Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T13:16:47.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy training for clinicians: an evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2011

Rachel Richards
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK
Joseph E. Oliver*
Affiliation:
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
Eric Morris
Affiliation:
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
Keith Aherne
Affiliation:
Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Partnership Trust
Alessandra C. Iervolino
Affiliation:
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
Janet Wingrove
Affiliation:
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation, London, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr J. E. Oliver, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, LEO Services, London SW9 7AA, UK. (email: joseph.oliver@slam.nhs.uk)

Abstract

The third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies has a developing evidence base and there is an increasing demand for specialist training. However, methods for training clinicians have not yet been evaluated in terms of effectiveness and usefulness. This evaluation seeks to assess: (1) the effectiveness of one-day introductory Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshops for clinicians in a NHS setting in terms of increasing knowledge of ACT; (2) the impact of experiential techniques as a method for delivering ACT training. A total of 73 participants took part in the workshops and completed questionnaires were administered pre-workshop and post-workshop; a further 29 participants completed follow-up questionnaire after 12 months. Participants demonstrated an increase in ACT knowledge, indicated that their interest had been stimulated, viewed the workshop positively and reported that their clinical work had been influenced by the workshop. In terms of the training process, experiential techniques are integral to ACT practice and training. Participants reported that their training experiences and engagement with the training group had not been aversive. Moreover, there was no evidence that participants’ own levels of experiential avoidance had affected training outcomes.

Information

Type
Education and supervision
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.