Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up

  • G. Dunn (a1), M. Maracy (a1), C. Dowrick (a2), J. L. Ayuso-Mateos (a3), O. S. Dalgard (a4), H. Page (a5), V. Lehtinen (a6), P. Casey (a7), C. Wilkinson (a8), J. L. Vázquez-Barquero (a9), G. Wilkinson (a10) and Odin Group...
Abstract
Background

The Outcomes of Depression International Network (ODIN) trial evaluated the effect of two psychological interventions for the treatment of depression in primary care. Only about half of the patients in the treatment arm complied with the offer of treatment, prompting the question: ‘what was the effect of treatment in those patients who actually received it?’

Aims

To illustrate the estimation of the effect of receipt of treatment in a randomised controlled trial subject to non-compliance and loss to follow-up.

Method

We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) of treatment.

Results

In the ODIN trial the effect of receipt of psychological intervention (an average of about 4 points on the Beck Depression Inventory) is about twice that of offering it.

Conclusions

The statistical analysis of the results of a clinical trial subject to noncompliance to allocated treatment is now reasonably straightforward through estimation of a CACE and investigators should be encouraged to present the results of analyses of this type as a routine component of a trial report.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Graham Dunn, Biostatistics Group, School of Epidemiology & Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. E-mail: g.dunn@man.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements. Paper accepted when GW was Editor of the Journal.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Ayuso-Mateos, J. L. Våzquez-Barquero, J. L. Dowrick, C. et al (2001) Depressive disorders in Europe: prevalence figures from the ODIN study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 308316.
Angrist, J. D. Imbens, G. W. & Rubin, D. B. (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444472.
Beck, A. Ward, C. Mendelson, M. et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561571.
Bedi, N. Lee, A. Harrison, G. et al (2000) Assessing effectiveness of treatment of depression in primary care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 312318.
Bloom, H. S. (1984) Accounting for no-shows in experimental evaluation designs. Evaluation Review, 8, 225246.
Brewin, C. & Bradley, C. (1989) Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials. BMJ, 299, 313315.
Dalgard, O. S. & Børve, T. (2000) Psychoedukativ intervensjon ved depresjon. In Ny viten om psykisk heise – utbrdedelse og forebryggende tilka. Oslo: Norges forskninsråd.
Dowrick, C. Dunn, G. Ayuso-Mateos, J.-L. et al (2000) Problem solving treatment and group psychoeducation for depression: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 321, 450–445.
Dunn, G. (2002a) The challenge of patient choice and nonadherence to treatment in randomized controlled trials of counselling or psychotherapy. Understanding Statistics, 1, 1929.
Dunn, G. (2002b) Estimating the causal effects of treatment. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale, 11, 206215.
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall.
Frangakis, C. E. & Rubin, D. B. (1999) Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika, 86, 365379.
Heckman, J. Smith, J. & Taber, C. (1998) Accounting fordropoutsin evaluations ofsocial programs. Reviewof Economics and Statistics, 80, 114.
Hirano, K. Imbens, G. W. Rubin, D. B. et al (2000) Assessing the effect of an influenzavaccinein an encouragement design. Biostatistics, 1, 6988.
Hollis, S. & Campbell, F. (1999) What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomized controlled trials. BMJ, 319, 670674.
Jo, B. (2002a) Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of intervention with noncompliance. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 31613181.
Jo, B. (2002b) Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 27, 673709.
Jo, B. & Muthén, B. (2001) Modeling of intervention effects with noncompliance: a latent variable approach for randomized trials. In New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling (eds Marcooulides, G. A. & Schumacher, R. H.), pp. 5787. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Little, R. J. & Yau, L. H. Y. (1998) Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: treatment of no-shows using Rubin's causal model. Psychological Methods, 3, 147159.
Little, R. J. & Rubin, R. B. (2002) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2nd edn). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
McPherson, K. & Britton, A. (2001) Preferences and understanding their effects on health. Quality in Health Care, 10 (suppl. 1), i61i66.
Muthén, L. K. & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2001) Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén&Muthén(see http://www.statmodel.com/version2.html for detais of Mplus Version 2.12).
Newcombe, R. G. (1988) Explanatory and pragmatic estimates of the treatment effect when deviations from allocated treatment occur. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 11791186.
Rücker, G. (1989) A two-stage trial design for testing treatment, self-selection and treatment preference effects. Statistics in Medicine, 8, 477485.
Sheiner, L. B. & Rubin, D. B. (1995) Intention-to-treat and the goals of clinical trials. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 57, 615.
Sommer, A. & Zeger, S. L. (1991) On estimating efficacy from clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 10, 4552.
StataCorp (2001) Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
Torgerson, D. J. Klaber-Moffett, J. & Russell, I. T. (1996) Patient preferences in randomised trials: threat or opportunity? Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 1, 194197.
Vinokur, A. D. & Schul, Y. (1997) Mastery and inoculation against setbacks as active ingredients in intervention for the unemployed. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 867877.
Vinokur, A. D. Price, R. H. & Schul, Y. (1995) Impact of the JOBS intervention on unemployed workers varying in risk for depression. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 3974.
Ward, E. King, M. Lloyd, M. et al (2000) Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. I: Clinical effectiveness. BMJ, 321, 13831388.
Yau, L. H. Y. & Little, R. J. (2001) Inference for the complier-average causal effect from longitudinal data subject to noncompliance and missing data, with application to a job training assessment for the unemployed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 12321243.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • ISSN: 0007-1250
  • EISSN: 1472-1465
  • URL: /core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 17 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 25th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Estimating psychological treatment effects from a randomised controlled trial with both non-compliance and loss to follow-up

  • G. Dunn (a1), M. Maracy (a1), C. Dowrick (a2), J. L. Ayuso-Mateos (a3), O. S. Dalgard (a4), H. Page (a5), V. Lehtinen (a6), P. Casey (a7), C. Wilkinson (a8), J. L. Vázquez-Barquero (a9), G. Wilkinson (a10) and Odin Group...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *