Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

What Drives Institutional Reforms in Regional Organisations? Diffusion, Contextual Conditions, and the Modular Design of ASEAN

  • Anja Jetschke (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

What drives institutional reforms in regional organisations? And what explains the institutional design of ASEAN? Despite many differences, conventional approaches to the institutional design of regional organisations more generally and ASEAN in particular are united in regarding them as either determined by factors endogenous to the region − such as varying state interests or collective norms − or as exogenously driven, most importantly by hegemonic states like the US or China. This article offers a diffusion account of ASEAN's institutional design. Building on a more recent strand in the diffusion literature emphasising that diffusion rarely leads to convergence, the article makes two genuine contributions. First, it argues that members of regional organisations engage in modular adoption: they select institutional templates from a variety of regional as well as international organisations thereby taking advantage of available information on the costs and benefits of alternative institutions. Second, it argues that contextual conditions and cognitive priors influence what templates are chosen. The argument will be illustrated with a case study on ASEAN's adoption of a single market and a dispute settlement mechanism. Finally, and contrary to arguments that institutional borrowing might increase the expectations-deliverance gap within regional organisations, it argues that if conducted consistently, modular adoption can lead to substantial innovation and success.

Copyright
References
Hide All
AcharyaAmitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, 1st Edition. London and New York: Routledge.
AcharyaAmitav. 2004. How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58(2), 239275.
AcharyaAmitav. 2009a. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order, 2nd Edition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Chapman & Hall.
AcharyaAmitav. 2009b. Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
AcharyaAmitav and JohnstonAlastair (eds.). 2007. Crafting Cooperation: The Design and Effect of Regional Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Agence France Presse. 1996. ASEAN to Sign Landmark Dispute Settlement Accord, 12 September.
APEC. 2004. Best Practice for RTAs/FTAs in APEC. 2004/AMM/003. Santiago, Chile: APEC.
ASEAN. 2007. ASEAN Economic Community Blueprint. Annex to the ASEAN Charter signed on November 20, 2007. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
ASEAN. 2009. The ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting with High Level Legal experts Group on follow up to the ASEAN Charter (HLEG). Cha-am, Thailand: ASEAN.
ASEAN Secretariat and UNCTAD. 2015. ASEAN Investment Report 2015. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat.
Asian Development Bank. 2010. Production Networks and Trade Patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or Globalization. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration 56. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
BaAlice. 2013. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: between internal and external legitimacy. In Zaum Dominik (ed.), Legitimating International Organizations, pp. 132161. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BaAlice. 2014. Institutional divergence and convergence in the Asia-Pacific? ASEAN in practice and in theory. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 27(2), 295318.
Bangkok Post. 2009. ASEAN Legal Experts Expect Dispute Settlement Mechanism by July, 28 February.
BeckNathaniel, Gleditsch Kristian Skrede and Beardsley Kyle. 2006. Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1), 2744.
BeckertJens. 2010. Institutional isomorphism revisited: convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociological Theory 28(2), 150166.
BeesonMark. 2013. Living with giants: ASEAN and the evolution of Asian regionalism. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 1(2), 303322.
BeesonMark and BreslinShaun. 2014. Regional and global forces in East Asia's economic engagement with international society. In Buzan Barry and Zhang Yongjin (eds.), Contesting International Society in East Asia, pp. 93118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BeesonMark and StoneDiane. 2013. The European Union model's influence in Asia after the global financial crisis. European Journal of East Asian Studies 12(2), 124.
BlaubergerMichael. 2012. With Luxembourg in mind … the remaking of national policies in the face of ECJ jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy 19(1), 109126.
BörzelTanja and RisseThomas. 2011. When Europeanisation meets diffusion: exploring new territory. West European Politics 35(1), 192207.
BraunDietmar and Fabrizio Gilardi. 2006. Taking Galton's problem seriously: towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3), 298322.
BurleyAnne-Marie and MattliWalter. 1993. Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration. International Organization 47(1), 4176.
Business World. 2007. Rules-based ASEAN Pushed (“… but analysts doubtful if European Union-style community will work”), 7 July.
Campagnolo, Diego and Camuffo, Arnaldo. 2009. The concept of modularity in management studies: a literature review. International Journal of Management Review 12(3), 259283.
CapanelliGiovanni, Lee Jong-Wha and Petri Peter. 2010. Economic interdependence in Asia: developing indicators for regional integration and cooperation. Singapore Economic Review 55(1), 125161.
ChaseClaude, Yanovich Alan, Crawford Jo-Ann and Ugaz Pamela. 2013. Mapping of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements – innovative or variations on a theme? In Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013–07. Geneva: WTO Economic Research and Statistics Division.
DeesStephane, di Mauro Filippo, Pesaran M. Hashem and Smith L. Vanessa. 2007. Exploring the international linkages of the euro area: a global VAR analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(1), 138.
DuinaFrancesco and LenzTobias. 2016. Regionalism and diffusion revisited: from final design towards stages of decision-making. Review of International Studies 42(4), 125.
DürkopColin. 2003. ASEAN decides on EU modelled Common Market. In KAS-Länderberichte: Konrad Adenauer Foundation.
ElkinsZachary and SimmonsBeth. 2005. On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598, 3351.
GarrettGeoffrey. 1995. The politics of legal integration in the European Union. International Organization 49(1), 171181.
GilardiFabrizio. 2010. Who learns from what in policy diffusion processes? American Journal of Political Science 54(3), 650666.
GilardiFabrizio. 2012. Transnational diffusion: norms, ideas, and policies. In Carlsnaes Walter, Risse Thomas and Simmons Beth (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, pp. 453477. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
HaftelYoram Z. and ThompsonAlexander. 2006. The independence of international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(2), 253275.
HaggardStephan. 2014. The liberal view of the international relations of Asia. In Pekkanen Saadia M., Ravenhill John and Foot Rosemary (eds.), Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, pp. 4563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HameiriShahar. 2013. Theorising regions through changes in statehood: rethinking the theory and method of comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies 39(2), 313335.
HameiriShahar and JayasuriyaKanishka. 2012. Regulatory regionalism in Asia. In Beeson Mark and Stubbs Richard (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, pp. 177185. Abingdon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
HicksRaymond and KimSoo Yeon. 2015. Does enforcement matter? Judicialization in PTAs and trade flows. World Trade Review 14(1), 83106.
HolzingerKatharina and KnillChristoph. 2005. Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12(5), 775796.
HoogheLiesbet and MarksGary. 2015. Delegation and pooling in international organizations. Review of International Organizations 10(3), 305328.
JetschkeAnja. 2009. Institutionalizing ASEAN: celebrating Europe through network governance. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(3), 407426.
JetschkeAnja and MurrayPhilomena. 2012. Diffusing regional integration: the EU and Southeast Asia. West European Politics 35(1), 174191.
JetschkeAnja, Theiner Patrick, Marggraf Claudia and Münch Sören. 2016. The Comparative Regional Organizations Project: Generating a New Data Set. University of Göttingen. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308886675_The_Comparative_Regional_Organizations_Project_Generating_a_New_Dataset.
KaplanJeffrey. 1996. ASEAN's rubicon: a dispute settlement mechanism for AFTA. Pacific Basin Law Journal 14(2), 147195.
KatzensteinPeter. 2005. A World of Regions. Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
KeohaneRobert. 1984. After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
KeohaneRobert and NyeJoseph. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.
KhongYuen Foong and NesaduraiHelen. 2007. Hanging together, institutional design and cooperation in Southeast Asia: AFTA and the ARF. In Acharya Amitav and Johnston Alastair (eds.), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, pp. 3282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KimSoo Yeon and HofmannTobias. 2010. Designing reciprocity: the politics of dispute settlement mechanisms in Asia's PTAs. Paper prepared for the workshop on “The Politics of Trade Agreements: Theory, Measurement and Empirical Applications”, the Niehaus Center for Globalizatio and Governance, Princeton University, 1 April 2010. Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~pcglobal/conferences/ptas/KH_pta_paper.pdf.
Klinger-VidraRobyn and SchleiferPhilip. 2014. Convergence more or less: why do practices vary as they diffuse? International Studies Review 16(2), 264274.
KoremenosBarbara. 2007. If only half of international agreements have dispute resolution provisions, which half needs explaining? The Journal of Legal Studies 36(1), 189212.
KrapohlSebastian and FinkSimon. 2012. Different paths of regional integration: trade networks and regional institution-building in Europe, Southeast Asia and Southern Africa. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(3), 472488.
LakeDavid A. 2007. Delegating divisible sovereignty: sweeping a conceptual minefield. Review of International Organizations 2(3), 219–37.
LeeChang Kil and StrangDavid. 2006. The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization 60(4), 883909.
LenzTobias. 2012. Spurred emulation: the EU and regional integration in Mercosur and SADC. West European Politics 35(1), 155173.
Levi-FaurDavid. 2005. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598(1), 1232.
MaggettiMartino and GilardiFabrizio. 2016. Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy 36(1), 87107.
MarceauGabrielle. 2007. The adoption of the ‘best practices’ for regional and free trade agreements in APEC: a road towards more WTO-consistent regional trade agreements? In Yasuhei Taniguchi, Yanovic Alan and Bohanes Jan (eds.), The WTO in the Twenty-First Century: Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia, pp. 409422. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MauroFilippo di, Dees Stephane and McKibbin Warwick (eds.). 2008. Globalisation, Regionalism and Economic Interdependence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MeyerJohn and RowanBrian. 1991. Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In Powell Walter and DiMaggio Paul (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 4162. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MilnerHelen and KubotaKeiko. 2005. Why the move to free trade? Democracy and trade policy in the developing countries. International Organization 59(1), 107143.
NairDeepak. 2016. A strong secretariat, a strong ASEAN? A re-evaluation. Perspective 8.
NaldiGino. 2014. The ASEAN protocol on dispute settlement mechanisms: an appraisal. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5(1), 134.
PlummerMichael G. 2006. The ASEAN Economic Community and the European experience. Paper presented at ASSA Meetings, AEA/ACAES Joint Session “European and Asian Integration: Trend and Monetary Issues”, Boston, 8 January 2006.
RadaelliClaudio M. 2005. Diffusion without convergence: how political context shapes the adoption of regulatory impact assessment. Journal of European Public Policy 12(5), 924943.
RavenhillJohn. 2008. Fighting irrelevance: an economic community ‘with ASEAN characteristics’. The Pacific Review 21(4), 469–88.
RavenhillJohn and EmmersRalf. 2010. The Asian and global financial crises: consequences for East Asian regionalism. In RSIS Working Paper No. 208. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore.
RisseThomas. 2016. The diffusion of regionalism. In Börzel Tanja and Risse Thomas (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism, pp. 87108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RülandJürgen and BechleKarsten. 2014. Defending state-centric regionalism through mimicry and localisation: regional parliamentary bodies in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Mercosur. Journal of International Relations and Development 17(1), 6188.
SimmonsBeth and ElkinsZachary. 2004. The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy. International Organization 98(1), 171189.
SmithJames McCall. 2000. The politics of dispute settlement design: explaining legalism in regional trade pacts. International Organization 54(1), 137180.
SolingenEtel. 2014. Comparative Regionalism: Economics and Security. New York: Routledge.
StubbsRichard. 2012. The development state and Asia regionalism. In Beeson Mark and Stubbs Richard (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism, pp. 9099. Abingdon, UK, and New York: Routledge.
TaySimon, Estanislao Jesus and Soesastro Hadi (eds.). 2001. Reinventing ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
ValenteThomas. 1999. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
WeiShang-Jin and FrankelJeffrey. 1998. Open regionalism in a world of continental trade blocks. IMF Staff Papers 45(3), 440453.
Xinhua News Agency. 1995. Thailand to Propose Setting Up an ASEAN Tribunal, 7 April.
Xinhua News Agency. 1996. ASEAN Protocol on Dispute Settlement Drafted, 23 August.
YamazawaIppei and UrataShujiro. 2000. Trade and investment liberalisation and facilitation. In Yamazawa Ippei (ed.), Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): Challenges and Tasks for the Twenty-first Century, pp. 5189. London and New York: Routledge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia
  • ISSN: 2051-364X
  • EISSN: 2051-3658
  • URL: /core/journals/trans-trans-regional-and-national-studies-of-southeast-asia
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 83 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 373 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th January 2017 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.