Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:40:37.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vigorous Exercise in South Korean Adolescent and Young Adult Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2021

Yoon-Mi Hur*
Affiliation:
General College of Education, Kookmin University, Seoul, South Korea
*
Author for correspondence: Yoon-Mi Hur, Email: ymhur@kookmin.ac.kr

Abstract

Twin studies of physical exercise for Asian twins are sparse. This study aimed to examine genetic and environmental influences on frequency of vigorous exercise (FVE) in South Korean twins, with a special emphasis on sex effects. Telephone interviews on FVE were administered to 1757 twins (mean age = 19.05 years, SD = 3.01 years). Tetrachoric correlations were significantly different between monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins in males (.40 vs. .12), but they were similar in females (.44 vs. .45), suggesting the importance of genetic factors in FVE in males and that of common environmental factors in females. A scalar sex-limitation model incorporating age as a modifier was applied to data. The results revealed that genetic, common and individual environmental influences did not vary significantly with age, but differed across two sexes, confirming twin correlational analyses. In the best-fitting model, additive genetic and individual environmental influences on FVE were, respectively, .35 (95% CI [.26, .39]) and .65 (95% CI [.61, .74]) in males, and common and individual environmental influences were, respectively, .45 (95% CI [.35, .53]) and .55 (95% CI [.47, .65]) in females. These results contrasted starkly with recent findings from a large sample of Chinese adult twins (age >18 years), in which most variance (≥95%) of vigorous physical activity was attributable to common environmental influences in both sexes. Replications in other Asian samples are clearly needed.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University

The beneficial effects of physical exercise on health and quality of life are well documented. For example, a higher level of physical exercise is associated with a lower risk of developing obesity (Hills et al., Reference Hills, Andersen and Byrne2011), cardiovascular disease (Wannamethee & Shaper, Reference Wannamethee and Shaper2001), type 2 diabetes (Aune et al., Reference Aune, Norat, Leitzmann, Tonstad and Vatten2015), mental health problems (Grasdalsmoen et al., Reference Grasdalsmoen, Eriksen, Lønning and Sivertsen2020) and various cancers (Brown et al., Reference Brown, Winters-Stone, Lee and Schmitz2012). Additionally, physical exercise has positive effects on psychological wellbeing (Bartels et al., Reference Bartels, de Moor, van der Aa, Boomsma and de Geus2012), academic performance in adolescents and young adults (Aaltonen et al., Reference Aaltonen, Latvala, Jelenkovic, Rose, Kujala, Kaprio and Aaltonen2020) and cognition in the elderly (Iso-Markku et al., Reference Iso-Markku, Waller, Vuoksimaa, Vähä-Ypyä, Lindgren, Heikkilä and Kujala2018). Despite these well-known benefits of physical exercise, during the past decades, the prevalence of insufficient physical activity has increased worldwide (Guthold et al., Reference Guthold, Stevens, Riley and Bull2018). Thus, it is important to investigate determinants of individual differences in exercise behavior in various populations for development of optimal exercise intervention strategies and policy guidelines for global health promotion.

Previous twin studies have shown that genetic factors influence exercise behavior, even though the estimates of genetic influences have varied substantially by measure, age and sex (de Geus et al., Reference de Geus, Bartels, Kaprio, Lightfoot and Thomis2014). In Dutch twin studies of physical exercise (de Moor et al., Reference de Moor, Willemsen, Rebollo-Mesa, Stubbe, de Geus and Boomsma2011; van der Aa et al., Reference van der Aa, de Geus, van Beijsterveldt, Boomsma and Bartels2010; Vink et al., Reference Vink, Boomsma, Medland, de Moor, Stubbe, Cornes and de Geus2011), genetic influences were small in childhood (20%−40%) but increased from childhood to adolescence (38%−85%) and then decreased in adulthood (about 40%). In contrast, common environmental influences were substantial in childhood (50%−75%) but mostly nonsignificant afterward. Individual environmental influences were generally small during childhood and adolescence (<28%) but became increasingly large (about 60%) with age in adulthood. In a Finnish longitudinal twin study of physical exercise, Aaltonen et al. (Reference Aaltonen, Ortega-Alonso, Kujala and Kaprio2013) found that in both sexes the heritability of leisure-time physical activity remained significant (43% to 52%) during adolescence (16−18 years) but reduced to approximately 30% in young adulthood (about 24 years). In contrast, common environmental influences increased from adolescence (18% to 26%) to young adulthood (43% to 49%). Individual environmental influences remained relatively stable across adolescence and young adulthood, ranging from 20% to 30% in both sexes. The GenomeEUtwin project (Stubbe et al., Reference Stubbe, Boomsma, Vink, Cornes, Martin, Skytthe and de Geus2006; Vink et al., Reference Vink, Boomsma, Medland, de Moor, Stubbe, Cornes and de Geus2011), which pooled adult twin data from seven European countries (Australia, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norwey, Sweden and the UK), revealed that genetic influences on physical activity ranged from 48% to 71% across the countries (Stubbe et al., Reference Stubbe, Boomsma, Vink, Cornes, Martin, Skytthe and de Geus2006) and that heritability reduced from about 70% to 40% with increasing age from 19 to 50 years, whereas individual environmental influences increased from about 30% to 60% in four of the seven countries. With a few exceptions, common environmental influences were absent across the adulthood (Vink et al., Reference Vink, Boomsma, Medland, de Moor, Stubbe, Cornes and de Geus2011).

