Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T20:42:42.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grandfather’s Murder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2025

Brian Garrett*
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, ACT, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Is travel to the past possible or does it harbour some hidden contradiction? It seems that if time travel is possible, a man could travel back in time and kill his grandfather before his father was conceived. Yet this is impossible. This conundrum has become known as the Grandfather Paradox. Some philosophers have attempted to defuse the paradox, and yet others have argued that the standard resolution of the paradox is open to a charge of incoherence. I argue that this charge is ungrounded.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baron, S. and Colyvan, M. (2019) ‘The End of Mystery’, American Philosophical Quarterly 56: .10.2307/48570634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, R. (1934) Murder of My Aunt (London: Faber & Faber).Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1976) ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’, American Philosophical Quarterly 13: .Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Y. R. (2022) ‘Against the Standard Solution to the Grandfather Paradox’, Synthese 200: . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03543-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar