Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-dbm8p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T09:03:50.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Memorandum in Reply to a Request for Information Received from the Advisory Group on the Law of Rape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2025

Extract

The three main issues discussed were those of: (1) anonymity; (2) revealing the victim’s sexual history; and (3) whether or not women sometimes make false claims of rape.

This memorandum was prepared at short notice by a group of members of the College, representing different interests and with varying experience. The outstanding finding was that few of the questions could be answered clearly and that differences of opinion of a most polar nature occurred in many cases. This was found to be due to two main factors: (a) the perhaps unrecognized fact that the experience of psychiatrists, in general, in connection with cases of rape is surprisingly small; and (b) that rape, in fact, is not a clinical entity but a collection of a number of different forms of sexual behaviour, backed by varied circumstances and personalities, so that single answers to any question from a psychiatric point of view could hardly be expected. We also found that all the issues were closely linked and interdependent.

Information

Type
The Royal College of Psychiatrists
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Approved by Council on 16 October 1975.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.