Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T00:51:56.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Courses for Horses’: designing, adapting and implementing self practice/self-reflection programmes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2019

Mark H. Freeston
Affiliation:
Newcastle Cognitive and Behavioural Therapies Centre, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Richard Thwaites*
Affiliation:
First Step, Cumbria Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK
James Bennett-Levy
Affiliation:
University Centre for Rural Health (North Coast), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: richard.thwaites@cumbria.nhs.uk

Abstract

Self-Practice/Self-Reflection (SP/SR) has been proposed both as an adjunct to therapy training programmes, and also as a means for therapist development among experienced therapists. Research suggests it develops aspects of knowledge and skill that may not be addressed through other training methods. With increasing interest in SP/SR, a growing evidence base regarding both participant benefits and potential risks from SP/SR, and the development of SP/SR programmes across a range of therapeutic modalities, we argue it is timely to identify a set of principles that can guide the design, adaptation and implementation of SP/SR programmes. At this stage, there is little empirical evidence to guide trainers wishing to implement SP/SR in different contexts. Accordingly, these principles have been derived from reflection on developing, testing and implementing SP/SR programmes as well as on other training and supervisory experience. The first set of principles detailed in Section 1 draw on various theories of learning and development and frame the processes involved, the next principles speak to the content of SP/SR programmes, and the final principles address structure. Within Section 2, the principles are then considered for their practical implications. In Section 3, the sharing of what are initially private self-reflections is then considered together with some implications for SP/SR programmes, especially when there is assessment involved. We argue that SP/SR will continue to progress with well-designed standard programmes, careful implementation, thoughtful adaptation, ongoing innovation, and especially more evaluation.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To understand the principles for designing, adapting and implementing SP/SR programmes that are drawn from theory and from the authors’ experience of developing and implementing SP/SR programmes over the last 20 years.

  2. (2) To understand the possible factors that guide the processes, content and structure of SP/SR programmes.

  3. (3) To understand how best to maximize effective engagement and learning (and limit harm) when planning or implementing an SP/SR programme.

Information

Type
Education and Supervision
Copyright
© British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.