Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T22:45:19.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An adaptation of the Cambridge Colour Test for use with animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

KATHERINE MANCUSO
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
MAUREEN NEITZ
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
JAY NEITZ
Affiliation:
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Abstract

Recently, molecular biological techniques have presented new opportunities for addressing questions concerning the neural mechanisms involved in color coding, thereby rousing renewed interest in animal color vision testing. We have modified a computer-based assessment tool, the Cambridge Colour Test, to make it suitable for use with animals. Here, the validity and reliability of the testing method were evaluated using squirrel monkeys. Because the chromatic stimuli and the achromatic backgrounds of the test consist of dots that vary in lightness, the stimulus parameters can be adjusted so that animals are not able to use luminance differences to make correct discriminations. Thus, in contrast to methods used previously, this test does not require that time be spent equating the luminance of each chromatic stimulus examined. Furthermore, the computer video-display based design of the testing apparatus can be easily replicated and adapted for use with many species in a variety of settings. In the present experiments, the squirrel monkeys' behavioral results agreed with the predictions for their color vision based on genetic analysis and electroretinography (ERG) spectral sensitivity data. Repeated measurements were highly consistent. Thus, an adaptation of the Cambridge Colour Test provides a valid and reliable method for testing color vision in animals.

Type
TESTING AND METHODS
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carroll, J., McMahon, C., Neitz, M., & Neitz, J. (2000). Flicker-photometric electroretinogram estimates of L:M cone photoreceptor ratio in men with photopigment spectra derived from genetics. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17, 499509.Google Scholar
Carroll, J., Neitz, M., & Neitz, J. (2002). Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. Journal of Vision 2, 531542.Google Scholar
Hanazawa, A., Mikami, A., Angelika, P.S., Takenaka, O., Goto, S., Onishi, A., Koike, S., Yamamori, T., Kato, K., Kondo, A., Suryobroto, B., Farajallah, A., & Komatsu, H. (2001). Electroretinogram analysis of relative spectral sensitivity in genetically identified dichromatic macaques. PNAS 98, 81248127.Google Scholar
Hecht, S. & Shlaer, S. (1936). The color vision of dichromats. Journal of General Physiology 20, 5782.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (1981). Comparative Color Vision. New York: Academic Press.
Jacobs, G.H. (1984). Within-species variations in visual capacity among squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): Color vision. Vision Research 24, 12671277.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (1993). The distribution and nature of colour vision among the mammals. Biological Reviews 68, 413471.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (1998). A perspective on color vision in platyrrhine monkeys. Vision Research 38, 33073313.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H. (2004). Comparative color vision. In The Visual Neurosciences, Vol. 2, ed. Chalupa, L. & Werner, J.S., pp. 962973. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jacobs, G.H., Neitz, M., Deegan, J.F., II, & Neitz, J. (1996a). Trichromatic colour vision in New World monkeys. Nature 382, 156158.Google Scholar
Jacobs, G.H., Neitz, J., & Krogh, K. (1996b). Electroretinogram flicker photometry and its applications. Journal of the Optical Society of America 13, 641648.Google Scholar
Neitz, J., Geist, T., & Jacobs, G.H. (1989). Color vision in the dog. Visual Neuroscience 3, 119125.Google Scholar
Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G.H. (1984). Electroretinogram measurements of cone spectral sensitivity in dichromatic monkeys. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1, 11751180.Google Scholar
Neitz, M., Neitz, J., & Jacobs, G.H. (1991). Spectral tuning of pigments underlying red-green color vision. Science 252, 971974.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., & Lutze, M. (1987). Aging of the human lens. Applied Optics 26, 14371440.Google Scholar
Reffin, J.P., Astell, S., & Mollon, J.D. (1991). Trials of a computer-controlled colour vision test that preserves the advantages of pseudo-isochromatic plates. In Colour Vision Deficiencies, Vol. 1, pp. 6976. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Regan, B.C., Reffin, J.P., & Mollon, J.D. (1994). Luminance noise and the rapid determination of discrimination ellipses in colour deficiency. Vision Research 34, 12791299.Google Scholar
Saito, A., Mikami, A., Hasegawa, T., Koida, K., Terao, K., Koike, S., Onishi, A., Takenaka, O., Teramoto, M., & Mori, Y. (2003). Behavioral evidence of color vision deficiency in a protanomalia chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates 44, 171176.Google Scholar