Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-09T06:10:16.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Origins of the Gothic Revival: A Reappraisal(The Alexander Prize Essay)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Giles Worsley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the past 40 years the dominant influence over architecturalhistory, and in particular over stylistic analysis, has been theModern Movement. Sometimes deliberately, sometimes unconsciously,architectural history has been seen through the teleologicalspectacles of the Modernists who viewed architecture as aprogressive force leading inevitably towards the ultimate triumph ofModernism. At its most obvious this can be seen in studies oflate-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century architecture whichconcentrated on those strands that could be said to have been theprecursors of Modernism, while ignoring powerful contemporaryfactors which do not fit in with the Modernist thesis, like thestrength of Classical architecture in the 1930s. But even whendiscussing earlier periods the same basic assumption has prevailed,that architectural style should be seen as progressive. Thus whatbecame important was identifying new fashions and tracing theprecedents. As architectural style always moved on, anything thatwas not innovative or seemed to be regressive was assumed to be oldfashioned and the result of ignorance or lack of skill, andconsequently of little interest. With die collapse of Modernism, orat least of the assumption that Modernism is the only acceptable wayin which to build, and with the revival of older styles which 10years ago were thought to be dead and buried, this teleologicalapproach to architectural history needs revision. The study ofGothic Revival architecture in England is one area that isrevolutionised by the removal of Modernist assumptions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 3 , December 1993 , pp. 105 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 The standard account of British architectural history of this period remains Architecture in Britain 1530–1830 by Sir John Summerson, first published in 1953 but extensively revised since. The most recent study of the Gothic Revival is The Origins of the Gothic Revival by McCarthy, Michael (1987)Google Scholar. This sets out to shift attention away from Horace Walpole but in the end concentrates primarily on Walpole and his circle.

2 Quoted by Girouard, Mark, ‘Elizabethan Architecture and the Gothic Tradition’, Architectural History, VI (1963), 30Google Scholar. Figures referred to in the text are printed after the text, beginning on page 122. Copyright in these illustrations belongs to Country Life.

3 Girouard, Mark, Robert Smythson and the Elizabethan Country House, 1983, 30–35Google Scholar.

4 Worsley, Giles, ‘Snape Castle, Yorkshire,’ Country Life, 6 03 1986Google Scholar.

5 Girouard, Mark, ‘Wardour Castle, Wiltshire–I’, Country Life, 14 02 1991Google Scholar.

6 Evelyn, John, An Account of Architects and Architecture, 1723, 9Google Scholar.

7 Wotton, Henry, The Elements of Architecture, 1624, 51Google Scholar.

8 Sherwood, Jennifer and Pevsner, Nikolaus, The Buildings of England, Oxfordshire, 1974, 35Google Scholar.

9 Colvin, Howard, Unbuilt Oxford, 1983, 10–12Google Scholar.

10 Charlton, John, ‘The Lady Anne Clifford (1590–1676)’ Ancient Monuments and their Interpretation, ed. Apted, M. R. et al. , 1977, 303–14Google Scholar; Cocke, Thomas, ‘Repairer of the Breach’, Country Life, 25 10 1990Google Scholar.

11 Dictionary of the National Biography, XVIII, 137–38.

12 Haslam, Richard, ‘Lambeth Palace, London–II’, Country Life, 25 10 1990Google Scholar.

13 Pevsner, Nikolaus, The Buildings of England, County Durham, 1983, 195–99Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., 213–17; Binney, Marcus, ‘Durham Castle, Co. Durham’, Country Life, 28 09 1991Google Scholar.

