Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:29:55.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fetal Programming and the Leningrad Siege Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Sara A. Stanner*
Affiliation:
British Nutrition Foundation, London. s.stanner@nutrition.org.uk
John S. Yudkin
Affiliation:
International Health and Medical Education Centre, University College London.
*
*Address for correspondence: Sara Stanner, British Nutrition Foundation, High Holborn House, 52–54 High Holborn, London WC1V 6RQ, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Leningrad Siege Study investigated the relationship between decreased maternal food intake and risk factors for coronary heart disease in adult life. The study screened 169 subjects exposed to intrauterine starvation during the Siege of Leningrad (now St Petersburg) 1941–4, 192 subjects born in Leningrad before the siege and 188 subjects born concurrently with these two groups but outside the area of the siege. No difference was found between the subjects exposed to starvation in utero and during infancy in glucose tolerance [in utero: 5.2 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 5.1 to 5.3; infancy: 5.3 (5.1 to 5.5), p = 0.94], insulin concentration, blood pressure, lipid concentration or coagulation factors. The intrauterine exposed group had evidence of endothelial dysfunction by higher concentrations of von Willebrand factor and a stronger interaction between adult obesity and blood pressure. Non-systematic differences in subscapular to triceps skinfold ratio, diastolic blood pressure and clotting factors were demonstrated compared to the non-exposed groups. In conclusion, this study did not find an association between intrauterine starvation and glucose intolerance, dyslipidaemia, hypertension or cardiovascular disease in adult life. These findings differ from studies of subjects exposed to maternal starvation during the Dutch Hunger Winter. However, the dissimilar effects of exposure to the two famines may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of the ‘thrifty phenotype’ and support the importance of catch-up growth during early childhood, a situation that occurred in the Netherlands but not in Leningrad.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001