Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.337 Render date: 2021-10-16T05:45:54.331Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Early identification of individuals at risk for antisocial personality disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jonathan Hill*
Affiliation:
University Child Mental Health Unit, Mulberry House, Alder Hey Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool L12 2AP UK. E-mail: jonathan.hill@liverpool.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Antisocial personality disorder is usually preceded by serious and persistent conduct problems starting in early childhood, and so there is little difficulty in identifying an at-risk group.

Aims

To address six key areas concerning the relationship between early conduct problems and antisocial personality disorder.

Method

Review of recent research into early identification of and intervention in child conduct problems, following up to possible adult antisocial behaviour.

Results

Conduct problems are predictive of antisocial personality disorder independently of the associated adverse family and social factors. Prediction could be aided through identification of subtypes of conduct problems. There is limited evidence on which children have problems that are likely to persist and which will improve; children who desist from early conduct problems and those with onset in adolescence are also vulnerable as adults.

Conclusions

The predictive power of the childhood precursors of antisocial personality disorder provides ample justification for early intervention. Greater understanding of subgroups within the broad category of antisocial children and adults should assist with devising and targeting interventions.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2003 

The identification of childhood precursors of adult psychiatric disorders offers the possibility of early intervention and hence prevention. In the case of antisocial personality disorder the early indicators are remarkably clear. Starting with Robins' (Reference Robins1966) classic follow-up of children referred to a clinic for conduct problems, numerous studies have shown that persistent and pervasive aggressive and disruptive behaviours seen before the age of 11 years are strongly associated with persistence of antisocial behaviours through adolescence and into adult life. As Robins described, the risk extends far beyond antisocial behaviours to unstable relationships, unreliable parenting and underachievement in education and at work (Reference Moffitt, Caspi and HarringtonMoffitt et al, 2002). This broad constellation of difficulties is reflected in DSM—IV antisocial personality disorder (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Furthermore, children who do not have conduct problems are very unlikely to subsequently develop antisocial personality disorder (which is rare without a history of conduct problems). Conduct disorder is a specific diagnosis within DSM—IV, which requires antisocial acts seen generally in older children and adolescents. In this paper the terms ‘conduct problems’ and ‘the conduct disorders’ are used to denote serious oppositional, aggressive or antisocial behaviours whether or not they meet DSM criteria for conduct disorder.

METHOD

Selective review of findings published over the past 10 years in childhood predictors of antisocial personality disorder, and consideration of issues still to be addressed in relation to early identification of individuals at risk.

RESULTS

Clinical policy

From a clinical and policy perspective, the strength of the continuity from conduct problems to antisocial personality disorder is ample grounds for making strenuous efforts to prevent the appearance of aggressive and disruptive behaviours in young children, and to intervene early once they have been identified. It is not the purpose of this paper to review the evidence for the effectiveness of prevention programmes and of early interventions for conduct problems, but a brief summary highlights the need for further refinements in early identification. A small number of adequately designed randomised controlled trials of preventive programmes to reduce conduct problems have been carried out, some of which have yielded promising results. Equally, whereas there have been some significant improvements, often the effects have been quite small; and some studies have shown no benefits (Reference LeMarquand, Tremblay, Vitaro, Hill and MaughanLeMarquand et al, 2001). There is substantial support for the effectiveness of parent management training programmes in reducing overall levels of conduct problems in children (Reference Kazdin, Hill and MaughanKazdin, 2000), and for the effectiveness of stimulants where conduct problems are associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Reference Swanson, Kraemer and HinshawSwanson et al, 2001). Nevertheless, there has been considerable variability in outcomes. Parent training has been found to be less effective for the higher-risk families characterised by socio-economic disadvantage, marital discord or single parent status, high parental stress and maternal unresolved loss or trauma (Reference Routh, Hill and SteeleRouth et al, 1995; Reference KazdinKazdin, 1997). Children with more severe or chronic problems or with comorbid conditions are less likely to do well (Reference Ruma, Burke and ThompsonRuma et al, 1996). Evidence of the long-term effectiveness of psychosocial treatments for conduct problems, and of stimulants for conduct problems comorbid with ADHD, is lacking.

Early identification

It may be that the problem will be solved simply through better treatment techniques; however, attention to six issues in early identification may also be of value in generating ideas for the development of interventions. First, conduct problems in young children are associated with many other adverse factors such as ineffective parenting practices, discordant and unstable families, poor peer relationships and educational failure. It is important to clarify whether it is the child's disorder that requires early identification, or these associated factors or both. Second, conduct problems in childhood are generally identified on the basis of a broad cluster of behaviours. The identification of subtypes may lead to a better understanding of underlying mechanisms, and hence to improved matching of treatment to clinical needs. Third, in approximately 50% of children with early conduct problems these do not persist into adolescence and adult life. Ways of distinguishing persisters and desisters are needed. Fourth, given the intractability of behaviour problems in some young children, we need to ask whether identification at an earlier age is possible. Fifth, the adult outcomes of children who show early conduct problems and then desist, and of those whose problems start in adolescence, need to be considered. Finally, we need to attend to the adult outcomes that we are attempting to anticipate. It may be that specific antisocial outcomes have different antecedents from those of antisocial personality disorder.

What is predictive?

It is possible that, because conduct problems are associated with a wide range of adverse individual, family and social factors, the conduct problems per se are not the antecedents of antisocial personality disorder but are markers for these other difficulties that are the true antecedents. In general, the evidence supports conduct problems as true antecedents (Reference Farrington, Loeber, Van Kammen, Robins and RutterFarrington et al, 1990). For example, studies that have assessed both conduct problems and quality of peer relationships, and then followed children over several years, have consistently found that early conduct problems predict later antisocial behaviours (Reference Tremblay, Masse and VitaroTremblay et al, 1995; Reference Woodward and FergussonWoodward & Fergusson, 1999). By contrast, the role of peer relationships has been less clear. This should not, however, be interpreted to mean that the associated factors are unimportant. For example in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, violent crime at the age of 18 years was predicted by the combination of temperamental lack of control (quick to show negative emotions when frustrated, poor impulse control) and number of changes of parental figure before the age of 13 years, which probably reflected a range of family adversities (Reference Henry, Caspi and MoffittHenry et al, 1996).

Sources of heterogeneity in the conduct disorders

Longitudinal studies from childhood to adulthood have used a wide range of ways to characterise conduct problems. Generally they have made use of summary scores generated from a range of questionnaires completed by teachers and parents (Reference Farrington, Loeber, Van Kammen, Robins and RutterFarrington et al, 1990; Reference Fergusson, Lynskey and HorwoodFergusson et al, 1996; Reference Moffitt, Caspi and DicksonMoffitt et al, 1996). The consistency of the findings may suggest that it does not matter much how the problem is defined. Equally, there are pointers to potentially important kinds of heterogeneity. Children with conduct problems and hyperactivity/inattention differ from those with ‘pure’ conduct disorder in that their problems are more severe and likely to persist, and they are more likely to have neuropsychological deficits (Reference LynamLynam, 1996). Lynam (Reference Lynam1998) has argued that children with attention-deficit hyperactivity problems are ‘fledgling psychopaths’, implying that they are more likely to show in adult life the combination of callousness, superficial charm and antisocial behaviour that characterises a sub-group of adults with antisocial personality disorder. Frick and colleagues give priority to callous—unemotional traits in childhood. In a series of studies they have demonstrated that children with antisocial problems who exhibit these traits differ from other children with antisocial problems (Reference Barry, Frick and DeShazoBarry et al, 2000) in apparently having fewer verbal deficits (Reference Loney, Frick and EllisLoney et al, 1998) and in coming from families that are not characterised by dysfunctional parenting practices seen generally in the conduct disorders (Wootton et al, 1997). Children exhibiting callous—unemotional traits may also have a deficit in processing behavioural evidence of distress in others. Associations between scores assessing callous and unemotional characteristics and a reduced ability to recognise fear and sadness have been shown in young adolescents recruited in mainstream schools and children with identified emotional and behavioural problems (Reference Blair and ColesBlair & Coles, 2003; Reference Stevens, Charman and BlairStevens et al, 2001).

Loeber et al (Reference Loeber, Wung and Keenan1993) have proposed that three contrasting patterns of childhood antisocial problems reflect different pathways for different behaviour patterns: an ‘overt’ pathway characterised by bullying, followed by early fighting and proceeding to more serious violence; a ‘covert’ pathway starting with lying and stealing, and going on to more serious damage to property; and an ‘authority conflict’ pathway in which oppositional and defiant behaviours are prominent.

A further distinction, between ‘reactive’ and ‘proactive’ antisocial behaviours, cuts across this three-category typology. Reactive acts occur in response to actual or perceived threat from others, whereas proactive behaviours are initiated by the individuals (Reference Dodge and CoieDodge & Coie, 1987). Reactive aggression is thought to involve angry retaliation, in contrast to the cold unprovoked calculation of proactive aggression. Dodge et al (Reference Dodge, Lochman and Harnish1997) reported that, compared with children showing proactive aggression, ‘reactive’ children were more likely to have been physically abused, to have poor peer relationships, to have shown aggression from an earlier age and to have attention-deficit and hyperactivity symptoms. A central idea in Dodge's model is that reactive aggression is mediated by a readiness to perceive hostile intent in the actions of others. However, the evidence for this is inconsistent. At this stage these can be considered as promising subtypes that may lead to a more precise specification of mechanisms, and hence provide pointers to different kinds of intervention. Longitudinal studies to determine whether they differ in course are needed.

Who are the persisters and desisters?

We have already referred to the poor outlook of children with both conduct disorder and ADHD symptoms. On the basis of retrospective reports within a large epidemiological study, Robins & Price (Reference Robins and Price1991) found that the number of childhood antisocial problems is associated with risk of antisocial personality disorder. Studies within childhood provide some further clues regarding risk of persistence. Loeber et al (Reference Loeber, Green and Lahey2000) found that early fighting and hyperactivity predicted persistence of antisocial behaviours over a 6-year period among boys referred for conduct problems. In a prospective study of a representative general population sample from ages 7-9 years to 14-16 years, persisters had the highest levels of family adversity and lower IQ and self-esteem (Reference Fergusson, Lynskey and HorwoodFergusson et al, 1996). Children with early conduct problems that did not persist had levels of these risk factors that were intermediate between those of persisters and of children who lacked early behavioural problems. Persisters were more likely than those whose early antisocial behaviours had remitted to have a deviant peer group in adolescence. Whether this was a reflection or a cause of persistence is not clear; however, it is consistent with Sampson and Laub's argument that a key factor in determining persistence may be the presence or absence of social bonds and controls (Reference Sampson and LaubSampson & Laub, 1994).

Earlier predictors

We might suppose that, given the stability of conduct problems from the age of 3 years onwards, earlier precursors should be readily identifiable. However, the findings have been inconsistent. For example, the idea has been extensively investigated that early ‘difficult’ temperament, comprising traits such as predominantly negative emotions and ready frustration, contributes to irritable parenting, which in turn increases the risk for conduct problems. Studies using assessments of temperament based on parental reports have yielded some positive findings, but these are vulnerable to parental attributions. Recent studies have failed to demonstrate consistently that observational measures of temperament made in the first year of life predict later conduct problems (Reference Belsky, Hsieh and CrnicBelsky et al, 1998; Reference Aguilar, Sroufe and EgelandAguilar et al, 2000). Early attachment difficulties might be expected to increase the risk for later conduct problems. Here again the evidence is not convincing (Reference HillHill, 2002). It is likely that the quality of parenting in infancy is predictive of later conduct problems (Reference Belsky, Hsieh and CrnicBelsky et al, 1998) and it may be that the most promising approaches to the identification of early predictors will examine specific interactions between infant characteristics and early social experience (Reference Shaw, Owens and VondraShaw et al, 1996; Reference Belsky, Hsieh and CrnicBelsky et al, 1998).

Desisters and later onsets

We have focused so far on boys who show early conduct problems that persist into adult life. It has generally been assumed that those whose conduct problems remit have ‘recovered’. However, recent evidence from the Dunedin Study suggests that although these children are not at increased risk for antisocial outcomes, they are by no means free of difficulties (Reference Moffitt, Caspi and HarringtonMoffitt et al, 2002). At the age of 26 years they had higher rates of depression and anxiety disorders, both self- and informant-rated, and they were socially isolated, with few friends. They shared the poor educational and work records of the life-course persistent group who were antisocial as adults. Likewise, those with onset in adolescence, provisionally termed by Moffitt ‘adolescence limited’, were not free of problems by the age of 26 years. Compared with those who were not significantly antisocial in childhood or adolescence, these young men had higher rates of documented and self-reported drug and property crimes, and their informants reported more depression and anxiety symptoms.

Heterogeneity within antisocial personality disorder

Thus far in this paper the assumption has been made that the DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder category best summarises the antisocial outcomes of interest. There is little doubt that it succeeds as a broad-brush characterisation of antisocial behaviour and associated wider social dysfunction. However, it lacks specificity. In common with all DSM diagnoses, it requires the presence of a number of maladaptive behaviours or mental states identified from a larger set. Hence, the requirements can be met in numerous ways. This may limit the investigation of more specific causal factors, and so a more precise specification of the adult antisocial outcomes may be needed.

The identification of ‘psychopathic disorder’ makes the point. DSM-IV antisocial personality disorder is present in 50-80% of convicted offenders, but a much smaller group of 15-30% are judged to have characteristics such as grandiosity, callousness, deceitfulness, shallow affect and lack of remorse (Reference Hart and HareHart & Hare, 1989). These individuals are more likely than other offenders to have a history of severe and violent offences, and they may also have a distinctive deficit in interpersonal sensitivity. In a comparison of prisoners with and without psychopathic disorder, the groups did not differ in their ability to attribute correctly happiness, sadness and embarrassment to protagonists in short stories. However, in response to guilt stories, those with psychopathic disorder were more likely to attribute happiness or indifference to the protagonists (Reference Blair, Sellars and StricklandBlair et al, 1995). It has been proposed that psychopathy is associated with a failure to inhibit aggression in response to signs of distress in others, arising from a deficit in processing behavioural evidence of that distress (Reference Blair, Jones and ClarkBlair et al, 1997). There is supportive evidence that, compared with other offenders, adults with psychopathic disorder have reduced autonomic responses to distress cues (Reference Chaplin, Rice and HarrisChaplin et al, 1995; Reference Blair, Jones and ClarkBlair et al, 1997). As we saw earlier, a subgroup of children with antisocial problems who exhibit callous—unemotional traits has been identified that may parallel adults with psychopathic disorder. No studies have yet tested for continuity between child and adult psychopathic traits by following these children into adult life.

DISCUSSION

Children at risk for future antisocial personality disorder are readily identified, but evidence on the long-term effectiveness of prevention and treatment programmes is limited. Some progress has been made in identifying subgroups of children with antisocial problems in which different causal processes operate, and therefore for which there are different treatment needs. The available research does not yet tell us whether differences in the patterning, or associated features, of childhood conduct problems are predictive of distinctive adult outcomes. If is possible that this review was subject to selection bias.

Clinical Implications and Limitations

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

  1. The identification and treatment of conduct problems in early childhood are central to the prevention of antisocial personality disorder.

  2. The conduct disorders are heterogeneous in the patterning and course of symptoms, with implications for matching treatment to type of problem.

  3. There is considerable heterogeneity within antisocial personality disorder, so that there is a need to identify specific early indicators of particular adult antisocial outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

  1. Most of the research reviewed in the article refers to antisocial personality disorder in males.

  2. Few longitudinal studies of general populations have included sufficient numbers of antisocial children to explore heterogeneity.

  3. Little is known about very early indicators of children at risk for the development of conduct problems.

References

Aguilar, B. Sroufe, L. A. Egeland, B. et al (2000) Distinguishing the early-onset/persistent and adolescence-onset antisocial behaviour types: from birth to sixteen years. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 109132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn) (DSM–IV). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Barry, C. T. Frick, P. J. DeShazo, T. M. et al (2000) The importance of callous–unemotional traits for extending the concept of psychopathy to children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 335340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J. Hsieh, K-H. & Crnic, K. (1998) Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys' externalising problems and inhibition at age 3 years: differential susceptibility to rearing experience? Development and Psychopathology, 10, 301320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. & Coles, M. (2003) Expression recognition and behavioural problems of early adolescence. Cognitive Development, in press.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. Sellars, C. Strickland, I. et al (1995) Emotion attributions in psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 431437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. Jones, L. Clark, F. et al (1997) The psychopathic individual: a lack of responsiveness to distress cues? Psychophysiology, 34, 192198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaplin, T. C. Rice, M. E. & Harris, G. T. (1995) Salient victim suffering and perceptual responses of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J. D. (1987) Social information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 11461157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A. Lochman, J. E. Harnish, J. D. et al (1997) Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impaired chronically assaultative youths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 3751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. Loeber, R. & Van Kammen, W. B. (1990) Long-term criminal outcomes of hyperactivity–impulsivity–attention-deficit and conduct problems in childhood. In Straight and Devious Pathways from Childhood to Adulthood (eds Robins, L. N. & Rutter, M. R.), pp. 6281. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D. M. Lynskey, M. T. & Horwood, L. J. (1996) Factors associated with continuity and changes in disruptive behavior patterns between childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 24, 533553.Google ScholarPubMed
Hart, S. D. & Hare, R. D. (1989) Discriminant validity of the Psychopathy Checklist in a forensic psychiatric population. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, B. Caspi, A. Moffitt, T. E. et al (1996) Temperamental and familial predictors of violent and non-violent criminal convictions: from age 3 to age 18. Development Psychopathology, 32, 614623.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2002) Biological, psychological and social processes in the conduct disorders. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 43, 133164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. E. (1997) Parent management training: evidence, outcomes and issues. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 13491356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazdin, A. E. (2000) Treatment of conduct disorders. In Conduct Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence (eds Hill, J. & Maughan, B.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LeMarquand, D. Tremblay, R. & Vitaro, R. (2001) The prevention of conduct disorder: are view of successful and unsuccessful experiments. In Conduct Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence (eds Hill, J. & Maughan, B.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Loeber, R. Wung, P. Keenan, K. et al (1993) Developmental pathways in disruptive child behaviour. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 101132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeber, R. Green, S. M. Lahey, B. B. et al (2000) Physical fighting in childhood as a risk factor for later mental health problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 421428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loney, B. R. Frick, P. J. Ellis, M. et al (1998) Intelligence, psychopathy, and antisocial behaviour. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 20, 231247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynam, D. R. (1996) The early identification of chronic offenders: who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynam, D. R. (1998) Early identification of the fledgling psychopath: locating the psychopathic child in the current nomenclature. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 566575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E. Caspi, A. Dickson, N. et al (1996) Childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset antisocial conduct in males: natural history from 3 to 18. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 399424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. Caspi, A. Harrington, H. et al (2002) Males on the life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: follow-up at age 26. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. N. (1966) Deviant Children Grown-Up: A Sociological and Psychiatric Study of Sociopathic Personalities. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
Robins, L. N. & Price, R. K. (1991) Adult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems: results from the NIMH Epidemiological Catchment Area Project. Psychiatry, 542, 116132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Routh, C. P. Hill, J. W. Steele, H. et al (1995) Maternal attachment status, psychosocial stressors and problem behaviour: follow-up after parent training courses for conduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 11791198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruma, P. R. Burke, R. V. & Thompson, R. W. (1996) Group parent training: is it effective for children of all ages? Behavior Therapy, 27, 159169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. & Laub, J. H. (1994) Urban poverty and the family context of delinquency: a new look at structure and process in a classic study. Child Development, 65, 523540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D. S. Owens, E. B. Vondra, J. I. et al (1996) Early risk factors and pathways in the development of early disruptive behavioural problems. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 679700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, D. Charman, T. & Blair, R. J. R. (2001) Recognition of emotion in facial expressions and vocal tones in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 201211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, J. M. Kraemer, H. C. Hinshaw, S. P. et al (2001) Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 168179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tremblay, R. E. Masse, L. C. Vitaro, F. et al (1995) The impact of friends'deviant behaviour on early onset of delinquency: longitudinal data from six to thirteen years of age. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 649668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, L. J. & Fergusson, D. M. (1999) Childhood peer relationship problems and psychosocial adjustment in late adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 87104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wooton, J. N. Frick, P. J. Shelton, K. K. et al (1997) Ineffective parenting and childhood conduct problems: the moderating role of callous–unemotional traits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.
You have Access
50
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Early identification of individuals at risk for antisocial personality disorder
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Early identification of individuals at risk for antisocial personality disorder
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Early identification of individuals at risk for antisocial personality disorder
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *