No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
WHY THERE IS SOMETHING RATHER THAN NOTHING
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2016
Abstract
The answer to the question of why there is Something rather than Nothing is that there has to be Something and that Nothing is impossible. There cannot not be Something so there cannot be Nothing. The paper justifies this conclusion, while also explaining why we might believe there may be Nothing. In the course of this, the so-called subtraction-argument is shown to be inadequate and question-begging.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2016
References
Efird, David and Stoneham, Tom, ‘The Subtraction Argument for the Possibility of Free Mass.’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2010) Volume 80, Issue 1, 50–57.Google Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888, second edition, ed Nidditch, P. H., 1978).Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, Peter, ‘Why is there anything at all?’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 70, 95–110.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J., ‘Why is there anything at all?’ Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 70, 111–120.Google Scholar
Paseau, Alexander, ‘Why the substraction argument does not add up.’ Analysis (2002) 62 (1): 73–75.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo, ‘There might be nothing: the substraction argument improved.’ Analysis (1997) 57 (3), 159–166.Google Scholar
Rundle, Bede, Why there is Something rather than Nothing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Sorensen, Roy, ‘Nothingness’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness/Google Scholar