Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-vtfg7 Total loading time: 0.306 Render date: 2022-05-23T23:57:07.537Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom
Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom
Applied Vision Research Centre, The Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Vision Sciences, City University, London, United Kingdom


Generally women are believed to be more discriminating than men in the use of color names and this is often taken to imply superior color vision. However, if both X-chromosome linked color deficient males (∼8%) and females (<1%) as well as heterozygote female carriers (∼15%) are excluded from comparisons, then differences between men and women in red-green (RG) color discrimination have been reported as not being significant (e.g., Pickford, 1944; Hood et al., 2006). We re-examined this question by assessing the performance of 150 males and 150 females on the color assessment and diagnosis (CAD) test (Rodriguez-Carmona et al., 2005). This is a sensitive test that yields small color detection thresholds. The test employs direction-specific, moving, chromatic stimuli embedded in a background of random, dynamic, luminance contrast noise. A four-alternative, forced-choice procedure is employed to measure the subject's thresholds for detection of color signals in 16 directions in color space, while ensuring that the subject cannot make use of any residual luminance contrast signals. In addition, we measured the Rayleigh anomaloscope matches in a subgroup of 111 males and 114 females. All the age-matched males (30.8 ± 9.7) and females (26.7 ± 8.8) had normal color vision as diagnosed by a battery of conventional color vision tests. Females with known color deficient relatives were excluded from the study. Comparisons between the male and female groups revealed no significant differences in anomaloscope midpoints (p = 0.709), but a significant difference in matching ranges (p = 0.040); females on average tended to have a larger mean range (4.11) than males (3.75). Females also had significantly higher CAD thresholds than males along the RG (p = 0.0004), but not along the yellow-blue (YB) discrimination axis. The differences between males and females in RG discrimination may be related to the heterozygosity in X-linked cone photo pigment expression common among females.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Anyan, W.R. Jr. & Quillian, W.W.I. (1971). The naming of primary colors by children. Child Development 42, 16291632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asenjo, A.B., Rim, J. & Oprian, D.D. (1994). Molecular determinants of human red/green color discrimination. Neuron 12, 11311138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbur, J.L. (2003). Understanding colour-normal and defective colour vision. Trends in Cognitive Science 7, 434436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbur, J.L. (2004). “Double-blindsight” revealed through the processing of color and luminance contrast defined motion signals. Progress in Brain Research 144, 243259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbur, J.L., Harlow, A.J. & Plant, G.T. (1994). Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 258, 327334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbur, J.L., Rodriguez-Carmona, M., Harlow, J.A., Mancuso, K., Neitz, J. & Neitz, M. (2008). A study of unusual Rayleigh matches in deutan deficiency. Visual Neuroscience 25, 507516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bimler, D.L. & Kirkland, J. (2002). Sex differences in color vision and the salience of color space axes. Journal of Vision 2, 28a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimler, D.L., Kirkland, J. & Jameson, K.A. (2004). Quantifying variations in personal color spaces: Are there sex differences in color vision? Color Research and Application 29, 128134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, J., Young, A. & David, S. (1991). Variations in normal trichromatism. In Colour Vision Deficiencies X, ed. Drum, B., Moreland, J.D. & Serra, A., pp. 267272. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J., McMahon, C., Neitz, M. & Neitz, J. (2000). Flicker-photometric electroretinogram estimates of L:M cone photoreceptor ratio in men with photopigment spectra derived from genetics. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision 17, 499509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M.F., Ventura, D.F., Perazzolo, F., Murakoshi, M. & Silveira, L.C. (2006). Absence of binocular summation, eye dominance, and learning effects in color discrimination. Visual Neuroscience 23, 461469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vries, H. (1948). The heredity of the relative numbers of red and green receptors in the human eye. Genetica 24, 199212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furbee, N.L., Maynard, K., Smith, J.J., Benfer, B.A. Jr., Quick, S. & Ross, L. (1997). The emergence of color cognition from color perception. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 6, 223240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, S.M., Mollon, J.D., Purves, L. & Jordan, G. (2006). Color discrimination in carriers of color deficiency. Vision Research 46, 28942900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurlbert, A.C. & Ling, Y. (2007). Biological components of sex differences in color preference. Currents in Biology 17, R623R625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, K.A., Highnote, S.M. & Wasserman, L.M. (2001). Richer color experience in observers with multiple photopigment opsin genes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 244261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, G. & Mollon, J.D. (1993). A study of women heterozygous for colour deficiencies. Vision Research 33, 14951508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuehni, R.G. (2001). Determination of unique hues using Munsell color chips. Color Research and Application 26, 6166.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M.W. (2000). Fundamentals of sensation and perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nathans, J., Merbs, S.L., Sung, C.H., Weitz, C.J. & Wang, Y. (1992). Molecular genetics of human visual pigments. Annual Review of Genetics 26, 403424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G.H. (1986). Polymorphism of the long-wavelength cone in normal human colour vision. Nature 323, 623625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, J., Neitz, M., He, J.C. & Shevell, S.K. (1999). Trichromatic color vision with only two spectrally distinct photopigments. Nature Neuroscience 2, 884888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, J., Neitz, M. & Jacobs, G.H. (1993). More than three different cone pigments among people with normal color vision. Vision Research 33, 117122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, J., Neitz, M. & Kainz, P.M. (1996). Visual pigment gene structure and the severity of color vision defects. Science 274, 801804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neitz, M., Neitz, J. & Jacobs, G.H. (1991). Spectral tuning of pigments underlying red-green color vision. Science 252, 971974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowaczyk, R.H. (1982). Sex-related differences in the color lexicon. Language and Speech 25, 257265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, P.J., Perez, A.L. & Suero, M.I. (2007). An example of sex-linked color vision differences. Color Research & Application 32, 433439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Carpinell, J., Baldovi, R., de Fez, M.D. & Castro, J. (1998). Color memory matching: Time effect and other factors. Color Research & Application 23, 234247.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickford, R.W. (1944). Women with colour-blind relatives. Nature 153, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickford, R.W. (1947). Sex differences in colour vision. Nature 159, 606607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, L.T. (1966). A note on the perpetuation of a “scientific” fiction. Sociometry 29, 8588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, E. (1977). Sex-related differences in colour vocabulary. Lang Speech 20, 404409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez-Carmona, M. (2006). Variability of Chromatic Sensitivity: Fundamental Studies and Clinical Applications. London, UK: City University.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Carmona, M., Harlow, A.J., Walker, G. & Barbur, J.L. (2005). The Variability of Normal Trichromatic Vision and the Establishment of the ‘Normal’ Range. Proceedings of 10th Congress of the International Colour Association, Granada (Granada, 2005) 979982.Google Scholar
Saito, M. (1994). Cross-cultural study on color preference in three Asian cities: Comparison between Tokyo, Taipei and Tianjin. Japanese Psychological Research 36, 219232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. (1996). A comparative study of color preferences in Japan, China and Indonesia with emphasis on the preference for white. Perception and Motor Skills 83, 115128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, M. (1999). Blue and seven phenomena among Japanese students. Perception and Motor Skills 89, 532536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanocki, E., Shevell, S.K. & Winderickx, J. (1994). Serine/alanine amino acid polymorphism of the L-cone photopigment assessed by dual Rayleigh-type color matches. Vision Research 34, 377382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, L.T., Stockman, A., Jagle, H., Knau, H., Klausen, G., Reitner, A. & Nathans, J. (1998). Red, green, and red-green hybrid pigments in the human retina: Correlations between deduced protein sequences and psychophysically measured spectral sensitivities. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 1005310069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharpe, L.T., Stockman, A., Jagle, H. & Nathans, J. (1999). Opsin genes, cone photopigments, color vision, and color blindness. In Color Vision: From Genes to Perception, ed. Gegenfurtner, K.R. & Sharpe, L.T., pp. 352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. & Tarrant, A.W. (1991). Sex- and age-related differences in colour vocabulary. Langue Speech 34, 5762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaringen, S., Layman, S. & Wilson, A. (1978). Sex-differences in color naming. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 440442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L.L., Curtis, A.T. & Bolton, R. (1978). Sex-differences in elirefd color lexicon size. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 7778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P.E. & Straker, A. (1943). Distribution of colour blind men in Great Britain. Nature 152, 690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorobyev, M. (2004). Ecology and evolution of primate colour vision. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 87, 230238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winderickx, J., Lindsey, D.T., Sanocki, E., Teller, D.Y., Motulsky, A.G. & Deeb, S.S. (1992). Polymorphism in red photopigment underlies variation in colour matching. Nature 356, 431433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Sex-related differences in chromatic sensitivity
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *