a1), Victoria Bird (a1), Clair Le Boutillier (a1), Marianne Farkas (a2), Barbara Grey (a3), John Larsen (a4), Mary Leamy (a1), Lindsay Oades (a5) and Julie Williams (a1)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *