Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Trainees' perception of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: 2-year survey

  • Akshya Vasudev (a1), Kamini Vasudev (a2) and Pratish Thakkar (a3)
Abstract
Aims and method

The Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) is a process of checking and evaluating evidence of competency attainment collected by a trainee over the preceding year. There has been no study evaluating trainees' perception of this new process. Two cross-sectional electronic surveys were conducted a year apart in the north of England. Out of 92 psychiatry trainees 58 (63%) completed the survey in 2008; 60 (63%) out of 96 trainees completed the second round in 2009.

Results

Over the year there was a significant improvement in trainees' perception of the new process: 75% of respondents highlighted non-availability of a list of acceptable evidence for the portfolio in 2008, which reduced to 22% in 2009 (P <0.001). The percentage of trainees facing difficulty in accessing the electronic portal reduced from 73 to 28% (P <0.001). The trainees continued to express the need for explicit feedback at ARCP and improved training of the assessors in addition to other parameters.

Clinical implications

The process of ARCP seems to have become robust over the year studied. There is scope for further refining of the process according to trainees' needs.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Trainees' perception of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: 2-year survey
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Trainees' perception of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: 2-year survey
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Trainees' perception of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: 2-year survey
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Akshya Vasudev (akshya.vasudev@ncl.ac.uk)
Footnotes
Hide All

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1 Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide 31. Med Teach 2007; 29: 855–71.
2 Scheele F, Teunissen P, Van Luijk S, Heineman E, Fluit L, Mulder H, et al. Introducing competency-based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach 2008; 30: 248–53.
3 Palmer EJ, Devitt PG. Limitations of student-driven formative assessment in a clinical clerkship. A randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ 2008; 11: 29.
4 Delamothe T. Modernising medical careers: final report. BMJ 2008; 336: 54–5.
5 Bache J, Brown J, Graham D. In-training assessment for specialist registrars: views of trainees and trainers in the Mersey Deanery. J R Soc Med 2002; 95: 612–3.
6 Department of Health, Department of Health, Social Services and Safety, NHS Scotland, NHS Wales. A Guide to Postgraduate Specialty Training in the UK. The Gold Guide. June 2007. First Edition. Modernising Medical Careers, 2007 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/Gold%20Guide%202007.pdf).
7 Wilkinson JR, Crossley JG, Wragg A, Mills P, Cowan G, Wade W. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom. Med Educ 2008; 42: 364–73.
8 Brittlebank A. Piloting workplace-based assessment in psychiatry. In Workplace-Based Assessments in Psychiatry (eds Bhugra D, Malik A, Brown N): 96108. Gaskell, 2007.
9 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Trainees' Guide to Workplace-Based Assessments. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2007 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/Trainees%20guide%20to%20WPBA%2031%2010%2007.doc).
10 Colbert CY, Ownby AR, Butler PM. A review of portfolio use in residency programs and considerations before implementation. Teach Learn Med 2008; 20: 340–5.
11 Royal College of Psychiatrists. Specialist Training in Psychiatry. A Comprehensive Guide to Training and Assessment in the UK for Trainees and Local Educational Providers. Occasional Paper OP69. Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2010 (http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdfversion/OP69x.pdf).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 1758-3209
  • EISSN: 1758-3217
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×