Skip to main content Accessibility help

Validity of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale

  • John T. Biggs (a1), Laurence T. Wylie (a1) and Vincent E. Ziegler (a1)


The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) correlated well (0·69) with the treating physician's global rating in 26 depressed out-patients during the six weeks of treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant. In a larger sample of 41 patients, a high correlation was found between the ZSDS and the Hamilton Rating Scale. The sensitivity of the ZSDS was found to be adequate. The scale was able to differentiate, at the 0·05 level, four severity groups classified on the basis of the global rating. The importance of the direct relationship between the range of severity studied and the value of the correlation coefficient was discussed. Previous investigations and the results of this study indicate that the ZSDS is a valid and sensitive measure of clinical severity in depressed patients and support its continued use as a research instrument.



Hide All
Bailey, J. & Coppen, A. (1976) A comparison between the Hamilton Rating Scale and the Beck Inventory in the measurement of depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 486–9.
Bech, P., Gram, L. F., Dein, E., Jacobsen, O., Vitger, J. & Bolwig, T. G. (1975) Quantitative rating of depression states. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 51, 51, 161–70.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 5363.
Brown, G. L. & Zung, W. W. K. (1972) Depression scales. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 13, 361–7.
Carroll, B. J., Fielding, J. M. & Blashki, M. B. (1973) Depression rating scales: a critical review. Archives of General Psychiatry, 28, 361–6.
Davies, B., Burrows, G. & Paynton, C. (1975) A comparative study of four depression rating scales. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 9, 21–4.
Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 5662.
Hamilton, M. (1976) Clinical evaluation of depression: clinical criteria and rating scales, including a Guttman scale. In Depression: Behavioral, Biochemical, Diagnostic and Treatment Concepts (eds Gallant, D. M. and Simpson, G. M.). New York: Spectrum Publications.
Kelley, T. L. (1947) Fundamentals of Statistics, pp 425–32. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
Prusoff, B. A., Klerman, G. L. & Paykel, E. S. (1972) Concordance between clinical assessments and patients' self-report in depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 546–52.
Siegel, S. (1956) Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ziegler, V. E., Co, B. T., Taylor, J. R., Clayton, P. J. & Biggs, J. T. (1976) Amitriptyline plasma levels and therapeutic response. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 19, 795801.
Zung, W. W. K. (1965) A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12, 6370.
Zung, W. W. K., Richards, C. B. & Short, M. J. (1965) Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic. Archives of General Psychiatry, 13, 508–15.
Zung, W. W. K. (1967) Factors influencing the self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 543–7.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Validity of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale

  • John T. Biggs (a1), Laurence T. Wylie (a1) and Vincent E. Ziegler (a1)
Submit a response


No eLetters have been published for this article.


Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *