Otto, R, Douglas, K. Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment.
Conroy, MA, Murrie, DC. Forensic Assessment of Violence Risk.
Buchanan, A, Binder, R, Norko, M, Swartz, M. Psychiatric violence risk
assessment. Am J Psychiatry
Higgins, N, Watts, D, Bindman, J, Slade, M, Thornicroft, G. Assessing violence risk in general adult
psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull
2005; 29: 131–3.
Tolman, A, Mullendore, K. Risk evaluations for the courts: is service quality
a function of specialization?
Prof Psychol Res Prac
2003; 34: 225–32.
Viljoen, JL, McLachlan, K, Vincent, GM. Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile
and adult offenders: a survey of clinical practices.
2010; 17: 377–95.
Tyrer, P. An agitation of contrary opinions.
Br J Psychiatry
Hart, SD, Michie, C, Cooke, DJ. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments.
Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of
violence. Br J Psychiatry
Cook, N. Use and misuse of the receiver operating
characteristic curve in risk prediction.
2007; 115: 928–35.
Singh, JP, Grann, M, Fazel, S. A comparative study of violence risk assessment
tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies
involving 25,980 participants. Clin Psychol
Helmus, L, Hanson, RK, Thornton, D, Babchishin, KM, Harris, AJR. Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R
and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples:
a meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav
2012; 39: 1148–71.
Looman, J. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for
sexual offenders. Sex Abuse
Helmus, L, Hanson, K, Thornton, D. Reporting Static-99 in light of new research on
recidivism norms. Forum
Mossman, D. Another look at interpreting risk
categories. Sex Abuse
Singh, JP, Fazel, S. Forensic risk assessment: a
metareview. Crim Justice Behav
2010; 37: 965–88.
Andrews, DA, Bonta, J. LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory – Revised.
Hare, RD. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised.
Quinsey, VL, Harris, GT, Rice, ME, Cormier, CA. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk.
American Psychological Association,
Harris, AJR, Phenix, A, Hanson, RK, Thornton, D. Static-99 Coding Rules: Revised 2003.
Solicitor General Canada,
Webster, CD, Douglas, KS, Eaves, D, Hart, SD. HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence.
Simon Fraser University,
Boer, DP, Hart, SD, Kropp, PR, Webster, CD. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Professional
Guidelines for Assessing Risk of Sexual Violence.
Simon Fraser University,
Kropp, PR, Hart, SD, Webster, CD, Eaves, D. Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA).
Borum, R, Bartel, P, Forth, A. Manual for the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in
Youth (SAVRY): Version 1.1.
University of South Florida,
Landis, JR, Koch, GG. The measurement of observer agreement for
categorical data. Biometrics
1977; 33: 159–74.
Arbach, K, Pueyo, AA. Violence risk assessment in mental disorders with
the HCR-20. Papeles del Psicologo
2007; 28: 174–86.
Beggs, SM, Grace, RC. Psychopathy, intelligence, and recidivism in child
molesters: evidence of an interaction effect.
Crim Justice Behav
2008; 35: 683–95.
Bengtson, S. Is newer better? A cross-validation of the
Static-2002 and the Risk Matrix 2000 in a Danish sample of sexual
offenders. Psychol Crim Law
Caperton, JD. Predicting Recidivism among Sex Offenders: Utility of the
STATIC-99, Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised, and Psychopathy
Checklist-Revised. Sam Houston State
Dahle, KP. Strengths and limitations of actuarial prediction of
criminal reoffense in a German prison sample: a comparative study of
LSI-R, HCR-20 and PCL-R. Int J Law
2006; 29: 431–42.
De Vogel, V, de Ruiter, C. The HCR-20 in personality disordered female
offenders: a comparison with a matched sample of males.
Clin Psychol Psychother
2005; 12: 226–40.
De Vogel, V, de Ruiter, C, van, Beek, Mead, G. Predictive validity of the SVR-20 and Static-99 in a
Dutch sample of treated sex offenders. Law Hum
2004; 28: 235–51.
Dempster, RJ. Prediction of Sexually Violent Recidivism: A Comparison of
Risk Assessment Instruments. Simon Fraser
Dempster, RJ. Understanding Errors in Risk Assessment: The Application of
Differential Prediction Methodology. Simon
Fraser University, 2001.
Douglas, KS, Ogloff, JRP, Hart, SD. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment
among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatr
2003; 54: 1372–9.
Douglas, KS, Yeomans, M, Boer, DP. Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures
of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders.
Crim Justice Behav
Eher, R, Rettenberger, M, Matthes, A. Aktuarische prognose bei Sexualstraftaetern
[Actuarial predictions of sexual offenders].
Eher, R, Rettenberger, M, Schilling, F, Pfäfflin, F. Failure of Static-99 and SORAG to predict reoffense
categories in relevant sexual offender subtypes: a prospective
study. Sex Offend Treat
Folino, J, Almiron, M, Ricci, MA. Factores de riesgo de recidiva violenta en mujeres
filicidas [Violent recidivism risk factor in filicidal
2007; 18: 258–67.
Friendship, C, Mann, RE, Beech, AR. Evaluation of a national prison-based treatment
program for sexual offenders in England and Wales.
J Interpers Viol
2003; 18: 744–59.
Gammelgard, M, Koivisto, AM, Eronen, M, Kaltiala-Heino, R. The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment
of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among institutionalised
adolescents. J Forensic Psychiatr
2008; 19: 352–70.
Gibas, AL, Kropp, PR, Hart, SD, Stewart, L. Validity of the SARA in a Canadian Sample of Incarcerated
Adult Males. International Association of
Forensic Mental Health Services,
Grann, M, Belfrage, H, Tengstrom, A. Actuarial assessment of risk for violence:
predictive validity of the VRAG and the historical part of the
HCR-20. Crim Justice Behav
Grann, M, Langstrom, N, Tengstrom, A, Kullgren, G. Psychopathy (PCL-R) predicts violent recidivism
among criminal offenders with personality disorders in
Sweden. Law Hum Behav
1999; 23: 205–17.
Gretton, H, Abramowitz, C. SAVRY: Contribution of Items and Scales to Clinical Risk
Judgments and Criminal Outcomes. American
Psychology Law Society,
Harris, GT, Rice, ME, Quinsey, VL, Lalumiere, ML, Boer, D, Lang, C. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments
for sex offenders. Psychol Assess
2003; 15: 413–25.
Helmus, LMD, Hanson, RK. Predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-2002
for sex offenders on community supervision. Sex
Hill, A, Habermann, N, Klusmann, D, Berner, W, Briken, P. Criminal recidivism in sexual homicide
perpetrators. Int J Offender Ther Comp
Ho, H, Thomson, L, Darjee, R. Violence risk assessment: the use of the PCL-SV,
HCR-20, and VRAG to predict violence in mentally disordered offenders
discharged from a medium secure unit in Scotland.
J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol
2009; 4: 523–41.
Jovanovic, AA, Tosevski, DL, Ivkonvic, M, Damjanovic, A, Gasic, MJ. Predicting violence in veterans with posttraumatic
stress disorder. Vojnosanit Pregl
Kingston, DA, Yates, PM, Firestone, P, Babchishin, K, Bradford, JM. Long-term predictive validity of the Risk Matrix
2000: a comparison with the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal
Guide. Sex Abuse
2008; 20: 466–84.
Kloezeman, KC. Violent Behavior on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: The HCR-20
Violence Risk Assessment Scheme. University of
Kropp, PR, Hart, SD. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) guide:
reliability and validity in adult male offenders.
Law Hum Behav
2000; 24: 101–18.
Lodewijks, HPB, Doreleijers, TAH, de Ruiter, C. SAVRY risk assessment in violent Dutch adolescents:
relation to sentencing and recidivism. Crim
Lodewijks, HPB, de Ruiter, C, Doreleijers, TAH. Gender differences in violent outcome and risk
assessment in adolescent offenders after residential
treatment. Int J Forensic Ment Health
2008; 7: 105–41.
Lodewijks, HPB, Doreleijers, TAH, de Ruiter, C, Borum, R. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of
Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential
treatment. Int J Law Psychiatr
2008; 31: 263–71.
Looman, J, Abracen, J. Comparison of measures of risk for recidivism in
sexual offenders. J Interpers Viol
McEachran, A. The Predictive Validity of the PCL:YV and the SAVRY in a
Population of Adolescent Offenders. Simon Fraser
Meyers, JR, Schmidt, F. Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of
Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders.
Crim Justice Behav
2008; 35: 344–55.
Mills, JF, Kroner, DG. The effect of discordance among violence and general
recidivism risk estimates on predictive accuracy.
Crim Behav Ment Health
2006; 16: 155–66.
Morrissey, C, Hogue, T, Mooney, P, Allen, C, Johnston, S, Hollin, C, et al.
Predictive validity of the PCL-R in offenders with
intellectual disability in a high secure hospital setting: institutional
aggression. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol
Pedersen, L, Rasmussen, K, Elsass, P. Risk assessment: the value of structured
professional judgments. Int J Forensic Ment
Polvi, NH. The Prediction of Violence in Pre-trial Forensic Patients:
The Relative Efficacy of Statistical versus Clinical Predictions of
Dangerousness. Simon Fraser
Reeves, KA, Kropp, PR, Cairns, K. An Independent Validation Study of the SARA.
International Association of Forensic Mental Health
Rettenberger, M, Eher, R. Predicting reoffense in sexual offender subtypes: a
prospective validation study of the German version of the Sexual Offender
Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG). Sex Offend
Rice, ME, Harris, GT. Men who molest their sexually immature daughters: is
a special examination required?
J Abnorm Psychol
2002; 111: 329–39.
Seto, MC, Barbaree, HE. Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender
recidivism. J Interpers Viol
1999; 14: 1235–48.
Snowden, RJ, Gray, NS, Taylor, J, MacCulloch, MJ. Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in
mentally disordered offenders. Psychol
2007; 37: 1539–49.
Snowden, RJ, Gray, NS, Taylor, J, Fitzgerald, S. Assessing risk of future violence among forensic
psychiatric inpatients with the Classification of Violence Risk
(COVR). Psychiatr Serv
2009; 60: 1522–6.
Viljoen, JL, Scalora, M, Cuadra, L, Bader, S, Chavez, V, Ullman, D, et al.
Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually
offended: a comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and
SAVRY. Crim Justice Behav
Walkington, Z, O'Keeffe, C, Thomas, S. Predicting Violence Recidivism in Violent Juveniles: A UK
Trial. HM Prison Service,
Wormith, JS, Olver, ME, Stevenson, HE, Girard, L. The long-term prediction of offender recidivism
using diagnostic, personality, and risk/need approaches to offender
assessment. Psychol Serv
Szmukler, G. Violence risk prediction in
practice. Br J Psychiatry
2001; 178: 84–5.
Fazel, S, Singh, JP, Doll, H, Grann, M. The prediction of violence and antisocial behaviour:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of risk assessment
instruments in 73 samples involving 24,827 individuals.
Eastman, N, Adshead, G, Fox, S, Latham, R, Whyte, S. Forensic Psychiatry. Oxford
University Press, 2012.
Bayes, T, Price, R. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine
of chances. Phil Trans Royal Society
Arkes, HR. Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and
possible ways to minimize their impact. J Consult
1981; 49: 323–30.
Arkes, HR. Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications
for debiasing. Psychol Bull
1991; 110: 486–98.
Guy, LS. Performance Indicators of the Structured Professional
Judgment Approach for Assessing Risk for Violence to Others: A
Meta-analytic Survey. Simon Fraser
Hilton, N, Carter, A, Harris, G, Sharpe, A. Does using nonnumerical terms to describe risk aid
violence risk communication?
J Interpers Viol
2008; 23: 171–88.
Lidz, C, Mulvey, E, Gardner, W. The accuracy of predictions of violence to
1993; 269: 1007–11.
McNiel, DE, Binder, RL. Correlates of accuracy in the assessment of
psychiatric inpatients' risk of violence. Am J
1995; 152: 901–6.
Rabinowitz, J, Garelik-Wyler, R. Accuracy and confidence in clinical assessment of
psychiatric inpatients risk of violence. Int J
Dean, K, Walsh, E, Moran, P, Tyrer, P, Creed, F, Byford, S, et al.
Violence in women with psychosis in the community:
prospective study. Br J Psychiatry
2006; 188: 264–70.
Singh, JP, Serper, M, Reinharth, J, Fazel, S. Structured assessment of violence risk in
schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of the
validity, reliability, and item content of 10 available
instruments. Schizophr Bull
Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and
1974; 185: 1124–31.