15 Cornforth, John, ‘Auckland Castle, Co. Durham I and II’, Country Life, 27 12 and 3 Feb. 1972Google Scholar.

16 Worsley, Giles, ‘Bishopthorpe Palace, York’, Country Life, 18 07 1991Google Scholar.

17 Victoria County History, Stafford XIV, 1990, 52Google Scholar.

18 This mixed style was not confined to England. An interesting parallel can be found in contemporary Italian projects for completing the facades of Gothic churches, as in the designs of Girolamo Rainaldi for S. Petronio, Bologna (1626), and those of Francesco Castelli and Carlo Buzzi for the Duomo in Milana of 1648 and 1653. (Wittkower, Rudolf, Gothic vs Classic, New York, 1974, figs. 60–67, III.Google Scholar) John Onians also sheds valuable light on the use of combined Classical and Gothic schemes in Renaissance Italy in Bearers of Meaning, Cambridge, 1988Google Scholar.

19 It could be argued that the towers added to Westwood Park, Worcestershire, by Sir John Packington in the 10 years after the Civil War in a manner which accurately follows the form of the original design of about 1598 follows this inspiration. Packington like Shirley was a determined Royalist, and Westwood was the home of numerous High Church Anglicans during the Civil War.

20 Cornforth, John, ‘Drayton House, Northamptonshire–II’, Country Life, 20 05 1965Google Scholar.

21 Downes, Kerry, English Baroque Architecture, 1966, 16Google Scholar.

22 Cornforth, John, ‘Hampton Court, Herefordshire’, Country Life, 20 and 29 02 1973Google Scholar.

23 Mowl, Timothy and Earnshaw, Brian, ‘The Origins of 18th Century Neo-Medievalism in a Georgian Norman Castle’, Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, XL:4, D639, 12 1981, 289–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Rowan, Alistair, ‘Clearwell Castle, Gloucestershire’, in The Country Seat, ed. Colvin, H. M. and Harris, J., 1970, 145–49Google Scholar.

25 Wren Society, Oxford, 1928, V, 17.

26 Wren, Christopher, Parentalia, 1750, 302Google Scholar.

27 Quoted by Friedman, Terry, James Gibbs, 1984, 199–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Wren Society, Oxford, 1928, V, 17.

29 Explanation of Designs for All Souls by Nicholas Hawksmoor, Oxford, 1960, 5Google Scholar.

30 Summerson, John, Architecture in Britain 1530–1830, 1977, 396Google Scholar; McCarthy's, Michael The Origins of the Gothic Revival, 1987Google Scholar, ignores the Office of Works Gothic tradition.

31 Allan, Juliet, ‘New light on William Kent at Hampton Court Palace’, Architectural History, XXVII (1984), 52–3Google Scholar.

32 Harris, Eileen, British Architectural Books and Writers, Cambridge, 1990, 267Google Scholar.

33 Allen, 1984, 51.

34 Harris, John, ‘William Kent and Esher Place’, in The Fashioning and Functioning of the British Country House, ed. Jackson-Stops, Gervase, Hanover, , 1989, 14Google Scholar.

35 Harris, John, The Palladians, 1981, 82Google Scholar.

36 Downes, Kerry, Vanbrugh, 1977, 48Google Scholar.

37 The Correspondence of Horace Walpole, ed. Lewis, W. S., 1977, V35, 270–71Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., 183–84.

39 White, Roger, ‘Wiston House remodelled’, Architectural History, XXVII (1984), 241–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Godber, Joyce, ‘The Marchioness Grey of Wrest Park’, Publications of the Bedfordshire Historical Record Society, XLVII (1968), 138Google Scholar.

41 Hoare's Bank S 446.

42 Cartwright, J.J. (ed.), ‘The Travels through England of Dr Richard Pococke’, Camden Society, CXXXI (1888), 62Google Scholar.

43 Worsley, Giles, ‘Alnwick Castle, Northumberland–II’ Country Life, 8 12 1988Google Scholar.

44 Lewis, W. S., The Correspondence of Horace Walpole, 1960, 119Google Scholar.

45 McCarthy, 1987, 116.

46 Walpole Society XX, 127.

47 Gentleman's Magazine 1739, 641. Quoted by Frankl, Paul, The Gothic: literary Sources and Interpretations through Eight Centuries, Princeton, 1960, 381Google Scholar.

48 Quoted in Friedman, 1984, 197.

49 Ibid..