Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need: Impact of the Supervision Register Policy

  • Jonathan Bindman (a1), Andrew Beck (a1), Graham Thornicroft (a1), Martin Knapp (a1) and George Szmukler (a1)...

Abstract

Background

Mental health provider trusts in England were required in 1994 to establish local Supervision Registers of patients at risk.

Aims

To identify the factors associated with registration, and obtain clinicians' views on its effectiveness.

Method

At a random sample of 14 trusts data were collected from case notes, keyworkers and responsible medical officers.

Results

A sample of 133 registered patients were more disabled and had more extensive histories of violence and self-harm than 126 comparison patients on the upper tier of the Care Programme Approach (CPA). Those registered were a heterogeneous group. For some there was little evidence of risk. In most cases clinicians did not believe registration had improved care.

Conclusions

The Supervision Register policy has not resulted in the identification of a well-defined group. Its effectiveness is limited by the lack of operationalised measures of risk.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

Jonathan Bindman, Section of Community Psychiatry (PRiSM), Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF

Footnotes

Hide All

Declaration of interest

This study was funded by a grant from the Department of Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bindman, J., Beck, A., Glover, G., et al (1999) Evaluating mental health policy in England. Care Programme Approach and Supervision Registers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 327330.
Caldicott, F. (1994) Supervision Registers: the College's response. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 385386.
Department of Health (1995) Health of the Nation: Building Bridges. A Guide to Interagency Working for the Care and Protection of Severely Mentally III People. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health (1999) Effective Care Co-Ordination in Mental Health Services. Modernising Mental Health Services. London: Department of Health.
Dobson, F. (1998) Frank Dobson outlines third way for mental health. http://www.coi.gov.uk/coi/depts/GDH
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R. L., Fleiss, J. L., et al (1976) The Global Assessment Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766771.
Glover, G., McCulloch, A. W. & Jenkins, R. (1994) Supervision Registers for mentally ill people. British Medical Journal, 309, 809810.
Gunnell, D. & Frankel, S. (1994) Prevention of suicide: aspirations and evidence. British Medical Journal, 308, 12271233.
Harrison, K. (1994) Supervision in the community. New Law Journal, 144, 1017.
Holloway, F. (1994) Supervision Registers. Recent government policy and legislation. Psychiatric Bulletin, 18, 593596.
House of Commons Health Committee (1993) Community Supervision Orders. Health Committee 5th Report. Vol. I. London: HMSO.
Laugharne, R. (1994) Most patients in Bow and Poplar would be on the register. British Medical Journal, 309, 1159.
Monahan, J. (1994) Towards a rejuvenation of risk assessment research. In Violence and Mental Disorder. Developments in Risk Assessment (eds Monahan, J. & Steadman, J.), pp. 117. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
NHS Executive (1994) Introduction of Supervision Registers for Mentally III People from 1 April 1994. (HSG(94)5.) Leeds: NHS Executive.
Phelan, M., Slade, M., Thornicroft, G., et al (1995) The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 589595.
Pinfold, V., Bindman, J., Friedli, K., et al (1999) Supervised Discharge Orders in England: compulsory care in the community. Psychiatric Bulletin, 23, 199203.
Pugh, R., Gardner, J. & Allen, R. (1994) Implications of Supervision Registers in Psychiatry. British Medical Journal, 309, 611.
STATA Corporation (1997) STATA Statistical Software: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: STATA Corporation.
Shaw, J., Appleby, L., Amos, T., et al (1999) Mental disorder and clinical care in people convicted of homicide: national clinical survey. British Medical Journal, 318, 12401244.
Wing, J. K., Beevor, A. S., Curtis, R. H., et al (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 1118.

Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need: Impact of the Supervision Register Policy

  • Jonathan Bindman (a1), Andrew Beck (a1), Graham Thornicroft (a1), Martin Knapp (a1) and George Szmukler (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Psychiatric patients at greatest risk and in greatest need: Impact of the Supervision Register Policy

  • Jonathan Bindman (a1), Andrew Beck (a1), Graham Thornicroft (a1), Martin Knapp (a1) and George Szmukler (a1)...
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *