Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T15:11:51.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Misunderstanding Richard Dawkins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2009

Jeremy Stangroom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many people are upset by Richard Dawkins. Mary Midgley, in particular, has argued that Dawkins'‘crude, cheap, blurred genetics […] is the kingpin of his crude, cheap, blurred psychology. ’Dawkins is often also suspected of having sinister political motives, and of morally condoning selfish behaviour. Here, Jeremy Stangroom explains how he believes Midgley and others have systematically misunderstood Dawkins.

Type
Research Article
Information
Think , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Spring 2003 , pp. 87 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2003

References

Dawkins, R., ‘In Defence of Selfish Genes’, Philosophy, vol. 56, no. 218 (1981), pp. 556–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Midgley, M., ‘Gene Juggling’, Philosophy, vol. 54, no. 210 (1979), pp. 439–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midgley, M., ‘Social Genes and Social Darwinism’, Philosophy, vol. 58, no. 225, pp. 365–377.Google Scholar