Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:26:09.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Self-Concept in Female Preadolescent Twins: Comparison of Minnesota and Seoul Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Yoon-Mi Hur*
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. ymhur@neuroimage.snu.ac.kr
*
*Address for correspondence: Yoon-Mi Hur, Neuroscience Research Institute, Medical Research Center (#205), Seoul National University, College of Medicine, 28 Yeongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, South Korea.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been argued that culture significantly influences the developmental basis of self-concept. The goal of the present study is to compare the relative importance of genetic and environmental factors to explain individual differences in various dimensions of self-concept in female preadoles- cents of Minnesota in the United States and Seoul in South Korea. Two hundred and eighteen monozygotic (MZ) and 137 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs from the Minnesota Twin Family Study (MTFS) and 74 MZ and 42 DZ twin pairs from the Seoul Twin Family Study (STFS) completed the 6 cluster scales of the Piers–Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale (P–H). The 6 cluster scales of the P-H include Popularity, Physical Appearance and Attributes, Behavior, Intellectual Competence and School Status, Anxiety, and Happiness and Satisfaction. Univariate model- fitting analyses were performed. In both samples, a model incorporating shared and nonshared environmental influences fitted the data best for Popularity, Anxiety, and Intellectual Competence and School Status, whereas a model including additive genetic and nonshared environmental factors provided the best fit for Physical Appearance and Attributes, and Behavior. The univariate model did not yield an adequate fit for Happiness and Satisfaction. For Physical Appearance and Attributes, and Intellectual Competence and School Status, estimates of additive genetic and environmental factors were significantly different between the MTFS and the STFS samples. For Popularity, Anxiety, and Behavior, however, the genetic and environmental estimates were comparable between the two samples.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005