Sex differences in genetic and environmental influences on physical exercise were significant in some studies (e.g. Carlsson et al., Reference Carlsson, Andersson, Lichtenstein and Michaelsson2006; Maia et al., Reference Maia, Thomis and Beunen2002) but not in others (e.g. van der Aa et al., Reference van der Aa, de Geus, van Beijsterveldt, Boomsma and Bartels2010; Vink et al., Reference Vink, Boomsma, Medland, de Moor, Stubbe, Cornes and de Geus2011). Whenever significant differences were found, males tended to have higher genetic and lower common environmental influences than did females. For example, van der Aa et al. (Reference van der Aa, de Geus, van Beijsterveldt, Boomsma and Bartels2010) found that 85% and 38% of variability in leisure time physical activity at ages 13−14 years were explained by genetic factors for boys and girls, respectively, only in girls were 46% accounted for by common environmental influences. In another example, a Portuguese twin sample aged from 12 to 25 years showed that genetic influences were higher (63% vs. 32%), and common environmental influences were lower (0% vs. 38%) in males than in females, whereas individual environmental influences were roughly similar (37% vs. 30%) in two sexes (Maia et al., Reference Maia, Thomis and Beunen2002).

Genetic and environmental influences on physical activity in Asians remain poorly understood because most twin studies of exercise to date have investigated American and European samples. In a large sample of Chinese adult same-sex twins (age >18 years, N = 19,308), Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Gao, Lv, Yu, Wang, Pang and Li2016) found that individual difference in vigorous physical activity defined as 150 minutes of moderate or high-intensity physical activity per week was almost completely explained by common environmental influences in both sexes (95% in males, 98% in females) and that genetic influences were inconsequential (<3% in both sexes). These results sharply contrasted those found in most Western twin samples. Discrepancies in findings cannot be attributed to measurement differences because, like many Western twin studies, the Wang et al. study employed the questionnaire method. Differences in race/ethnic differences in physical fitness and exercise abilities might have contributed to the discrepancies in results. Thus, it is important to further explore genetic and environmental influences on physical activity in Asian samples which have genetic backgrounds similar to Chinese twins. If Asians are vastly different from Westerners in genetic and environmental etiologies of physical activity, then ethnically sensitive exercise intervention strategies and guidelines might be needed for effective health promotion. Thus, the present study investigated genetic and environmental influences on frequency of vigorous exercise (FVE) in South Korean adolescent and young adult twins, with a special emphasis on sex effects.

Methods

Sample

The total sample included 1757 adolescent and young adult twins (mean age = 19.05 years, SD = 3.01 years) identified from the South Korean Twin Registry (SKTR; Hur et al., Reference Hur, Kang, Jeong, Kang and Kim2019). The SKTR is a nationwide volunteer registry of South Korean preschooler to young adult twins and their families. Adolescent twins in the SKTR were collected from schools throughout South Korea, whereas young adult twins were from Facebook, twin clubs and colleges throughout South Korea. Various psychological assessments have been administered via telephone and mail surveys to twins registered with the SKTR. Zygosity of the twins in the SKTR was assessed through three items asking twins’ physical similarity and frequency of confusion by family members, close friends and strangers (Ooki et al., Reference Ooki, Yamada and Asaka1993).

The total sample consisted of 368 monozygotic male (MZM) twins (155 complete pairs and 58 twin individuals), 173 dizygotic male (DZM) twins (67 complete pairs and 39 twin individuals), 682 monozygotic female (MZF) twins (312 complete pairs and 58 twin individuals), 274 dizygotic female (DZF) twins (117 complete pairs and 40 twin individuals) and 260 opposite-sex dizygotic (OSDZ) twins (119 complete pairs and 22 twin individuals). Larger numbers of MZ than DZ twins likely reflected the twin birth rates in the South Korean population for the birth cohorts in the present study (Hur & Kwon, Reference Hur and Kwon2005; Hur & Song, Reference Hur and Song2009).

Measures

During the SKTR telephone interview, twins were asked how often they engaged in vigorous physical exercise. Interviewers explained ‘vigorous exercise’ as that intense enough to cause rapid breathing and/or sweating. There were four response categories (0 = no exercise, 1 = 1−2 times per week, 2 = 3−4 times per week 3 = 5 times or more per week). Interviewers also asked twins who chose the response category of 1 or higher if they exercised more or less than 30 minutes each time, and 83% reported that they exercised a minimum of 30 minutes or more. The remaining 17% reported that they exercised less than 30 minutes each time.

Statistical Analysis

Data analyses were conducted in the following steps. First, descriptive analyses examined relationships of FVE with sex, age and zygosity. As twins are not an independent sample, phenotypic analyses were performed using one randomly chosen member of each twin pair in descriptive analyses. Second, as a preliminary step examining genetic, common environmental and individual environmental influences on FVE, tetrachoric correlations with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each type of twins were computed. Finally, a scalar sex-limitation model extended to include age as a moderator was fitted to data to estimate genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences in FVE in males and females and to investigate whether these contributions change with age during adolescence and young adulthood.

Because FVE is an ordinal variable, a liability threshold model was used to analyze twin data. The basic assumption underlying the liability threshold model is that a latent continuous liability underlies the distribution of the ordinal variable. The liability is assumed to have standard normal distribution with a mean of zero and standard deviation of 1.0. To model the four categories of vigorous exercise in the present study, three thresholds were required. The thresholds, expressed in z values, are defined by the prevalence of the four distinct categories of vigorous exercise frequencies. Using the raw data, MZ and DZ twin tetrachoric correlations were computed. As MZ twins share 100% of their segregating genes, but DZ twins, on average, share only 50%, higher MZ than DZ twin correlation indicates the presence of additive genetic effects (i.e. the sum of the average effect of all alleles that influence a trait). On the other hand, DZ correlation higher than half the MZ correlation indicates the presence of common environmental effects (i.e. those environmental factors shared between the two members of a twin pair).

A path diagram of the scalar sex-limitation model incorporating the age moderator is shown in Figure 1. In the model, the total variance of FVE was divided into additive genetic (A), common environmental (C) and individual environmental effects (E; i.e. those environmental factors unique to each member of a twin pair and measurement error). Correlations for additive genetic effects for MZ and DZ twins were fixed at 1.0 and .5, respectively, for each sex, whereas common environmental effects were fixed at 1.0 for both MZ and DZ twins. Individual environmental effects were uncorrelated between the two members of a twin pair, regardless of zygosity. The moderator variable, age (M) was transformed to a z score separately for males and females, and the main effect of age (z score) was incorporated on the thresholds for males and females (µ + βmM, µ + βfM). In addition, the model allowed the standard paths, A, C and E on the FVE to vary as a function of age (z score) and sex. Thus, the phenotypic variance (Vp) for each sex in the full age-moderation model can be expressed as Vp = (a + βaM)2 + (c + βcM)2 + (e + βeM)2. In this equation, βa, βc and βe represent the magnitude of the moderating effects related to A, C and E, respectively. Quantitative sex differences were tested by allowing the magnitudes of A, C and E effects to differ between males and females. In addition, the correlation between common environmental effects in OSDZ twin pairs was allowed to be less than 1.0, enabling estimation of qualitative sex difference in common environmental effects (i.e. partly different common environments operate in males and females). To determine the best-fitting, most parsimonious model, various constraints were imposed on the full model, and the resulting nested models were compared with the full model by the log likelihood ratio test (LRT) and Akaike’s information criteria (AIC). LRT evaluates the difference in minus two times the log likelihood (-2LL) between the full model and its nested model, which is asymptotically distributed as χ2 with degrees of freedom (df) equal to the two model’s difference in the degrees of freedom. Models with fewer parameters are preferred if they do not cause a significant deterioration of fit. Furthermore, the model with lowest AIC was considered the best-fitting because lower AIC value indicates better balance between parsimony and goodness-of-fit (Akaike, Reference Akaike1987). Statistical software package, Mx (Neale et al., Reference Neale, Boker, Xie and Maes2003) was used to conduct twin tetrachoric correlation and model-fitting analysis.

Fig. 1. Additive genetic (A), common environmental (C) and individual environment and measurement error (E) effects on frequency of vigorous exercise (FVE) for opposite-sex dizygotic twin pairs. Subscripts m and f refer to male and female, respectively. r c, common environmental correlation; M, moderator (age); β, regression coefficient for M; µ, main effects of age on FVE.

Results

Descriptive Statistics

Sex differences in frequency of vigorous exercise

Figure 2 shows sex differences in FVE in the total sample. Pearson chi-square tests showed significant sex differences in the total sample (χ2 (3) = 119.7, p < .001), indicating that males engage in vigorous exercise more frequently than females. Post hoc tests showed that frequency of ‘no exercise’ was significantly (p < .05) higher in females than in males. In contrast, frequencies of the two highest categories (i.e. 3−4 times per week, 5 times per week or more) were significantly (p < .05) higher in males than in females. Frequencies of the modest exercise category (i.e. 1−2 times per week) did not differ significantly between the two sexes.

Fig. 2. Frequency of vigorous exercise per week in males (black) and females (gray) in the total sample.

ns, not significant.

The relationship between age and frequency of vigorous exercise

The relationship between age and FVE was modest but significant in both sexes. The correlations were −.12 (p < .01) in males and −.11 (p < .01) in females, suggesting that in both sex groups, twins exercise less with increasing age.

Frequency of vigorous exercise by zygosity

A Pearson chi-square test showed no significant difference between MZ and DZ twins (χ2 (3) = 2.3, p < .51), fulfilling the assumption for twin analysis. Frequencies for MZ and DZ twins were, respectively, 37% and 34% for the first response category (i.e. no exercise), 34% and 31% for the second response category (i.e. 1−2 times per week), 18% and 21% for the third response category (i.e. 3–4 times per week) and 12% and 14% for the final category (i.e. 5 times or more per week).

Twin Correlations

Figure 3 displays tetrachoric twin correlations and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the five zygosity groups. MZM twin correlation (r = .40, 95% CI [.22, .55]) was significant and greater than DZM twin correlation (r = .12, 95% CI [−.17, .38]), suggesting the presence of genetic influences on vigorous exercise in males. In contrast, the MZF correlation (r = .44, 95% CI [.32, .54]) was similar to the DZF correlation (r = .45, 95% CI [.27, .60]), suggesting the presence of common environmental influences. The OSDZ twin correlation (r = .12. 95% CI [−.09, .31]) was lower than the DZF correlation but higher than the DZM correlation. These patterns of twin correlations suggested that genetic influences were important for individual differences in vigorous exercise in males, whereas common environmental influences were significant in females. MZM and MZF twin correlations were much lower than unity, indicating that individual environmental influences are high in both males and females.

Fig. 3. Tetrachoric correlations (95% CI) for frequency of vigorous exercise per week for MZM (monozygotic male), DZM (dizygotic male), MZF (monozygotic female), DZF (dizygotic female) and OSDZ (opposite-sex dizygotic) twins.

Model Fitting

Table 1 presents results of model-fitting analysis. When thresholds were equated across the two sexes from the full model, a significant difference in chi-square occurred (χ2 (3) = 149.63, p = .00), confirming sex differences in FVE (model 2). In model 3, qualitative sex difference in common environmental influences was tested. But the resulting chi-square difference was nonsignificant (χ2 (1) = .11, p = .73). In model 4, dropping all age moderators from both sexes did not significantly deteriorate model fit (χ2 (7) = 10.34, p = .17), suggesting that additive genetic, common environmental and individual environmental variances of FVE do not significantly change with age during adolescence and young adulthood. In model 5, additive genetic and common and individual environmental variances were equated across two sexes, which significantly worsened model fit (χ2 (10) = 20.93, p = .02). These results suggested that males and females differed in magnitudes of additive genetic and common and individual environmental variances. In model 6, common environmental variances were removed from both sex groups, whereas in model 7, additive genetic variances were eliminated. In both models, marginally significant chi-square differences occurred (χ2(9) = 16.43, p = .05 for model 6; χ2(9) = 17.46, p = .04 for model 7). However, a clearly nonsignificant chi-square difference (χ2(9) = 11.86, p = .22) was found in model 8, in which common environmental influences were removed from males and additive genetic influences, from females. This suggested preference of model 8 over models 6 or 7. Indeed, among all models tested, model 8 had the lowest AIC value. Thus, model 8 was the best-fitting, most parsimonious according to LRT and AIC. In the best-fitting model (Figure 4), additive genetic and individual environmental influences were, respectively, .35 (95% CI [.26, .39]) and .65 (95% CI [.61, .74]) in males, and common and individual environmental influences were, respectively, .45 (95% CI [.35, .53]) and .55 (95% CI [.47, .65]).

Table 1. Results of model-fitting analysis for frequency of vigorous exercise per week

-2LL, -2 log likelihood; A, additive genetic influences; C, common environmental influences; E, individual environmental influences including measurement error. The best-fitting model is indicated in bold type.

Fig. 4. Additive genetic (A; black), common environmental (C; dark gray) and individual environmental influences including measurement error (E; light gray) on frequency of vigorous exercise per week in the best-fitting model for males and females.

95% confidence intervals are in parenthesis.

Discussion

Consistent with prior Western and South Korean singleton samples (e.g. Cho et al., Reference Cho, Lee and Kim2014; Sallis et al., Reference Sallis, Prochaska and Taylor2000), this study showed that the prevalence of vigorous exercise was higher in males than in females. This study further showed that sex difference was driven largely by differences in the extreme groups (i.e. the no exercise group and the two high exercise groups); the modest exercise group showed no significant sex difference. These findings suggest that intervention should focus on no exercisers and intensive exercisers to reduce the gender gap in physical activities.

The present study showed that FVE declined with age in both sexes, which was also in line with many previous studies (e.g. van der Aa et al., Reference van der Aa, de Geus, van Beijsterveldt, Boomsma and Bartels2010). South Korean adolescents are obliged to participate in 1−4 hours of physical education class at school per week, and the hours of compulsory physical education class are lower in higher grades than in lower grades. Thus, the present findings of age-related decline in FVE likely reflected the decrease of compulsory physical education at school with increasing age. In young adults, the transition from student to work life occurs, which may also increasingly constrain the time to engage in vigorous physical exercise.

The finding that genetic influences were higher and common environmental influences were lower in males than in females agreed with results of several previous twin studies based on Western samples (Carlsson et al., Reference Carlsson, Andersson, Lichtenstein and Michaelsson2006; Maia et al., Reference Maia, Thomis and Beunen2002; van der Aa et al., Reference van der Aa, de Geus, van Beijsterveldt, Boomsma and Bartels2010), but contrasted with results from the Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Gao, Lv, Yu, Wang, Pang and Li2016) study based on Chinese twins. The present study differed from the Wang et al. study in age of sample (12.42−29.42 years vs. 18 years or older) and number of thresholds (1 vs. 3) in the measure of vigorous physical exercise. To make the measure of this study more comparable to that in the Chinese twin study, the data were reanalyzed using a single threshold model (dichotomy) with a cut-point of FVE of five times or more per week, corresponding to about 150 minutes or more activity per week as in the Chinese twin study. The best-fitting model still showed significant genetic influences in males (49%) and significant common environmental influences (50%) in females with the remaining variances attributable to individual environmental influences including measurement error (51% in males, 50% in females) in both sexes. Age differences between the Chinese and the present sample might have contributed to the differing outcomes to some degree. However, further exploration of genetic and environmental etiologies of physical activity in Asians is necessary to draw a firm conclusion.

Previous research has suggested that personality traits (e.g. sensation-seeking) (Sallis et al., Reference Sallis, Prochaska and Taylor2000), self-efficacy (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Park, Lee, Kim and Park2018), affective response to exercise (Schutte et al., Reference Schutte, Nederend, Hudziak, Bartels and de Geus2017), physical fitness traits (e.g. muscle strength, muscle endurance and aerobic power) (Bauman et al., Reference Bauman, Reis, Sallis, Wells, Loos and Martin2012) are key factors in maintaining regular physical exercise. Because all of these traits have been shown to be highly heritable (e.g. Polderman et al., Reference Polderman, Benyamin, de Leeuw, Sullivan, van Bochoven, Visscher and Posthuma2015), genes influencing them might be involved in the genetic variation for physical exercise in males. To date, genome-wide association studies have found a few loci significantly associated with physical exercise, but effect sizes of the genetic variants found were small (Hara et al., Reference Hara, Hachiya, Sutoh, Matsuo, Nishida, Shimanoe and Wakai2018; Klimentidis et al., Reference Klimentidis, Raichlen, Bea, Garcia, Wineinger, Mandarino and Going2018; de Moor et al., Reference de Moor, Liu, Boomsma, Li, Hamilton, Hottenga, Levy, Liu, Pei and Posthuma2009). In the first genomewide association study (GWAS), de Moor et al. (Reference de Moor, Liu, Boomsma, Li, Hamilton, Hottenga, Levy, Liu, Pei and Posthuma2009) found significant associations of physical exercise with the PAPSS2 gene involved in skeletal development and arthrosis and the SGIP1 gene primarily expressed in the hypothalamus of the brain in Dutch and American samples. Subsequently, Klimentidis et al. (Reference Klimentidis, Raichlen, Bea, Garcia, Wineinger, Mandarino and Going2018) showed that habitual physical activity was significantly associated with higher Alzheimer’s risk gene (APOE) and CADM2 gene related to higher body mass index and risk-taking behavior. In a large Japanese sample, Hara et al. (Reference Hara, Hachiya, Sutoh, Matsuo, Nishida, Shimanoe and Wakai2018) found a novel association between an SNP in the NPSR1-DPY19L1 intergenic region on chromosome 7 and leisure-time exercise behavior.

In females, common environmental influences were more important than genetic influences, explaining about 45% of variation of FVE in the present sample. Genetic environmental influences may show up later in life in females. Common environmental influences include parental supports and role models, sibling physical activity, family socioeconomic status and neighborhood recreational environment and exercise facilities (e.g. parks and trails, community health center). A review of 108 studies on factors influencing adolescents’ physical activity levels suggested that parental support and help were the most consistently associated with adolescents’ physical activity levels (Sallis et al., Reference Sallis, Prochaska and Taylor2000). Parental support and help vary across families, which may constitute common environmental variance in FVE. Although boys tend to receive more parental support in exercise activities than girls (Beets et al., Reference Beets, Cardinal and Alderman2010; Gustafson & Rhodes, Reference Gustafson and Rhodes2006), the present findings suggest that parental support and help exert significant influence only on girls. In line with the present study, Sallies et al. (Reference Sallies, Alcaraz, Mckenzie and Hovell1999) have shown that the effect of parents on sports participation is greater for girls than for boys. In a similar vein, Hanson and Chen (Reference Hanson and Chen2007) suggest that males are physically more active while interacting with their peers, whereas females are more active in structured activities that are more likely to involve parental influence. In young adults, although parents’ direct influence might diminish, the level of a co-twin’s physical activity might be important for maintenance of exercise especially for females. Taken together, present findings suggest that family-based interventions might be more useful for increasing exercise in females than in males in adolescents and young adults.

The present study has several limitations that need to be addressed. First, the present study was based on cross-sectional twin data. Decreased physical activity with age might reflect an increase in exercise in younger birth cohorts rather than aging effects. However, a decline in physical activities with age has been confirmed in previous longitudinal studies (Aaltonen et al., Reference Aaltonen, Ortega-Alonso, Kujala and Kaprio2013; van Mechelen et al., Reference van Mechelen, Twisk, Post, Snel and Kemper2000). Second, as in most twin studies, the present study analyzed self-report data. Although regular exercise can be reliably measured by self-report in adolescents and adults (Stubbe et al., Reference Stubbe, Boomsma, Vink, Cornes, Martin, Skytthe and de Geus2006), future twin studies using Asian samples might consider replicating the present findings using objective measures, for instance, movement sensors in smartphones. Finally, the generalizability of the present findings is limited because the sample consisted only of South Korean adolescents and young adults.

To conclude, although genetic and common environmental influences on FVE did not vary with age, they differed across males and females in South Korean twins during adolescence and young adulthood. These results suggest that intervention strategies to promote physical activity should be sex-specific.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are given to twins who participated in the South Korean Twin Registry.

Financial support

This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (NRF-371-2011-1 B00047) and by the ‘Development of Health Prediction Technology based on Big Data’ (K18092) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT(MSIT) of Korea given to the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM).

References

Aaltonen, S., Latvala, A., Jelenkovic, A., Rose, R. J., Kujala, U. M., Kaprio, J., … Aaltonen, S. (2020). Physical activity and academic performance: Genetic and environmental associations. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 52, 381390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aaltonen, S., Ortega-Alonso, A., Kujala, U. M., & Kaprio, J. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on longitudinal changes in leisure-time physical activity from adolescence to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 535543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aune, D., Norat, T., Leitzmann, M., Tonstad, S., & Vatten, L. J. (2015). Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. European Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 529542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, M., de Moor, M. H., van der Aa, N., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2012). Regular exercise, subjective wellbeing, and internalizing problems in adolescence: Causality or genetic pleiotropy? Frontier Genetics, 3, 4.Google ScholarPubMed
Bauman, A. E., Reis, R. S., Sallis, J. F., Wells, J. C, Loos, R. J. F., & Martin, B. W. (2012). Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet, 380, 258271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beets, M. W., Cardinal, B. J., & Alderman, B. L. (2010). Parental social support and the physical activity-related behaviors of youth: A review. Health Education & Behavior, 37(5), 621644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. C., Winters-Stone, K., Lee, A., & Schmitz, K. H. (2012). Cancer, physical activity, and exercise. Comprehensive Physiology, 2, 27752809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S., Andersson, T., Lichtenstein, P., & Michaelsson, K. (2006). Genetic effects on physical activity: Results from the Swedish Twin Registry. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38, 13961401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, K. O., Lee, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Physical activity and sedentary behavior are independently associated with weight in Korean adolescents. Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 4, 4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Geus, E. J., Bartels, M., Kaprio, J., Lightfoot, J. T., & Thomis, M. (2014). Genetics of regular exercise and sedentary behaviors. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 17, 262271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Moor, M. H., Liu, Y. J., Boomsma, D. I., Li, J., Hamilton, J. J., Hottenga, J. J., Levy, S., Liu, X. G., Pei, Y. F., & Posthuma, D. (2009). Genome-wide association study of exercise behavior in Dutch and American adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41, 18871895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Moor, M. H. M., Willemsen, G., Rebollo-Mesa, I., Stubbe, J. H., de Geus, E. J. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2011). Exercise participation in adolescents and their parents: evidence for genetic and generation specific environmental effects. Behavior Genetics, 41, 211222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grasdalsmoen, M., Eriksen, H. R., Lønning, K. J., & Sivertsen, B. (2020). Physical exercise, mental health problems, and suicide attempts in university students. BMC Psychiatry, 20, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gustafson, S. L., & Rhodes, R. E. (2006). Parental correlates of physical activity in children and early adolescents. Sports Medicine, 36, 7997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2018). Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 19 million participants. Lancet Global Health, 6, e1077e1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, M. D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 263285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hara, M., Hachiya, T., Sutoh, Y., Matsuo, K., Nishida, Y., Shimanoe, C., … Wakai, K. (2018). Genome-wide association study of leisure-time exercise behavior in Japanese adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 50, 24332441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hills, A. P., Andersen, L. B., & Byrne, N. M. (2011). Physical activity and obesity in children. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45, 866870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y-M., Kang, M. C., Jeong, H-U., Kang, I. C., & Kim, J. W. (2019). The South Korean Twin Registry. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 22, 606608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y.-M., & Kwon, J. S. (2005). Changes in twinning rates in South Korea: 1981–2002. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 7679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hur, Y.-M., & Song, T. B. (2009). A recent rise in twin birth rates and demographic changes in mothers of twins in South Korea: 2003–2007. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 118122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iso-Markku, P., Waller, K., Vuoksimaa, E., Vähä-Ypyä, H., Lindgren, N., Heikkilä, K., … Kujala, U. M. (2018). Objectively measured physical activity profile and cognition in Finnish elderly twins. Alzheimers & Dementia, 4, 263271.Google ScholarPubMed
Klimentidis, Y. C., Raichlen, D. A., Bea, J., Garcia, D. O., Wineinger, N. E., Mandarino, L. J., … Going, S. B. (2018). Genome-wide association study of habitual physical activity in over 277,000 UK Biobank participants identifies multiple variants including CADM2 and APOE. International Journal of Obesity (Lond), 42, 11611176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. G., Park, S., Lee, S. H., Kim, H., & Park, J.-W. (2018). Social cognitive theory and physical activity among Korean male high-school students. American Journal of Men’s Health, 12, 973980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maia, J. A. R., Thomis, M., & Beunen, G. (2002). Genetic factors in physical activity levels: a twin study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 8791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2003). Mx: Statistical Modeling (5th ed.). Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Ooki, S., Yamada, K., & Asaka, A. (1993). Zygosity diagnosis of twins by questionnaire for twins’ mothers. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae (Roma), 42, 1722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., de Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M., & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallis, J. F., Prochaska, J. J., & Taylor, W. C. (2000). A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 963975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallies, J. K., Alcaraz, J. E., Mckenzie, T. L., & Hovell, M. F. (1999). Predictors of change in children’s physical activity over 20 months: Variations by gender and level of adiposity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16, 222229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, N. M., Nederend, I., Hudziak, J. J., Bartels, M., & de Geus, E. J. C. (2017). Heritability of the affective response to exercise and its correlation to exercise behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 139148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubbe, J. H., Boomsma, D. I., Vink, J. M., Cornes, B. K., Martin, N. G., Skytthe, A., … de Geus, E. J. C. (2006). Genetic influences on exercise participation in 37.051 twin pairs from seven countries. PLoS ONE, 1, e22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Aa, N., de Geus, E. J. C., van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., Boomsma, D. I., & Bartels, M. (2010). Genetic influences on individual differences in exercise behavior during adolescence. International Journal of Pediatrics, 138345. doi: 10.1155/2010/138345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Mechelen, W., Twisk, J. W., Post, G. B., Snel, J., & Kemper, H. C. (2000). Physical activity of young people: The Amsterdam Longitudinal Growth and Health Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 16101616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vink, J. M., Boomsma, D. I., Medland, S. E., de Moor, M. H. M., Stubbe, J. H., Cornes, B. K., … de Geus, E. J. C. (2011). Variance components models for physical activity with age as modifier: A comparative twin study in seven countries. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 14, 2534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, B., Gao, W., Lv, J., Yu, C., Wang, S., Pang, Z., … Li, L. (2016). Physical activity attenuates genetic effects on BMI: Results from a study of Chinese adult twins. Obesity, 24, 750756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wannamethee, S. G., & Shaper, A. G. (2001). Physical activity in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: An epidemiological perspective. Sports Medicine, 31, 101114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Additive genetic (A), common environmental (C) and individual environment and measurement error (E) effects on frequency of vigorous exercise (FVE) for opposite-sex dizygotic twin pairs. Subscripts m and f refer to male and female, respectively. rc, common environmental correlation; M, moderator (age); β, regression coefficient for M; µ, main effects of age on FVE.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Frequency of vigorous exercise per week in males (black) and females (gray) in the total sample.ns, not significant.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Tetrachoric correlations (95% CI) for frequency of vigorous exercise per week for MZM (monozygotic male), DZM (dizygotic male), MZF (monozygotic female), DZF (dizygotic female) and OSDZ (opposite-sex dizygotic) twins.

Figure 3

Table 1. Results of model-fitting analysis for frequency of vigorous exercise per week

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Additive genetic (A; black), common environmental (C; dark gray) and individual environmental influences including measurement error (E; light gray) on frequency of vigorous exercise per week in the best-fitting model for males and females.95% confidence intervals are in parenthesis.