Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T04:34:00.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between preferred orientation and ordinal position in neurones of cat striate cortex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

T. R. Vidyasagar  and
G. H. Henry
T. R. Vidyasagar
Affiliation:
John Curtin School of Medical Research and Centre for Visual Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
G. H. Henry
Affiliation:
John Curtin School of Medical Research and Centre for Visual Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Striate cortical cells were classified according to whether or not their preferred orientation was close to one of the “primary” orientations (horizontal, vertical or radial, i.e. directed to the area centralis) and according to their ordinal position on the afferent pathway from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN). Among the neurones that could be driven monosynaptically from the dLGN, there was a high representation of those with a preference for the primary orientations. This was particularly evident in the case of C (complex) cells. There was no such preponderance of primary orientations among the polysynaptically activated cells. It is proposed that the asymmetry of distribution seen among the first-order cells reflects the asymmetry seen subcortically in neurones that show orientation biases. It may be that the cortex elaborates a more uniform representation of orientations only at the higher ordinal levels.

Keywords

Striate cortexPreferred orientationOrdinal positionLatency to electrical stimulation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 5 , Issue 6 , December 1990 , pp. 565 - 569
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, B. (1989). Orientation bias of cat retinal ganglion cells: a reassessment. Experimental Brain Research 76, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blakemore, C., Garey, L. J. & Vital-Durand, F. (1981). Orientation preferences in the monkey's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 319, 78P.Google Scholar
Bullier, J. & Hentry, G.H. (1979). Ordinal position of neurons in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 42, 1251–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Creutzfeldt, O.D. & Nothdurft, H.C. (1978). Representation of complex visual the brain. Naturwissenschaften 65, 317–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, J.D., Norman, J.L. & Pettigrew, J.D. (1977). Biases for oriented moving bars in lateral geniculate nucleus of normal and stripereared cats. Experimental Brain Research 29, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fregnac, Y. & Imbert, M. (1978). Early development of visual cortical cells in normal and dark-reared kittens: relationship between orientation selectivity and ocular dominance. Journal of Physiology 278, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, P. (1974). Cat retinal ganglion cells: size and shape of receptive-field centres. Journal of Physiology 242, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, G.H. (1977). Receptive-field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat. Brain Research 133, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, G.H., Dreher, B. & Bishop, P.O. (1974). Orientation specificity of cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 6, 1394–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, G.H., Harvey, A.R. & Lund, J.S. (1979). The afferent connections and laminar distribution of cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 187, 725–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 160, 106–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecutre of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology 195, 215–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, A.G. (1983). Relationshp between preferred orientation and receptive-field position of neurones in cat striate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 220, 476–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventhal, A.G. & Schall, J.D. (1983). Structural basis of orientation sensitivity of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Comparative Neurology 220, 465–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levick, W.R. & Thibos, L.N. (1982). Analysis of orientation bias in the cat retina. Journal of Physiology 329, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mustari, M.J., Bullier, J. & Henry, G.H. (1982). Comparison of response properties of three types of monosynaptic S cell in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 47, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, B.R. & Berman, N. (1983). Functional organization of neurons in cat striate cortex: variations in preferred orientation and orientation selectivity with receptive-field type, ocular dominance, and location in visual-field map. Journal of Neurophysiology 49, 1051–1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rauschecker, J.P. (1984). Neuronal mechanisms of developmental plasticity in the cat's visual system. Human Neurobiology 3,109–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Rose, D. & Blakemore, C. (1974). An analysis of orientation selectivity in the cat's visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research 20, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schall, J.D., Vitek, J.D. & Leventhal, A.G. (1986). Retinal constraints on orientation specificity in cat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 6, 823–826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shou, T. & Leventhal, A.G. (1989). Organized arranement of orientation-sensitive relay cells in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience 9 4287–4302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shou, T., Ruan, D. & Zhou, Y. (1986). The orientation bias of LGN neurones shows topographic relation to area centralis in the cat retina. Experimental Brain Research 64, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soodak, R.E., Shapley, R.M. & Kaplan, E. (1987). Linear mechanism of orientation tuning in the retina and lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology 58, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vidyasagar, T.R. (1985). Geniculate orientation biases as Cartesian co-ordinates for cortical orientation detectors. In Models of the visual cones, ed. Rose, D. & Dobson, V.G., pp. 390–395. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Vidyasagar, T.R. (1987). A model of striate response properties based on geniculate anisotropies, Biological Cybernetics 57, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidyasagar, T.R. & Heide, W. (1984). Geniculate orientation biases seen with moving sine-wave gratings: implications for a model of simple cell afferent connectivity. Experimental Brain Research 57, 196–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidyasagar, T.R. & Urbas, J.V. (1982). Orientation sensitivity of cat LGN neurones with and without inputs from visual cortical areas 17 and 18. Experimental Brain Research 46, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar