Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Web-STAR: A Visual Web-based IDE for a Story Comprehension System

  • CHRISTOS T. RODOSTHENOUS (a1) and LOIZOS MICHAEL (a2)
Abstract

We present Web-STAR, an online platform for story understanding built on top of the STAR reasoning engine for STory comprehension through ARgumentation. The platform includes a web-based integrated development environment, integration with the STAR system, and a web service infrastructure to support integration with other systems that rely on story understanding functionality to complete their tasks. The platform also delivers a number of “social” features, including a community repository for public story sharing with a built-in commenting system, and tools for collaborative story editing that can be used for team development projects and for educational purposes.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

The authors would like to thank: Adamos Koumis, for his collaboration in the development of the component that converts natural language to the STAR syntax; Elektra Kypridemou, for her help in the preparation of the evaluation methodology; and the anonymous reviewers, for their valuable comments and suggestions.

An earlier version of this work was presented at the 2nd International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Paradigms (IULP 2017). This article presents a newer version of the Web-STAR IDE with additional implemented features, along with the results of a user evaluation conducted to verify the usability and learnability of the IDE.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Abbott, H. P. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge University Press.
Balai, E., Gelfond, M. and Zhang, Y. 2013. Towards Answer Set Programming with Sorts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 135147.
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. and Miller, J. 2009. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies 4, 3, 114123.
Barnum, C. M. 2001. Usability Testing and Research, 1st ed. Allyn & Bacon, Inc., Needham Heights, MA, USA.
Baroni, P., Caminada, M. and Giacomin, M. 2011. An introduction to argumentation semantics. The Knowledge Engineering Review 26, 4, 365410.
Bench-Capon, T. and Dunne, P. E. 2007. Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 171, 10–15, 619641.
Besnard, P. and Hunter, A. 2008. Elements of Argumentation, vol. 47. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M. and Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the web. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’02. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 20–25 Apr. 2002, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 463470.
Bogaard, T., Wielemaker, J., Hollink, L. and Van Ossenbruggen, J. 2017. SWISH DataLab: A Web Interface for Data Exploration and Analysis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 181187.
Brandes, U., Eiglsperger, M., Lerner, J. and Pich, C. 2013. Graph Markup Language (GraphML). In Handbook of Graph Drawing Visualization, Tamassia, R., Ed. Discrete mathematics and its applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL [u.a.], 517541.
Brooke, J. 1996. SUS– A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189, 194, 47.
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T. and Gosling, S. D. 2011. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1, 35.
Carroll, N. 2001. On the narrative connection. In Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge University Press, 118133.
Charniak, E. 1972. Toward a Model of Children’s Story Comprehension. Tech. Rep. AITR-266, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Charniak, E. 1977. Ms. Maloprop, a language comprehension program. In Proc. of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1. IJCAI’77, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 22–25 Aug. 1977, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 17.
Cloud9 IDE. 2017. Cloud9 IDE. URL: http://c9.io/. [Accessed on April 18, 2017].
Codeanywhere Inc. 2017. Codeanywhere IDE. URL: https://codeanywhere.com/. [Accessed on April 18, 2017].
Corcoglioniti, F., Rospocher, M. and Palmero Aprosio, A. 2016. Frame-based ontology population with PIKES. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 28, 12, 32613275.
Dasseville, I. and Janssens, G. 2015. A web-based IDE for IDP. In 1st International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Programming (IULP2015).
Davis, E. 1990. Representations of Commonsense Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Denecker, M. and Ternovska, E. 2008. A logic of nonmonotone inductive definitions. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 9, 2 (Apr.), 14:114:52.
Diakidoy, I.-A., Kakas, A., Michael, L. and Miller, R. 2014. Story comprehension through argumentation. In Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014), Scottish Highlands, UK, 9–12 Sep. 2014, Parsons, S., Oren, N., Reed, C., and Cerutti, F., Eds. IOS Press, 3142.
Diakidoy, I.-A., Kakas, A., Michael, L. and Miller, R. 2015. STAR: A system of argumentation for story comprehension and beyond. In Working Notes of the 12th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Commonsense 2015), 6470.
Eason, K. D. 2005. Information Technology and Organisational Change. Taylor & Francis.
Eclipse Foundation. 2017. Eclipse Che IDE. URL: https://eclipse.org/che/. [Accessed on April 18, 2017].
Forster, E. M. 2010. Aspects of the Novel. RosettaBooks.
Franz, M., Lopes, C. T., Huck, G., Dong, Y., Sumer, O. and Bader, G. D. 2016. Cytoscape.js: A graph theory library for visualisation and analysis. Bioinformatics 32, 2, 309311.
