Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:08:30.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CUT TO THE CHEESE – REPLY TO SPIEGEL'S ‘WHY FLATULENCE IS FUNNY’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Steffen Steinert
Get access

Abstract

In number 35 of Think, James Spiegel presents reasons for why flatulence is funny. In this article I will address five issues that I find problematic in his account:

  1. (1) His claim that laughter always results from a pleasant psychological shift is false.

  2. (2) His argumentative move from what makes paradigm cases funny to what makes flatulence funny is unwarranted.

  3. (3) His notion of a psychological shift is not specific enough and lacks explanatory power.

  4. (4) The claim that funniness of flatulence involves superiority is doubtful.

  5. (5) His talk about ‘nervous energy’ is questionable and has implausible implications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 16 , Issue 45 , Spring 2017 , pp. 67 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergson, Henri (1914) Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Critchley, Simon (2002) On Humour (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Hurley, R. A., Dennett, D. C., and Adams, R. B. Jr (2011) Inside Jokes (Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press).Google Scholar
Morreall, John (2009) Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor (Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, Brian (2008) ‘A Distance Theory of Humour’, Think 6.17/18 (2008), 139–48.Google Scholar