Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T10:54:28.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPES AND REGIMES OF MATERIALITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2018

William Whyte*
Affiliation:
AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHESTER

Abstract

Beginning with a surprisingly exuberant response to the landscape recorded by a distinguished scholar, this paper explores the agency of things and places though time. It argues that the recent ‘material turn’ is part of a broader re-enchantment of the world: a re-enchantment that has parallels with a similar process at the turn of the nineteenth century. Tracing this history suggests that within the space of a single generation the material world can be enchanted or disenchanted, with things and places imbued with – or stripped of –agency. In other words, different periods possess what we might call different regimes of materiality. Any approach which assumes the existence of material agency throughout history, or which imports our assumptions into a period which did not share them, will necessarily fail. Before we look at the material world, therefore, we need to examine how the material world was looked at, how it was conceptualised and how it was experienced. We need to apprehend its regime of materiality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

My sincere thanks to Jennifer Hillman, Tom Pickles and Katherine Wilson for the invitation to speak, and to the Royal Historical Society for its support. I have explored some of the ideas in this paper at conferences in Belfast, London and Oxford and am deeply grateful for the opportunity to develop them over a number of years. I must also thank Dan Hicks and Sim Koole for bibliographical suggestions, and – as always – acknowledge my debts to Zoë Waxman for her invaluable help and advice.

References

1 Stephen Halliwell, ‘Dover, Sir Kenneth James (1920–2010), Greek Scholar and College Head’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, www.oxforddnb.com/view/10.1093/ref:odnb/9780198614128.001.0001/odnb-9780198614128-e-102682, accessed 13 Apr. 2018; see also Russell, D. A. and Halliwell, F. S., ‘Dover, Kenneth James, 1920–2010’, Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, 11 (2012), 153–75Google Scholar.

2 Dover, Kenneth, Marginal Comment: A Memoir (1994), 114Google Scholar.

3 Human Sexuality: An Encyclopaedia, ed. Bullough, Vern and Bullough, Bonnie (New York and London, 2013), 54Google Scholar.

4 Bennett, Jane, Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Durham, NC, 2010), 61Google Scholar. In this, she follows the terminology coined by Mario Perniola.

5 Though it must be said his references to masturbation are somewhat reductive, see, e.g., Dover, Kenneth, Greek Homosexuality (Cambridge, MA, 1989), 148Google Scholar.

6 Lacqueur, Thomas, Solitary Sex: A Cultural History of Masturbation (New York, 2003)Google Scholar. On the silences surrounding the subject in history, see Stevenson, David, ‘Recording the Unspeakable: Masturbation in the Diary of William Drummond, 1657–1659’, Journal of the History of Sexuality, 9 (2000), 223–39Google Scholar.

7 For a useful introduction, see Isenberg, Andrew C., ‘Introduction: A New Environmental History’, in The Oxford Handbook of Environmental History, ed. Isenberg, Andrew C. (Oxford, 2014), 122Google Scholar.

8 Burke, Edmund, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and Beautiful (Oxford, 2015)Google Scholar, esp. 34, 47, 109–11. The sublimated sexuality of Burke's sublime is discussed in Sha, Richard C., Perverse Romanticism: Aesthetics and Sexuality in Britain, 1750–1832 (Baltimore, 2009), 166–71Google Scholar. The extent to which a ‘sexual element’ is always found in the sublime is briskly summarised in Paglia, Camille, Sexual Personae: Art and Decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson (New Haven and London, 2011), 269Google Scholar.

9 Koerner, Joseph Leo, Caspar David Friedrich and the Subject of Landscape (2009), 212–13Google Scholar.

10 Hofmann, Werner, Caspar David Friedrich, trans. Whitall, Mary (2005), 22, 25Google Scholar.

11 See especially Harvey, Graham, Animism: Respecting the Living World (2017), 213–30Google Scholar.

12 Ingold, Tim, ‘Rethinking the Animate, Reanimating Thought’, Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 71 (2006) 920CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Mitchell, W. J. T., What Do Pictures Want? The Lives and Loves of Images (Chicago and London, 2005)Google Scholar.

14 Gosden, Chris, ‘What Do Objects Want?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12 (2005), 193211CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 194.

15 Bennett, Jane, The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics (Princeton, 2011), 92Google Scholar.

16 Bennett, Vibrant Matter, 20.

17 Ingold, Tim, The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling, and Skill (new edn, London and New York, 2011)Google Scholar.