Friedman, M. 1974. Explanation and scientific understanding. The Journal of Philosophy 71, 1, 519.
Genette, G. 1982. Figures of Literary Discourse. European perspectives: A series in social thought and cultural criticism. Columbia University Press.
Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C. and Broek, P. V. D. 1999. Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso. Taylor & Francis.
Hirschman, L., Light, M., Breck, E. and Burger, J. D. 1999. Deep read: A reading comprehension system. In Proc. of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Computational Linguistics, College Park, Maryland, USA, 20–26 Jun. 1999. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 325332.
ICEcoder Ltd. 2017. ICEcoder IDE. URL: https://icecoder.net/. [Accessed on April 18, 2017].
Iyyer, M., Manjunatha, V., Guha, A., Vyas, Y., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Daume, H. III and Davis, L. S. 2016. The amazing mysteries of the gutter: Drawing inferences between panels in comic book narratives. CoRR abs/1611.0.
John, B. E. and Packer, H. 1995. Learning and using the cognitive walkthrough method: A case study approach. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’95. Denver, Colorado, USA, 07–11 May, Katz, I. R., Mack, R., Marks, L., Rosson, M. B., and Nielsen, J., Eds. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 429436.
Johnston, A. B. and Burnett, D. C. 2012. WebRTC: APIs and RTCWEB Protocols of the HTML5 Real-Time Web. Digital Codex LLC, USA.
Kakas, A. and Michael, L. 2016. Cognitive systems: Argument and cognition. IEEE Intelligent Informatics Bulletin 17, 1, 1420.
Katz, B. 1997. Annotating the World Wide Web using natural language. In Computer-Assisted Information Searching on Internet. RIAO ’97. LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES D’INFORMATIQUE DOCUMENTAIRE, Paris, France, 136155.
Kline, R. B. and Seffah, A. 2005. Evaluation of integrated software development environments: Challenges and results from three empirical studies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63, 6 (Dec.), 607627.
Kowalski, R. and Sadri, F. 2016. Programming in logic without logic programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 16, 3 (May), 269295.
Lenat, D. 1995. CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38, 11, 3338.
Lenat, D. B. and Guha, R. V. 1990. Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project, 1st ed. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, USA.
Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S. and Maher, D. E. 2015. Measuring perceived usability: The SUS, UMUX-LITE, and AltUsability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31, 8, 496505.
Macefield, R. 2009. How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: A practitioner’s guide. Journal of Usability Studies 5, 1, 3445.
Mahdisoltani, F., Biega, J. and Suchanek, F. M. 2015. YAGO3: A knowledge base from multilingual wikipedias. In Proc. of 7th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR), Asilomar, California, USA, 4–7 Jan. 2015, www.cidrdb.org [Online proceedings], 111.
Manning, C. D., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., Surdeanu, M. and McClosky, D. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proc. of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 22–27 Jun. 2014, Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 5560.
Marcopoulos, E., Reotutar, C. and Zhang, Y. 2017. An online development environment for answer set programming. In 2nd International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Paradigms (IULP 2017).
Michael, L. 2009. Reading between the lines. In Proc. of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), Pasadena, California, USA, 11–17 Jul. 2009, IJCAI Organization, 15251530.
Michael, L. 2013. Story understanding... Calculemus. In Proc. of the 11th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (Commonsense’13), Ayia Napa, Cyprus, 27–29 May 2013, [online proceedings].
Michael, L. 2016. Cognitive reasoning and learning mechanisms. In 4th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition, vol. 1895, New York City, NY, USA, 6–16 Jul. 2016, Lieto, A., Bhatt, M., Oltramari, A., and Vernon, D., Eds. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org), 2–23.
Michael, L. 2017. The Advice Taker 2.0. In Proc. of the 13th International Symposium on Commonsense Reasoning (Commonsense 2017), vol. 2052. London, UK, 6–8 Nov. 2017, Gordon, A. S., Miller, R., and Turán, G., Eds. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org).
Mitchell, T., Cohen, W., Hruschka, E., Talukdar, P., Betteridge, J., Carlson, A., Mishra, B. D., Gardner, M., Kisiel, B., Krishnamurthy, J., Lao, N., Mazaitis, K., Mohamed, T., Nakashole, N., Platanios, E., Ritter, A., Samadi, M., Settles, B., Wang, R., Wijaya, D., Gupta, A., Chen, X., Saparov, A., Greaves, M. and Welling, J. 2015. Never-ending learning. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 23022310.
Modgil, S. and Prakken, H. 2014. The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: A tutorial. Argument & Computation 5, 1, 3162.
Morgan, M. S. 2017. Narrative ordering and explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 62, 8697.
Mueller, E. T. 2000. Prospects for in-depth story understanding by computer. Cognitive Systems Research 23, 307340.
Mueller, E. T. 2003. Story understanding through multi-representation model construction. In Proc. of the HLT-NAACL 2003 Workshop on Text Meaning, vol. 9. HLT-NAACL- TEXTMEANING. Edmonton, Canada, 31 May 2003, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 46–53.
Mueller, E. T. 2006. Story understanding. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Nadel, Lynn, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mueller, E. T. 2007. Modelling space and time in narratives about restaurants. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22, 1, 6784.
Mueller, E. T. 2015. Commonsense Reasoning: An Event Calculus Based Approach, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ng, H. T., Teo, L. H. and Kwan, J. L. P. 2000. A machine learning approach to answering questions for reading comprehension tests. In Proc. of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora: Held in Conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 13. EMNLP ’00. Hong Kong, 7–8 Oct. 2000, Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 124–132.
Pansanato, L., Rivolli, A. and Pereira, D. 2015. An evaluation with web developers of capturing user interaction with rich Internet applications for usability evaluation. International Journal of Computer Science and Application 4, 2, 5160.
Prince, G. 2003. A Dictionary of Narratology. University of Nebraska Press.
Rahwan, I. and Simari, G. R. 2009. Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Rick Altman. 2008. A Theory of Narrative. Columbia University Press.
Ricoeur, P. 1980. Narrative time. Critical Inquiry 7, 1, 169190.
Riloff, E. and Thelen, M. 2000. A rule-based question answering system for reading comprehension tests. In Proc. of the 2000 ANLP/NAACL Workshop on Reading Comprehension Tests As Evaluation for Computer-based Language Understanding Systems, vol. 6. ANLP/NAACL-ReadingComp ’00. Seattle, Washington, USA, 4 May 2000, Association for Computational Linguistics Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1319.
Rodosthenous, C. and Michael, L. 2016. A hybrid approach to commonsense knowledge acquisition. In Proc. of the 8th European Starting AI Researcher Symposium, The Hague, Holland, 29–30 Aug. 2016, Pearce, D., and Pinto, H. S., Eds. IOS Press, 111122.
Roth, P. A. 1989. How narratives explain. Social Research 56, 2, 449478.
Ryan, M.-L. 2007. Toward a definition of narrative. In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, Herman, D., Ed. Cambridge University Press, 2235.
Safranski, K. 2017. Codiad Web Based, Cloud IDE. URL: http://codiad.com/. [Accessed on April 18, 2017].
Speer, R. and Havasi, C. 2013. ConceptNet 5: A Large Semantic Network for Relational Knowledge. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 161176.
Toni, F. 2014. A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation. Argument & Computation 5, 1, 89117.
UzZaman, N., Llorens, H., Derczynski, L., Verhagen, M., Allen, J. and Pustejovsky, J. 2013. SemEval-2013 Task 1: TempEval-3: Evaluating time expressions, events, and temporal relations. In Second joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (* SEM) 2, SemEval, 19.
Velleman, J. D. 2003. Narrative explanation. The Philosophical Review 112, 1, 125.
von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. 2008. Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM 51, 8, 57.
Wellner, B., Ferro, L., Grieff, W. and Hirschman, L. 2006. Reading comprehension tests for computer-based understanding evaluation. Natural Language Engineering 12, 4 (Dec.), 305334.
Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C. and Polson, P. 1994. The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner’s Guide. Tech. rep., New York, NY, USA.
Wielemaker, J., Lager, T. and Riguzzi, F. 2015. SWISH: SWI-Prolog for sharing. In 1st International Workshop on User-Oriented Logic Programming (IULP2015).
Wielemaker, J., Schrijvers, T., Triska, M. and Lager, T. 2012. SWI-Prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 12, 1–2, 6796.
Winston, P. H. 2015. Model-based story summary. In 6th Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN 2015), Finlayson, M. A., Miller, B., Lieto, A., and Ronfard, R., Eds. OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), vol. 45. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 157–165.
Zhang, X., Zhao, J. and LeCun, Y. 2015. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, Cortes, C., Lawrence, N. D., Lee, D. D., Sugiyama, M., and Garnett, R., Eds. Curran Associates Inc., 649657.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • ISSN: 1471-0684
  • EISSN: 1475-3081
  • URL: /core/journals/theory-and-practice-of-logic-programming
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Rodosthenous and Michael supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (560 KB)
560 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed