Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-mqbnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-26T04:08:28.557Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Serbian Twin Registry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2019

Snežana Smederevac*
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Dušanka Mitrović
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Selka Sadiković
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Ilija Milovanović
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Bojan Branovački
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Bojana M. Dinić
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Željka Nikolašević
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Jasmina Kodžopeljić
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Vojislava Bugarski Ignjatović
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Marija Semnic
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Tijana Vujanić Stankov
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Nataša Vučinić
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Milan Oljača
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Dejan Pajić
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Aleksandra Stojadinović
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Tatjana Krstić
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Aleksandra Milutinović
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
Author for correspondence: Snežana Smederevac, Email:


The first twin study in Serbia began in 2011 as a part of the research project, ‘Psychological Foundations of Mental Health: Hereditary and Environmental Factors’. At the same time, the research team from the Faculty of Philosophy and Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad established the first Serbian twin registry. The registry is intended primarily for the purpose of the research in behavioral genetics, as well as potential future studies in human genetics. It includes information on 1658 volunteers, including twin-pairs, their parent and siblings. The behavioral genetic study of adult twins has been focused on the hereditary and environmental sources of variance of different psychological characteristics, such as personality traits, cognitive abilities, executive functions and aggression, as well as some anthropometric measures and aspects of mental and physical health. Certain molecular genetic analyses have also been performed. The research team is currently starting the longitudinal twin study of children, which will be focused on different indicators of emotional, cognitive and physical development.

© The Author(s) 2019 

Background of the First Twin Study in Serbia

The Serbian Twin Registry (STR) was created in 2011 as a part of the research project ‘Psychological Foundations of Mental Health: Hereditary and Environmental Factors’, granted by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia. Researchers participating in the study are from the Department of Psychology at the Faculty of Philosophy and from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Novi Sad. This interdisciplinary team is trying to answer some important questions of behavioral genetics. The registry is intended primarily for the purpose of the research in behavioral genetics, as well as studies in molecular human genetics. In 2014, the research team established the Center for Behavioral Genetics (CBG), as an organizational unit of the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad, in which biometric and molecular genetic analyses are conducted, based on the data collected through the STR. The STR and the CBG are the first and only institutions of this type in Serbia.

Recruitment of the Twins and Online Platform for Data Collection

The official website of the STR is available at The website provides information on the importance of twin research for science, scientific results of previous twin studies, facts about the project, research team and the CBG. Twins and their parents who are willing to take part in the research can apply for participation through the publicly available application form on the STR website. Invitations for participation are being sent via media, press, newspapers, social networks, promotional posters and leaflets, and through various public campaigns. After the participants submit the application to the STR, we are reaching them through an email or telephone contact to take part in the study. Additionally, a custom web application was developed in order to distribute questionnaires online and collect data directly into the database. Data collection platform is available only to registered twin-pairs having unique security codes, in order to protect potentially sensitive personal information. Through the web application, twin-pairs can complete all the test material, which significantly facilitates and accelerates the process of data collection.

Ethical Issues

All procedures for the twin study were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad, Serbia, which is the Second Instance Commission of the Ethical Committee of the Serbian Psychological Society. The approval certificate can be found at the following link:

Before participation in the study, all twins were informed about the main purpose of the study and signed informed consent forms. Since the Competitive Reaction Time Task (CRTT) includes deception about the real purpose of the examination, all participants were debriefed immediately after they finished this task. Namely, in this procedure, participants were led to believe that they compete with each other in reaction time, but actually there was no real competition.


The STR contains information on 1658 volunteers, including twins, their parents and siblings (Figure 1). A total of 722 registered twin-pairs includes 295 twin-pairs who were already registered and tested, 327 youth and 100 adult twin-pairs who were registered and scheduled to be tested in the next stage of the study. Additionally, the STR includes 214 family members of the twins. Following their participation in the research, twins were asked to invite their family members to join this research and complete several self-report questionnaires (Table 1).

Fig. 1. The participants of the Serbian Twin Registry as of 2019.

Table 1. List of measures

NEO PI-R = NEO personality inventory; NEO-FFI = NEO five-factor inventory; RSQ = reinforcement sensitivity questionnaire; SSS V = sensation seeking scale; AQ = aggression questionnaire; CRTT = competitive reaction time task; APM = advanced progressive matrices; WCST = Wisconsin Card sorting test; TMT = trail making test; VFT = verbal fluency test; BEQ = block environmental questionnaire; ASRQ = adult sibling relationship questionnaire; PDSQ = psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaire; SWLS = satisfaction with life scale; COMT = Catechol-O-methylTransferase; DRD2 = dopamine D2 receptor; BDNF = brain-derived neurotrophic factor; HTR1A = hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A; TPH2 = tryptophan hydroxylase 2.

Table 2 presents participants of the STR who finished testing as of 2019. We examined 295 twin-pairs who were reared together. Twin participants were aged 16–60 years old with an average age of 24.49 (SD = 7.59). Among the pairs, there were 180 monozygotic (MZ) twins and 93 dizygotic (DZ) twins. For the remaining 22 twin-pairs, zygosity has not yet been determined and is currently being analyzed. In total, there were 263 male and 541 female participants, including twins and their family members. Among the DZ twin-pairs, there were 47 opposite-sex pairs and 46 same-sex gender pairs. Family members of 96 twin-pairs participated in the study, of whom there were 76 fathers, 86 mothers and 52 siblings (20 brothers and 32 sisters).

Table 2. Participants (N = 804) who completed tests in the Serbian Twin Registry as of 2019

N = number of individuals (not pairs); SS = same-sex; MZ = monozygotic twins; DZ = dizygotic twins; unknown = zygosity unknown; Age = age in years; OSDZ = opposite-sex dizygotic twins.

Zygosity Determination

Zygosity was determined by DNA analysis of buccal swabs and is still being determined for new samples. The research was performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. One part of the DNA samples was analyzed at the Institute of Forensic Medicine Novi Sad, and the other part at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. For new samples, analyses are still ongoing at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York, NY. DNA is tested using short tandem repeat megaplex kits, either Investigator 24plex GO! (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) or GlobalFiler kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Both kits detect 21 autosomal short tandem repeats. A completely concordant pair with these short tandem repeats is interpreted as a MZ twin-pair and all the other pairs are designated as DZ.

For a small part of sample (1%), the zygosity was determined using the Twins Physical Resemblance Questionnaire (Oniszczenko et al., Reference Oniszczenko, Angleitner, Strelau and Angert1993). This questionnaire includes a series of questions about similarities and dissimilarities between two twins, within twin-pairs (e.g., eye color, body weight and body height). These items have been shown to be valid indicators of zygosity, with zygosity determination being accurate around 95% (e.g., Čolović et al., Reference Čolović, Branovački and Zgonjanin Bosić2019; Reed et al., Reference Reed, Plassman, Tanner, Dick, Rinehart and Nichols2005).


The behavioral genetic study of adult twins has been focused on the hereditary and environmental sources of variance of different psychological characteristics, such as personality traits, cognitive abilities, executive functions and aggression, as well as some anthropometric measures and aspects of mental and physical health.

Therefore, the measures are divided into several primary areas: personality assessment, assessment of cognitive abilities, assessment of executive functions, assessment of family environment, life events, aspects of mental health, assessment of laboratory-induced aggression, medical examination and DNA sampling.

Personality Measures

Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, Reference Costa and McCrae1992) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa & McCrae, Reference Costa and McCrae1992; Costa & McCrae, Reference Costa and McCrae2019). The NEO PI-R is designed to assess Big Five personality traits — Openness to Experience (O), Conscientiousness (C), Extraversion (E), Agreeableness (A), and Neuroticism (N) — with 240 items, while the NEO-FFI is a short version of the NEO PI-R, comprising 60 items.

Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire (Smederevac et al., Reference Smederevac, Mitrović, Čolović and Nikolašević2014) is based on the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST; Gray & McNaughton, Reference Gray and McNaughton2000) and contains 29 items with a 4-point Likert scale distributed in 5 scales: Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), Behavioral activation system (BAS); Fight, and Flight and Freeze.

Sensation Seeking Scale (Zuckerman, Reference Zuckerman1994) consists of 40 items with a 5-point Likert scale, measuring 4 components of sensation seeking: Thrill and Adventure Seeking, Experience Seeking, Disinhibition and Boredom Susceptibility.

Aggression Questionnaire (Buss & Perry, Reference Buss and Perry1992; for Serbian adaptation see Dinić & Janičić, Reference Dinić and Janičić2012) consists of 29 items with a 5-point Likert scale, measuring 4 components of aggressiveness: Physical and Verbal Aggression, Anger, and Hostility.

CRTT (also known as the Taylor Aggression Paradigm, Taylor, Reference Taylor1967; for details see Warburton & Bushman, Reference Warburton and Bushman2019) has been used for aggression induction. In this procedure, twins are led to believe they are competing with each other in the reaction time tasks. Before each task, each twin has an opportunity to set the ‘punishment’ for his/her twin-pair. The punishment comprised a settled intensity and duration of an aversive noise. If one twin lost, he/she would receive the punishment determined by the winning twin. There were 4 blocks in the procedure (each contained 10 tasks), with the first block designed as a practice in which twins only gave the punishment and did not receive it if they lost. In the 2–4 blocks, twins received predetermined punishments that increased during the procedure. In each block, it was settled that participants randomly won in 50% of the tasks. The aggression measures were settled intensity and duration of the punishments by twins.

Cognition Measures

Advanced Progressive Matrices (Raven et al., Reference Raven, Raven and Court1998) is a nonverbal type of test that measures fluid intelligence. It consists of 48 multichoice questions, listed in order of difficulty.

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (Heaton et al., Reference Heaton, Chelune, Talley, Kay and Curtiss1993) assesses the possibility of creating and changing the principles of categorization, using the task of classifying a series of cards according to one of the three classification criteria (color, form and number of elements).

Trail Making Test — Form A and B (Reitan, Reference Reitan1955; Spreen & Strauss, Reference Spreen and Strauss1998). This test consists of two parts, each with a specific aim. The first part aims to measure attention, concentration, visual observation, visuospatial estimation and visuomotor abilities, while the second part assesses complex conceptual monitoring, as a type of executive abilities.

Verbal Fluency Test — Phonemic and Category (Goodglass & Kaplan, Reference Goodglass and Kaplan1983; Lezak, Reference Lezak1995). The test consists of three tasks of phonemic and one task of categorical fluency. Verbal fluency is measured by the number of words produced in the unit of time. Words are usually limited to certain categories. Phonemic fluency is assessed by a test of controlled oral associations, including phonemes S/K/L in language equivalent to the Verbal Fluency Test (FAS) in the English language. In the Category fluency test, the respondents were asked to generate exemplars from a given category. In this study, the respondents were asked to indicate, within a minute, as many different animals as possible.

Participants completed two computer-based tasks of executive functions designed for this research. The first computer-based task (Go/No-Go task) was used to assess the ability of Inhibition. The second computer-based task was used to assess Mental Shifting/Flexibility abilities. The computer-based tasks are supported in PsychoPy 1.74 for Windows software, which is in the public domain.

Environment Measures

Block Environmental Questionnaire (German version; Riemann & Wagner, Reference Riemann and Wagner2000) derived from the American version (Hur & Bouchard, Reference Hur and Bouchard1995) is a 5-point Likert-type questionnaire intended to assess retrospective perceptions of family environment in twin families. It consists of six scales: Acceptance/Rejection by Mother, Acceptance/Rejection by Father, Family Cohesion, Intellectual Orientation of Mother, Intellectual Orientation of Father and Family Organization.

Adult Sibling Relationship Questionnaire (Stocker et al., Reference Stocker, Lanthier and Furman1995) assesses characteristics of the relationship between twins by self-reported behaviors and feelings toward siblings, as well as perceptions of siblings’ behavior and feelings toward them. The questionnaire includes 81 items conceptually grouped into 14 scales: Intimacy, Affection, Knowledge, Acceptance, Similarity, Admiration, Emotional Support, Instrumental Support, Dominance, Competition, Antagonism, Quarrelling, Maternal Rivalry and Paternal Rivalry.

Life Events List (Plomin et al., Reference Plomin, Lichtenstein, Pedersen, Mcclearn and Nesselroade1990; Saudino et al., Reference Saudino, Pedersen, Lichtenstein, McClearn and Plomin1997) consists of 31 life events, while response categories are (1) never, (2) one-time and (3) repeatedly experienced within the last 5 years. In addition, twins rated the valence of the experiences on a scale ranging from very negative (−3) to very positive (+3).

Mental Health Measures

Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ; Zimmerman, Reference Zimmerman2002) consists of 123 items, assessing Axis I psychopathology. The PDSQ is a screening instrument for Major Depressive Disorder, PTSD, Bulimia/Binge-Eating Disorder, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Panic Disorder, Psychosis, Agoraphobia, Social Phobia, Alcohol Abuse/Dependence, Drug Abuse/Dependence, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Somatization Disorder, and Hypochondriasis.

Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener et al., Reference Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin1985) consists of five items with a 5-point Likert scale and assesses the cognitive component of subjective well-being.

General Medical Examination

A general medical examination included a general physical and neurological exam, as well as the measurement of the body height, weight and subsequent anthropometric measurements (skinfolds: chest, subscapular, midaxillary, biceps, triceps, abdominal, suprailiac, supraspinal, thigh and calf; circumference: head, neck, forearm, upper arm relaxed and flexed, chest, waist, hip, quadriceps and calf; diameter: femur, humerus, forearm, forearm and hand, and thigh). Body height and weight were used to obtain the body mass index (BMI).

A general physical exam consisted of personal medical history since birth, childhood and adolescence; family history regarding twin pregnancies and the history of neurological disorders and physical illnesses; and a structured physical exam with an evaluation of the heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate. The neurological exam evaluated the status of cranial nerves, pyramidal, extrapyramidal, cerebellar, sensory and peripheral nerves, as well as the walking and speaking ability.

Data Collection and Procedures

Data collection is mostly done at the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad, while a small part of the sample was collected in other Serbian cities: Belgrade, Niš, Zrenjanin and Novi Pazar. The session lasts from 3 to 5 h, with a break for a meal and refreshments. The examination itself is conducted in several stages:

  1. (1) The twin-pair undergoes a general medical examination.

  2. (2) Buccal swabs are taken from the twin-pair for DNA analysis.

  3. (3) The twin-pair participates in a comprehensive interview, in which both twins provide basic information about their similarities and differences, preexisting illnesses, schooling and family opportunities while growing up.

  4. (4) The twin-pair completes personality and intellectual assessment tests. Participants performed executive function tests individually with trained researchers.

  5. (5) The twin-pair participates in computer-based testing of executive functions.

  6. (6) The twin-pair participates in computer-based testing of laboratory-induced aggression.

After the examination process, every twin-pair receives information about the test results by email or at their home address in the form of the report on personality structure and cognitive performance.

Molecular Genetic Analysis

Until now, molecular genetic analyses have been performed for Human Catechol-O-methylTransferase (COMT), dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) and Human Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) genes, while all necessary preparations have been made for the tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) and Gene 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 1A (HTR1A) genes.

The COMT gene, located at position 22q11, consists of six exons, of which the first two are noncoding. One of the most studied polymorphisms is Val158Met (rs4680) in the fourth exon, which is involved in biosynthesis and metabolism of dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine (Salunkhea et al., Reference Salunkhea, Feigeb, Savillec, Lancasterd, Stefanoua, Bendere and Klein2019).

The DRD2 gene is located at the 11q22.3-11q23.1 position, consisting of eight exons, codes for a G-protein-bound receptor, expressed predominantly in the hippocampus, which is considered to have a protective effect on memory. One of the most frequently studied polymorphisms is rs1800497 and SNP rs1800497, which have been associated with many behavioral phenotypes (Klaus et al., Reference Klaus, Butler, Curtis, Bridle and Pennington2019).

The BDNF gene is located on chromosome 11p13 and consists of 11 exons (Pruunsild et al., Reference Pruunsild, Kazantseva, Aid, Palm and Timmusk2007). One of its most frequent single nucleotide polymorphisms is rs6265 at position 196 of exon 2, which results in valine (val) to methionine (met) substitution at codon 66 (Val66Met). The consequences of this polymorphism involve alterations of BDNF intracellular packaging, its axonal transport and activity-dependent secretion at the synapse (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Patel, Sant, Meng, Teng, Hempstead and Lee2004).

The TPH2 gene, located at chromosome 12q21.1, encodes a member of the pterin-dependent aromatic acid hydroxylase family. The encoded protein catalyzes the first and rate-limiting step in the biosynthesis of serotonin, an important hormone and neurotransmitter. One of the TPH2 gene’s frequent polymorphisms is rs4570625, also known as G-703T, which has been linked to several psychiatric and/or behavioral phenomena (Gao et al., Reference Gao, Pan, Jiao, Li, Zhao, Wei, Pan and Evangelou2012).

The HTR1A gene, which encodes a G-protein-coupled receptor for 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin), is located at chromosome 5q12.3. One of the most investigated polymorphisms of this gene is rs6295, which leads to the replacement of C with G (Drago et al., Reference Drago, Ronchi and Serretti2007).

DNA was extracted using standard DNA extraction techniques (QIAgen, Hilden, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer. The genotyping of the DRD2 gene (rs1800497), COMT gene (rs4680) and BDNF gene (rs6265) was carried out using TaqMan assays (TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK), as recommended by the manufacturer at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Serbia. The TaqMan SNP genotyping assays uses TaqMan 5′ nuclease chemistry for amplifying and detecting specific polymorphisms in purified genomic DNA samples and takes advantage of minor groove-binding probes for superior allelic discrimination. The SNP genotyping assays contain a VIC-dye-labeled probe and FAM-dye-labeled probe with two target-specific primers. PCR is performed using 10 ng of genomic DNA together with 1 µl TaqMan genotyping assay and 12.5 µl of genotyping master mix in a final 25 µl reaction on a 96-well plate using ABI Prism 7500 Fast PCR device (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). DRD2, COMT and BDNF alleles with the specific fluorescence curves were detected and analyzed using the 7500 System SDS program, integrated into the ABI Prism 7500 Fast PCR device. The genotyping of the TPH2 and HTR1A will begin by the end of 2019.


Our research team collaborates with Professor Rainer Riemann from the University of Bielefeld, who helped design the study at its beginning. A great help in determining zygosity via DNA analysis has been provided by Mechthild Prinz from John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York and Zoran Budimlija from the Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, New York.

Preliminary results of the first behavioral genetic study in Serbia have been published in the special issue of Primenjena Psihologija, dedicated to behavioral genetics (Dinić et al., Reference Dinić, Nikolašević, Oljača and Bugarski Ignjatović2019; Jovanov & Zgonjanin Bosić, Reference Jovanov and Zgonjanin Bosić2019; Milovanović et al., Reference Milovanović, Sadiković and Kodžopeljić2019; Nikolašević et al., Reference Nikolašević, Bugarski-Ignjatović, Milovanović and Raković2014; Sadiković et al., Reference Sadiković, Smederevac, Mitrović and Milovanović2019). Primenjena Psihologija (Applied Psychology) is an open access journal of high importance in Serbia.

Future Plans

Our future activities are organized in three directions. First, we intend to conduct further data collection from already tested participants in order to examine the relationship between epigenetic change and the development of different psychological phenomena across the life span. Second, we are preparing the assessment of the young twins from the earliest period of their childhood through the end of adolescence, and further. In our register, there are 327 pairs of young twins (101 pairs aged 0–5; 163 pairs aged 6–10; 42 pairs aged 11–14; and 21 pairs aged 15–17) whose parents had applied to participate in our study. Our medical team has organized the systematic examination of psychomotor and socioemotional development of the youngest twins through standard medical procedures (medical history, measurement of weight, height, BMI, comparison with the World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Standards for children and complete physical examination; WHO, 2016), but also using the parent reports by Ages and Stages Questionnaires (Squires & Bricker, Reference Squires and Bricker2009; Squires et al, Reference Squires, Bricker and Twombly2015). Our medical team has also organized the systematic examination of the school twin cohort through the same medical procedures mentioned above and comparison with the World Health Organization Growth Reference Data for 5–19 years (WHO, 2013). The school twin cohort will be examined partly through parent reports on our online platform, and partly by individual testing, depending on the twins’ age. Parents will respond to a set of questionnaires that are primarily intended to evaluate personality (Kodžopeljić et al., Reference Kodžopeljić, Smederevac, Mitrović, Čolović and Pajić2019) and executive functions (Thorell & Nyberg, Reference Thorell and Nyberg2008) in children. Individual testing will include assessment of intelligence using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children form IV (WISC-IV) (Wechsler, Reference Wechsler2003, adapted by Matešić, Reference Matešić2009), emotional regulation using the ERQ — Child Version (Gullone & Taffe, Reference Gullone and Taffe2012) and satisfaction with life using the SWLS — Child Version (Gadermann et al., Reference Gadermann, Schonert-Reichl and Zumbo2009), and also assessment of some new constructs in children twin studies, such as math anxiety (Hart et al., Reference Hart, Logan, Thompson, Kovas, McLoughlin and Petrill2016). We are also planning to collect information about parents and siblings through time in order to conduct longitudinal research and a nuclear family twin study. The third direction of our plans is aimed to investigate the molecular genetic basis of different psychological phenomena in children and adults, mapping the genetic factors that are related to serotonin- and dopamine-induced behaviors or psychological traits. Overall, our intention in the future is to provide an extensive dataset that could be used for improving not only the knowledge about the behavioral genetic foundations of human characteristics but also quality of life, using the biopsychosocial twin research framework.

Open Science and Science Communication

Relying on the attitude that ‘the field is imbued with an ethos of building a progressive science based on replicable findings’ (Plomin et al., Reference Plomin, Defries, Knopik and Neiderhiser2016, p. 17), our research team is dedicated to replicating previous findings in behavioral genetics and respecting the basic principles of open science.

Data regarding CRTT task, zygosity, polymorphisms, AQ and RST as well as CRTT procedure in PsychoPy software can be found at OSF: Data regarding behavioral genetic study of NEO-FFI personality traits in German, Croatian and Serbian culture can be found at OSF:

In order to popularize STR, raise awareness about the importance of twin studies and engage community members in research, STR and CBG activities are continuously being promoted through various public campaigns, events, lectures and TV appearances. One of the key events of this kind is the National Twins Day, organized annually by the CBG team at the University of Novi Sad in the first week of June. The event features assorted activities, such as presenting research results, organizing workshops for parents and children, art performances, prize games, as well as recruiting new participants. Twins who had participated in the research receives the results of their personality profiles, cognitive abilities, general health and zygosity. National Twins Day gathers not only twins and their families, but also the members of the academic and public community. Another relevant science communication event is the annual National Science Festival where the CBG team presents their current research and popularize STR through various popular science projects, such as the ‘Who is your movie hero twin?’ online questionnaire.


The authors would like to thank Rainer Riemann for his great help in all stages of our study, Dragana Zgonjanin and Mechthild Prinz for their great help in determining DNA zygosity and Petar Čolović for his great help in creating scripts for quantitative molecular genetic analysis in R environment (Čolović, Reference Čolović2019). We are grateful for the great contribution of alumni: Biljana Vulović, Filip Nenadić, Milan Jordanov, Dina Bojić, Tomislav Ludajić, Sara Raković, Tamara Otašević, Miljana Marić Ognjenović, Katarina Ostojić, Ana Stanković, Tijana Brzić, Tea Teofanovska, Vojana Obradović, Anđela Cvetićanin, Dragana Nedeljković, Jelena Milošević, Jelena Mitrović, Slobodan Golušin, Dragan Đunda, Mina Velimirović, Marija Bulat, Luka Todorović, Damir Bogdan, Tamara Stanojković and psychology students: Milana Jovanov, Ivona Jerković, Luna Radević, Marko Milošević and Nataša Katić.

Financial support

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (#179006).


Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z.-Y., Patel, P. D., Sant, G., Meng, C. X., Teng, K. K., Hempstead, B. L., & Lee, F. S. (2004). Variant brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Met66) alters the intracellular trafficking and activity-dependent secretion of wild-type BDNF in neurosecretory cells and cortical neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 44014411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Čolović, P. (2019). Petarcolovic/R_CqBG 1.0.0-Beta. Zenodo open data repository.Google Scholar
Čolović, P., Branovački, B., & Zgonjanin Bosić, D. (2019). Validation of zygosity assessment by a self-report questionnaire in a sample of adult Serbian twins. Primenjena Psihologija, 11, 419432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2019). Srpska standardizacija NEO petofaktorskog inventara NEO-FFI: forma S [The Serbian standardization of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory NEO-FFI: Form S]. Beograd: Sinapsa Edicije.Google Scholar
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 7175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinić, B., & Janičić, B. (2012). Evaluation of Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire with item response theory (IRT). Psihologija, 45, 189207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinić, B., Nikolašević, Ž., Oljača, M., & Bugarski Ignjatović, V. (2019). Twin study of aggressiveness and impulsiveness relationship. Primenjena Psihologija, 11, 451470.Google Scholar
Drago, A., Ronchi, D. D., & Serretti, A. (2007). 5-HT1A gene variants and psychiatric disorders: A review of current literature and selection of SNPs for future studies. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 11, 701721.Google ScholarPubMed
Gadermann, A. M., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2009). Investigating validity evidence of the satisfaction with life scale adapted for children. Social Indicators Research, 96, 229247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, J., Pan, Z., Jiao, Z., Li, F., Zhao, G., Wei, Q., Pan, F., & Evangelou, E. (2012) TPH2 gene polymorphisms and major depression – A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 7, e36721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gullone, E., & Taffe, J. (2012). The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ–CA): A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 24, 409417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, S. A., Logan, J. A. R., Thompson, L., Kovas, Y., McLoughlin, G., & Petrill, S. A. (2016). A latent profile analysis of math achievement, numerosity, and math anxiety in twins. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 181193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin card sorting test manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Hur, Y.-M., & Bouchard, T. J. (1995). Genetic influences on perceptions of childhood family environment: A reared apart twin study. Child Development, 66, 330345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovanov, M., & Zgonjanin Bosić, D. (2019). Sensation seeking and risky behaviors in light of genetic and environmental factors. Primenjena Psihologija, 11, 471486.Google Scholar
Klaus, K., Butler, K., Curtis, F., Bridle, C., & Pennington, K. (2019). The effect of ANKK1 Taq1A and DRD2 C957T polymorphisms on executive function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 100, 224236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kodžopeljić, J., Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P., & Pajić, D. (2019). Velikih pet plus dva za decu – primena i interpretacija [Big Five plus Two for Children – Application and interpretation]. Beograd: Centar za Primenjenu Psihologiju.Google Scholar
Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matešić, K. (2009). Wechlerov test inteligencije za decu – četvrto izdanje – WISC IV [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – Fourth Edition – WISC-IV]. Jasterbarsko: Naklada Slap.Google Scholar
Milovanović, I., Sadiković, S., & Kodžopeljić, J. (2019). Genetic and environmental factors in emotion regulation and life satisfaction: A twin study. Primenjena Psihologija, 11, 399417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolašević, Ž., Bugarski-Ignjatović, V., Milovanović, I., & Raković, S. (2014). Inteligencija i školsko postignuće u svetlu naslednih i sredinskih činilaca [Intelligence and school achievement in light of genetic and environmental factors]. Primenjena Psihologija, 7, 381400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oniszczenko, W., Angleitner, A., Strelau, J., & Angert, T. (1993). The Questionnaire of Twins’ Physical Resemblance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., Knopik, V. S., & Neiderhiser, J. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plomin, R., Lichtenstein, P., Pedersen, N. L., Mcclearn, G. E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1990). Genetic influence on life events during the last half of the life span. Psychology and Aging, 5, 2530.Google ScholarPubMed
Pruunsild, P., Kazantseva, A., Aid, T., Palm, K., & Timmusk, T. (2007). Dissecting the human BDNF locus: Bidirectional transcription, complex splicing, and multiple promoters. Genomics, 90, 397406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual: Section 1, general overview. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Reed, T., Plassman, B. L., Tanner, C. M., Dick, D. M., Rinehart, S. A., & Nichols, W. C. (2005). Verification of self-report of zygosity determined via DNA testing in a subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 years later. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 362367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitan, R. M. (1955). The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 19, 393394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riemann, R., & Wagner, R. (2000). Deutsche Version des Block Environmental Questionnaire nach Hur & Bouchard (German version of BEQ). Unpublished questionnaire.Google Scholar
Sadiković, S., Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., & Milovanović, I. (2019). Behavioral genetics foundations of relations between personality traits and satisfaction with life. Primenjena Psihologija, 11, 487502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salunkhea, G., Feigeb, B., Savillec, C. W. N., Lancasterd, T. M., Stefanoua, M. E., Bendere, S., … Klein, C. (2019). The impact of the COMT genotype and cognitive demands on facets of intrasubject variability. Brain and Cognition, 132, 7279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudino, K. J., Pedersen, N. L., Lichtenstein, P., McClearn, G. E., & Plomin, R. (1997). Can personality explain genetic influences on life events? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 196206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smederevac, S., Mitrović, D., Čolović, P., & Nikolašević, Ž. (2014). Validation of the measure of revised reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squires, J., & Bricker, D. (2009). Ages & stages questionnaires®: A parent-completed child monitoring system (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Squires, J., Bricker, D., & Twombly, E. (2015). Ages & stages questionnaires®: Social-emotional: A parent-completed child monitoring system for social-emotional behaviors (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Stocker, C., Lanthier, R., & Furman, W. (1995) The adult sibling relationship questionnaire. Denver, CO: University of Denver.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35, 297310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorell, L. B., & Nyberg, L. (2008). The Childhood Executive Functioning Inventory (CHEXI): A new rating instrument for parents and teachers, Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 526552.Google ScholarPubMed
Warburton, W. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2019). The competitive reaction time task: The development and scientific utility of a flexible laboratory aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 45, 389396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition (WISC-IV). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO). (2013). Growth reference data for 5–19 years. Retrieved from Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). The WHO child growth standards. Retrieved from Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (2002). The psychiatric diagnostic screening questionnaire manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biological bases of sensation seeking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The participants of the Serbian Twin Registry as of 2019.

Figure 1

Table 1. List of measures

Figure 2

Table 2. Participants (N = 804) who completed tests in the Serbian Twin Registry as of 2019