18 Landscape and Power, ed. Mitchell, W. J. T., 2nd edn (Chicago and London, 2002)Google Scholar.

19 Quoted in Coole, Diana, ‘The Inertia of Matter and the Generality of Flesh’, in New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, ed. Coole, Diana and Frost, Samantha (Durham, NC, and London, 2010), 92115CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 104. Compare this to the assertion on p. 20 of the introduction that this is a ‘posthumanist’ study.

20 Shroeder, Ralph, ‘Disenchantment and its Discontents: Weberian Perspectives on Science and Technology’, Sociological Review, 43 (1995), 227–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 228. See also Jenkins, Richard, ‘Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re–Enchantment: Max Weber at the Millennium’, Max Weber Studies, 1 (2000), 1132Google Scholar.

21 Chadwick, Owen, The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge, 1975)Google Scholar.

22 Wilson, Bryan, Religion in Secular Society (Harmondsworth, 1969)Google Scholar.

23 Thomas, Keith, Man and the Natural World (1983), 90Google Scholar.

24 Walsham, Alexandra, The Reformation of the Landscape: Religion, Identity, and Memory in Early Modern Britain and Ireland (Oxford, 2011), 567CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Hicks, Dan, ‘The Material Cultural Turn: Event and Effect’, in The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, ed. Hicks, Dan and Beaudry, Mary (Oxford, 2010), 2599Google Scholar.

26 Esposito, Roberto, Persons and Things, trans. Hanafi, Zakiya (Cambridge, 2015), 9Google Scholar.

27 Byatt, A. S., The Biographer's Tale (2001), 12Google Scholar.

28 Casey, Edward S., Getting Back into Place: Towards a Renewed Understanding of the Place-World, 2nd edn (Bloomington and Indianapolis, 2009)Google Scholar; Christopher Y. Tilley, A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments (1994).

29 Tilley is, for example, cited in Walsham, Reformation of the Landscape, 6. Casey has proved influential in the work of historians like Gittos, Helen, Liturgy, Architecture, and Sacred Places in Anglo-Saxon England (Oxford, 2015), 277Google Scholar.

30 Serres, Michel, The Five Senses: A Philosophy of Mingled Bodies, trans. Sankey, Margaret and Cowley, Peter (2016), 51Google Scholar.

31 Bennett, Vibrant Matter, ix.

32 Barad, Karen, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC, and London, 2007), 396CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 The changing atmosphere is wonderfully summed up in the work of the sociologist Steve Bruce – from God is Dead: Secularization in the West (2002) to Secularization: In Defence of an Unfashionable Theory (Oxford, 2011).

34 See, for instance, Fergusson, James, Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt (Berkeley, 1999)Google Scholar. I explore some of these themes in Whyte, William, ‘Modernism, Modernisation, and Europeanisation in West African Architecture, 1944–1994’, in Europeanization in the Twentieth Century: Historical Approaches, ed. Conway, Martin and Patel, Kiran Klaus (Basingstoke, 2010), 210–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton and Oxford, 2000), 240–3Google Scholar.

36 Latour, Bruno, On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods (Durham, NC, 2010), 61Google Scholar.

37 Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Porter, Catherine (Cambridge, MA, 1993)Google Scholar; idem, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, trans. Porter, Catherine (Cambridge, 2017)Google Scholar.

38 See especially Casey, Edward, The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History (Berkeley, 1997)Google Scholar. For Kant, for instance, the sublime and sexual experience detailed by Kenneth Dover would be simply the consequence of a – somewhat disordered – mental process. ‘Sublimity’, he observes, ‘does not reside in any of the things of nature, but only in our own mind’: Kant, Immanual, The Critique of Judgement, trans. Meredith, James Creed (Oxford, 1952), 114Google Scholar.

39 Shaw, Jane, Miracles in Enlightenment England (New Haven and London, 2006)Google Scholar; Iliffe, Rob, Priest of Nature: The Religious Worlds of Isaac Newton (Oxford, 2017)Google Scholar.

40 Monod, Paul Kléber, Solomon's Secret Arts: The Occult in the Age of Enlightenment (New Haven and London, 2013), 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Jay, Martin, Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought (Berkeley, 1994), 105Google Scholar.

42 Quoted in Crook, J. Mordaunt, The Dilemma of Style: Architectural Ideas from the Picturesque to the Post-Modern (1987), 21Google Scholar.

43 See also Crary, Jonathan, ‘Modernizing Vision’, in Vision and Visuality, ed. Foster, Hal (Seattle, 1988), 2950Google Scholar, at 33.

44 Shields, Conal, ‘Introduction’, to Landscape in Britain, c. 1750–1850, ed. Parris, Leslie (Exhibition Catalogue, London, 1973), 913Google Scholar, at 9.

45 Daniels, Stephen, Humphry Repton: Landscape Gardening and the Geography of Georgian England (New Haven and London, 1999), 48Google Scholar.

46 Quoted in David Watkin, The English Vision: The Picturesque in Architecture, Landscape, and Garden Design (1982), viii.

47 Quoted in Crook, Dilemma of Style, 31.

48 Ibid., 26.

49 Kieckhefer, Richard, Theology in Stone: Church Architecture from Byzantium to Berkeley (New York, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Carruthers, Mary, The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200 (Cambridge, 1999), 263Google Scholar.

51 Upton, Dell, Holy Things and Profane: Anglican Parish Churches in Colonial Virginia (New Haven and London, 1997), 228–9Google Scholar.

52 Nelson, Louis P., The Beauty of Holiness: Anglicanism and Architecture in Colonial South Carolina (Chapel Hill, NC, 2008)Google Scholar.

53 Harvey, John, Image of the Invisible: The Visualization of Religion in the Welsh Nonconformist Tradition (Cardiff, 1999)Google Scholar.

54 See Whyte, William, Unlocking the Church: The Lost Secrets of Victorian Sacred Space (Oxford, 2017)Google Scholar. For a shorter essay with a broader perspective, see Whyte, William, ‘Architecture’, in The Oxford Handbook of Nineteenth-Century Christian Thought, ed. Rasmussen, Joel, Wolfe, Judith and Zachhuber, Johannes (Oxford, 2017), 471–84Google Scholar.

55 Toews, John, Becoming Historical: Cultural Reformation and Public Memory in Early Nineteenth-Century Berlin (Cambridge, 2004), 129Google Scholar.

56 See also Hersey, G. L., High Victorian Gothic: A Study in Associationism (Baltimore, 1972)Google Scholar.

57 Thring, Edward, quoted in Whyte, William, ‘Building a Public School Community, 1860–1910’, History of Education, 32 (2003), 601–26Google Scholar, at 619.

58 I explore this further in William Whyte, ‘Architecture’, in Carolyn White, A Cultural History of Objects in the Age of Industry (forthcoming).

59 Joyce, Patrick, The State of Freedom: A Social History of the British State since 1800 (Cambridge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. ch. 7.

60 The following sentences draw heavily on Whyte, William, ‘Octavia Hill: The Practice of Sympathy and the Art of Housing’, in ‘Nobler Imaginings and Mightier Struggles’: Octavia Hill and the Remaking of British Society, ed. Baigent, Elizabeth and Cowell, Ben (2016), 4764Google Scholar.

61 Livesey, R., ‘Women Rent Collectors and the Rewriting of Space, Class, and Gender in East London, 1870–1900’, in Women and the Making of Built Space, ed. Darling, Elizabeth and Whitworth, Lesley (Aldershot, 2007), 87106Google Scholar, at 94.

62 Maurice, C. Edmund, The Life of Octavia Hill as Told in her Letters (1913), 193Google Scholar. Quoted in Whyte, ‘Octavia Hill’.

63 Hicks, ‘The Material Cultural Turn’, 96.

64 Otter, Chris, ‘The Technosphere: A New Concept for Urban Studies’, Urban History, 44 (2017), 145–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 147.

65 Ingold, Tim, Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art, and Architecture (New York and London, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Hodder, Ian, Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things (Chichester, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 Ibid., 29.

68 For a rather more enthusiastic account of phenomenology – when combined with documentary research – see Whyte, Nicola, ‘Senses of Place, Senses of Time: Landscape History from a British Perspective’, Landscape Research, 40 (2015), 925–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Gosden, ‘What Do Objects Want?’, 209.

70 Miller, Daniel, The Comfort of Things (Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar.

71 Reddy, William M., The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions (Cambridge, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

72 W. J. T. Mitchell, ‘Introduction’, to Landscape and Power, ed. Mitchell, 1–4, at 1.