Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:49:54.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SHOULD YOU BE AFRAID? ALONENESS SCEPTICISM AND DESCARTES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2018

Get access

Abstract

Philosophers routinely claim that sceptical arguments are not only intellectually but also emotionally confronting. When students first meet these arguments, though, no fear arises. This article presents aloneness scepticism: you never know that other people are not aiming to deceive you or at least not caring about being truthful. Imagine raising this possibility in a classroom by directing it at a single student. He or she should feel fear.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Luckily so, too: surely some university ethics rule would be at risk of being broken if such a situation was deliberately induced by a philosophy teacher, or if it was wilfully allowed by her to persist once it had arisen.

2 It could do so if, say, she is reading at night, honestly unsure of whether she is dreaming. But that is a rare case.

3 Thanks to Brent Madison for helpful comments on a draft of this article.