Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness

  • Michael King (a1), Sokratis Dinos (a1), Jenifer Shaw (a2), Robert Watson (a2), Scott Stevens (a2), Filippo Passetti (a1), Scott Weich (a3) and Marc Serfaty (a4)...



There is concern about the stigma of mental illness, but it is difficult to measure stigma consistently.


To develop a standardised instrument to measure the stigma of mental illness.


We used qualitative data from interviews with mental health service users to develop a pilot scale with 42 items. We recruited 193 service users in order to standardise the scale. Of these, 93 were asked to complete the questionnaire twice, 2 weeks apart, of whom 60 (65%) did so. Items with a test–retest reliability kappa coefficient of 0.4 or greater were retained and subjected to common factor analysis.


The final 28-item stigma scale has a three-factor structure: the first concerns discrimination, the second disclosure and the third potential positive aspects of mental illness. Stigma scale scores were negatively correlated with global self-esteem.


This self-report questionnaire, which can be completed in 5–10 min, may help us understand more about the role of stigma of psychiatric illness in research and clinical settings.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness
      Available formats


Corresponding author

Professor Michael King, Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 4QP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)20 7830 2397; email:


Hide All

Declaration of interest




Hide All
Bhugra, D. (1989) Attitudes towards mental illness: a review of the literature. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 80, 112.
Byrne, P. (1997) Psychiatric stigma: past, passing and to come. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 90, 618621.
Camp, D. L., Finlay, W. M. L. & Lyons, E. (2002) Is low self-esteem inevitable in stigma? Social Science and Medicine, 55, 823834.
Corrigan, P.W. (2000) Mental health stigma as social attribution: implications for research methods and attitude change. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 4867.
Corrigan, P. (2004) How stigma interferes with mental health care. American Psychologist, 59, 614625.
Corrigan, P.W. & Watson, A. C. (2002) The paradox ofself-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 3553.
Corrigan, P. W., River, L. P., Lundin, R. K., et al (2000) Stigmatising attributions about mental illness. Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 91102.
Corrigan, P. W., Edwards, A. B., Green, A., et al (2001) Familiarity with and social distance from people who have serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 953958.
Corrigan, P., Thompson, V., Lambert, D., et al (2003) Perceptions of discrimination among persons with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 54, 11051110.
Crocker, J. & Major, B. (1989) Social Stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608630.
Crocker, J. & Wolfe, C. T. (2001) Contigencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 08, 593623.
Day, N. E. & Shoenrade, P. (2000) The relationship among reported disclosure of sexual orientation, anti-discrimination policies, top management support and work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees. Personnel Review, 29, 346363.
Dinos, S., Stevens, S., Serfaty, M., et al (2004) Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Qualitative study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 84, 176181.
Dinos, S., Lyons, E. & Finlay, W. M. L. (2005) Does chronic illness place constraints on positive constructions of identity? Temporal comparisons and self-evaluations in people with mental illness. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 22392248.
Dovidio, J. F., Major, B. & Crocker, J. (2000) Stigma: introduction and overview. In The Social Psychology of Stigma (eds Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R., et al), pp. 113. Guilford.
Finlay, W. M. L., Dinos, S. & Lyons, E. (2001) Stigma and multiple social comparisons in people with schizophrenia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 579592.
Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Penguin.
Hayward, P. & Bright, J. A. (1997) Stigma and mental illness: areview and critique. Journal of Mental Illness, 6, 345354.
Jacoby, A. (1994) Felt versus enacted stigma: a concept revisited: evidence from a study of people with epilepsy in remission. Social Science and Medicine, 38, 269274.
Judge, A. B. (1998) Psychotherapy and stigma scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure stigma as it is attached to seeking psychotherapy. Dissertation Abstracts International Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 58, 5123.
Link, B. G., Struening, E. L., Neese-Todd, S., et al (2001) Stigma as a barrier to recovery: the consequences of stigma for the self-esteem of people wiith mentall illness. Psychiatric Services, 52, 16211626.
Link, B. G., Miritznik, J. & Cullem, F. T. (1991) The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations: can negative consequences of mental illness labelling be avoided? Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 32, 302320.
Ritchie, J. H., Dick, D. & Lingham, R. (1994) The Report of the Inquiry into the Care and Treatment of Christopher Clunis. HMSO.
Ritsher, J. B., Otilingham, P. G. & Grajales, M. (2003) Internalised stigma of mental illness: psychometric properties of a new measure. Psychiatry Research, 121, 3149.
Rosenberg, M. (1965) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1979) Conceiving the Self. Basic Books.
Rusch, N., Angermeyer, M. C. & Corrigan, P.W. (2005) Mental illness stigma: concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European Psychiatry, 20, 529539.
Rusch, N., Lieb, K., Bohus, M., et al (2006) Self-stigma, empowerment, and perceived legitimacy of discrimination among women with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 399402.
Rush, L. L. (1998) Affective reactions to multiple social stigmas. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 421430.
Wolff, G., Pathare, S., Craig, T., et al (1996) Community attitudes to mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 168, 183190.

The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness

  • Michael King (a1), Sokratis Dinos (a1), Jenifer Shaw (a2), Robert Watson (a2), Scott Stevens (a2), Filippo Passetti (a1), Scott Weich (a3) and Marc Serfaty (a4)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness

  • Michael King (a1), Sokratis Dinos (a1), Jenifer Shaw (a2), Robert Watson (a2), Scott Stevens (a2), Filippo Passetti (a1), Scott Weich (a3) and Marc Serfaty (a4)...
Submit a response


There is More to Stigmatization

Rahman Haghighat, Consultant
07 September 2007

I thank Michael King and co-authors for responding to my letter regarding their work. I was nevertheless concerned that they did not take on board almost any of the various points I raised. With respect, I think that it is our capacity for self-criticism or accepting others’ criticism that advances science. Their response regrettably further shows their profound misunderstanding of stigmatisation. Therein, they say their paperis about ‘perceived stigma’ and that they have never claimed otherwise. Yet, both in their paper title and the aims section they refer to measurement of the ‘stigma of mental illness’ in general which is an awesomely complex concept with diverse varieties including enacted, expected, perceived, attributed and felt stigmatization (Scambler, 1989, Haghighat, 2001). As such, I find the title and aims sections something ofan over-claiming as the rest of the paper, being about perceived stigma, frustrates the reader’s expectation and fails to support the title and aims.

The authors make a number of axiomatic comments such as “perceived stigma may cause or maintain depressive episodes” without acknowledging its reverse too: depressive symptoms and persecutory ideations are fertilegrounds for over-perceiving stigmatization. Therefore, such perception cannot be used as an accurate and objective measure of social stigmatization. I do not intend to dismiss, as purely “paranoid or depressive epiphenomena”, users’ real and painful experience of rejection and marginalization nor the social reality of stigmatization, rather I wish to emphasize that such perceptions are confounded by the effect of their mental state and cannot be used by investigators as an objective measure of stigmatization. As scientific observers we need to separate real social phenomena stigmatizing people (which need social intervention such as educational, or policy intervention, Haghighat, 2003) from over-perceived stigmatization or self-stigmatization (which needs individual reality orientation, psychotherapy or re-construction of self-esteem).

Professor King and co-authors emphasize that not everyone in their sample had depressive disorder, [and so the total ‘perceived stigma’ cannot be partly due to the effect of the mental state]. They surprisinglyoverlook the mood component (as a dimension and not a diagnosis) prevalentin a large number of psychiatric conditions including schizoaffective disorders, anxiety disorders and personality disorders. Also, persecutory ideations can be seen in almost all psychiatric conditions and are not restricted to depression. Further, the authors do not seem to have noticedthe references at the end of my earlier letter, solid evidence for the presence of high rates of low self-esteem in a large number of psychiatricconditions, depression or otherwise. Though low self-esteem can be inducedor worsened by social stigmatization it is also a powerful catalyst for over-perceiving such stigmatization.

There is no doubt in the enriching quality of a trying life experience such as a mental illness for some people. Nonetheless, people who report positive aspects to their mental illness have not necessarily perceived less stigmatization than those who do not report such positive aspects. On the contrary, they may have been stigmatised tremendously moreand are reclaiming the lost sense of personal value, normality and intelligence as a means of withstanding stigmatisation. This phenomenon iscalled revalorization or reclaiming in which people erect defences to compensate for the intensity of their perceived stigmatisation. Estroff (1982), reporting the narratives of users whom she and her colleagues studied, refers to what she called ‘normalising talk’ by users. The normalising talk attempts to persuade others that the patient is worthwhile, is enriched by the experience of illness, is one of us, and normal. This indeed can be nothing other than reclaiming value and dignityfor acutely perceived stigmatization that the authors have misconstrued asevidence of less perceived stigma. “The deaf are intelligent,” “The black are beautiful”. “Schizophrenic means brainy”, proclaimed by the stigmatised, are examples of revalorisation due to stigmatisation that hasbeen extensively exposed in sociological literature (for example, Sacks, 1989) which the authors have missed in their work. Finally, randomisationis required in attitudinal surveys to reduce investigators’ bias in selecting subjects, irrespective of the investigators’ honest wish to be impartial (subjects who are more vocal, more cooperative or who have already expressed ideas about the subject of survey are unconsciously morelikely to be approached by key workers, investigators etc.) which inevitably may corroborate investigators’ previously held hypothesis through a biased sample.

Estroff, S. E. (1982) Long-term Psychiatric Clients in an American Community: Some Sociocultural Factors in Mental Illness. In Clinically Applied Anthropology (eds N. Chrisman & T. W. Maretzki). Reidel. Haghighat, R. (2001) Stigmatisation of People with Schizophrenia. PhD Dissertation, University of London. Haghighat, R. (2003) A Preventive Strategy for Schizophrenia: from primitive drives to development of a new society. In Intervention for Schizophrenic Disorders, pp. 130-158 (ed. A. Grispini). Giovani Fioriti. Sacks, O. (1989) Seeing Voices. University of California Press. Scambler, G. (1989) Epilepsy. Routledge.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

The Stigma Scale - authors' reply

Michael B King, Professor of Psychiatry
27 June 2007

We were puzzled by Rahman Haghighat’s criticism of our development of a stigma scale and would like to respond to his points. First, ours is a self-report measure of perceived stigma and we do not claim otherwise. Perceived stigma is a valuable construct that may have a greater impact on future mental and social well-being (including relationships and occupation) than so-called objective acts of discrimination. This is also true of social support. Second, we agree that the relationship between perceived stigma and low self esteem is potentially confounded by low mood. However our sample contained a heterogeneous group of participants from a range of settings and thus it is unlikely that a sizeable proportion were depressed at the time of the study. In addition, Dr Haghighat overlooks the complexity of any putative association between stigma and depressive symptoms. Perceived stigma may cause or maintain depressive episodes. Third, it is important to avoid invalidating reports of perceived stigma by dismissing them as depressive or paranoid epiphenomena. Fourth, Dr Haghighat claims our instrument has no validity. In fact, as we made clear in our paper, it is based firmly on the views and experiences of people with mental illness who were interviewed in depth in a previous study (Dinos et al. 2004) and thus it has greater validity than many scales used in the mental health field. Fifth, we do not understand Dr Haghighat’s reference to randomisation which has no role here. If he means random selection of people to participate then our method closely approximates to his wish in that potential participants were not selected on any predetermined basis. Naturally participation depends to some degree on participants’ abilities and personal inclinations but that is true whether selected randomly or not. Finally, participants in our earlier qualitative study emphasised that positive outcomes may arise from experiencing mental illness and thus such items were included in our scale. We reversed their scores to indicate that stigma might be greater when such positive aspects were lacking. This is not the same thing as assuming mental illness has only negative aspects. In parallel fashion the opposite of risk is not protection. It is lack of risk.

Dinos S, Stevens S, Serfaty M, Weich S, King M. Stigma: the feelings and experiences of 46 people with mental illness. Qualitative study. British Journal of Psychiatry 2004;184:176-181.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

From Perception to Reality, what are you measuring?

Rahman Haghighat, Independent Consultant Psychiatrist
24 April 2007

I would like to make the following comments on King et al (2007) stigma scale. The paperfrequently states that it is about a scale measuring “the stigma of mentalillness” but, in closescrutiny, it measures nothing other than perceived stigmatization by userssome in outpatient,in-patient, and crisis settings. There is no evidence this is an objectiveassessment ofstigmatization. Users’ perception of stigma is affected by their mental state, depression,persecutory delusions or hallucinations. These symptoms can help exaggerate participants’estimate of social stigmatization (including rejection and discrimination directed at them) andis by no means an accurate measure of it. Measurements of more objective perceptions ofstigmatization can only be done in users in remission.

The reported negative correlation between self-esteem and perceived stigma can beconfounded by high rates of both low self-esteem on the one hand (e.g., Axford & Jerrom,1986; Barrowclough et al, 2003; Blairy et al, 2004) and persecutory ideation and depressivecognition including ‘self-stigmatization’ on the other in people with mental illness. Indeed,low self-esteem is a common symptom in psychiatric conditions such as depressive disordersin which people can perceive more rejection and discrimination than warranted. Overemphasis on this correlation can divert attention from the fact that the correlation has to do more with people’s mental state than objective level of social stigmatization.

An instrument can only be called “standardized” if it attends to bothreliability and validity.The instrument is not validated so cannot be called standardized on the basis of a mere testretest reliability. The correlation between the ‘stigma scale’ and self-esteem scale is not an indication of validity of the instrument, and though the authors admit this (p 249, 2ndparagraph, p 253 1st paragraph), they end up referring to their instrumentas “standardized”and to the correlation as “concurrent validity”.

A wide range of people with diverging diagnoses and mental states have been recruited. There is no randomization and no exclusion criteria. Even the ‘perceived stigmatization’ cannot be attributed to a particular category of patients with a given diagnosis or at least to psychiatric users in general, due to lack of randomization and inclusion of arbitrary proportions of participants with different diagnoses. This is likely to cause problems in comparative studies. Also, stigma by definition excludes“positive aspects of mental illness”. This is indeed why the authors decided to reverse the scores of the ‘positive aspects of mental illness’ factor. For this reason, they should have also called the factor negative aspects of mental illness as a high score on this new factor then represents stigmatization and its negative influence on the person.

In brief, a scale measuring partly people’s mental state and partly objective social reality is neither valid nor standardizable as it cannot measure what is supposed to measure, i.e., satisfying the fundamental condition of validity.

Axford, S. & Jerrom, DW (1986) Self-esteem in Depression: a controlled repertory gridinvestigation. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 59 (1):61-8

Barrowclough C, Tarrier N, Humphreys L, et al (2003) Self-esteem in schizophrenia:relationships between self-evaluation, family attitudes, and symptomatology.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(1):92-9.

Blairy S, Linotte S, Souery D, et al (2004) Social adjustment and self-esteem of bipolarpatients: a multicentric study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 79(1-3):97-103

King, M, Dinos, S, & Shaw, J et al (2007) The Stigma Scale: the development of astandardized measure of the stigma of mental illness, British Journal of Psychiatry, 190: 248-254
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *