Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:48:25.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chromatic discrimination in the presence of incremental and decremental rod pedestals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

DINGCAI CAO ,
ANDREW J. ZELE  and
JOEL POKORNY
DINGCAI CAO
Affiliation:
Visual Science Laboratories, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
ANDREW J. ZELE
Affiliation:
School of Optometry and the Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
JOEL POKORNY*
Affiliation:
Visual Science Laboratories, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Joel Pokorny, Visual Science Laboratories, The University of Chicago, 940 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: j-pokorny@uchicago.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Signals from rods can alter chromatic discrimination. Here, chromatic discrimination ellipses were determined in the presence of rod incremental and decremental pedestals at mesopic light levels. The data were represented in a relative cone Troland space, normalized by discrimination thresholds measured along the cardinal axes without a rod pedestal. In the quadrant of cone space where L-cone relative to M-cone excitation increased, and S-cone excitation decreased, rod incremental pedestals degraded chromatic discrimination, and rod decremental pedestals improved chromatic discrimination. Discrimination in the other three quadrants of cone space was unaffected by the incremental or decremental rod pedestals. A second experiment measured chromatic discrimination under conditions where cone pedestals were matched to the appearances of the incremental and decremental rod pedestals. Based on the matching pedestal data, discrimination then could be measured independently along the cardinal axes using either chromatic [L/(L + M); S/(L + M)] or luminance (L + M) pedestal components. The discrimination data altered by the rod pedestals were similar to chromatic cone pedestals for L/M increment discrimination, but similar to luminance cone pedestals for S decrement discrimination. The results indicated that the rod and cone signals combined differently in determining chromatic discrimination for different post-receptoral pathways.

Keywords

Chromatic discriminationRod pedestalMesopicRod-cone interactionPost-receptoral pathways
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buck, S.L. (2004). Rod-cone interaction in human vision. In The Visual Neuroscience, vol. 1, ed. Chalupa, L.M. & Werner, J.S., pp. 863–878. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cao, D., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (2005). Matching rod percepts with cone stimuli. Vision Research 45, 2119–2128.Google Scholar
Cao, D., Zele, A.J. & Pokorny, J. (2006). Dark-adapted rod suppression of cone flicker detection: Evaluation of receptoral and postreceptoral interactions. Visual Neuroscience 23, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, D., Zele, A.J. & Pokorny, J. (2007). Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: Rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model. Vision Research 47, 1060–1074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, D., Zele, A.J., Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (2008). S-cone discrimination for stimuli with spatial and temporal chromatic contrast. Visual Neuroscience 25, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M. (1950). Colour perception in parafoveal vision. Proceedings of the Physical Society (London) B63, 83–89.Google Scholar
Knight, R., Buck, S.L., Fowler, G.A. & Nguyen, A. (1998). Rods affect S-cone discrimination on the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test. Vision Research 38, 3477–3481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, R., Buck, S.L. & Pereverzeva, M. (2001). Stimulus size affects influence on Tritan chromatic discrimination. Color Research and Application 26, S65–S68.Google Scholar
Lythgoe, R. (1931). Dark-adaptation and the peripheral colour sensations of normal subjects. British Journal of Ophthalmology 15, 193–210.Google Scholar
MacLeod, D.I.A. & Boynton, R.M. (1979). Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69, 1183–1185.Google Scholar
Nagy, A.L. & Doyal, J.A. (1993). Red-green color discrimination as a function of stimulus field size in peripheral vision. Journal of Optical Society of America, A 10, 1147–1156.Google Scholar
Nagy, A.L., Eskew, R.T. & Boynton, R.M. (1987). Analysis of color-matching ellipses in a cone-excitation space. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A 4, 756–768.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (2004). Chromatic Discrimination. In The Visual Neuroscience, vol. 2, ed. Chalupa, L.M. & Werner, J.S., pp. 908–923. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J., Smithson, H. & Quinlan, J. (2004). Photostimulator allowing independent control of rods and the three cone types. Visual Neuroscience 21, 263–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puts, M.J.H., Pokorny, J., Quinlan, J. & Glennie, L. (2005). Audiophile hardware in vision science; the soundcard as a digital to analog converter. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 142, 77–81.Google Scholar
Shapiro, A.G., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (1996). Cone-Rod receptor spaces, with illustrations that use CRT phosphor and light-emitting-diode spectra. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 13, 2319–2328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (1996). The design and use of a cone chromaticity space. Color Research and Application 21, 375–383.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J. & Sun, H. (2000). Chromatic contrast discrimination: Data and prediction for stimuli varying in L and M cone excitation. Color Research and Application 25, 105–115.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stabell, B. & Stabell, U. (1977a). The chromaticity coordinates from spectrum colours of extrafoveal cones. Vision Research 17, 1091–1094.Google Scholar
Stabell, U. & Stabell, B. (1977b). Wavelength discrimination of peripheral cones and its change with rod intrusion. Vision Research 17, 423–426.Google Scholar
Sun, H., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V.C. (2001). Brightness Induction from rods. Journal of Vision 1, 32–41.Google Scholar
Swanson, W.H., Ueno, T., Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (1987). Temporal modulation sensitivity and pulse detection thresholds for chromatic and luminance perturbations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 1992–2005.Google Scholar
Yebra, A., Garcia, J.A. & Romero, J. (1994). Color discrimination data for 2-degrees and 8-degrees and normalized ellipses. Journal of Optics-Nouvelle Revue D Optique 25, 231–242.Google Scholar
Zele, A.J., Smith, V.C. & Pokorny, J. (2006). Spatial and temporal chromatic contrast: Effect on chromatic contrast discrimination for stimuli varying in L- and M-cone excitation. Visual Neuroscience 23, 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar